• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单次鞘内注射吗啡与连续硬膜外镇痛对胃癌术后住院时间的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

Effect of single-shot intrathecal morphine versus continuous epidural analgesia on length of stay after gastrectomy for cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésiologie, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

CHU de Québec, Université Laval, 10 Rue de L'Espinay, Québec, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jul;26(4):648-652. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01386-1. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-023-01386-1
PMID:37017792
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-dose intrathecal opiates (ITO) could shorten the length of hospital stay compared to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). This study aimed to compare TEA with TIO in terms of length of hospital stay, pain control, and parenteral opioid consumption in patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer.

METHODS

The patients who underwent gastrectomy for cancer in 2007-2018 at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval were included. The patients were grouped as TEA and intrathecal morphine (ITM). The primary outcome was the length of hospital of stay (LOS). The secondary outcomes were numeric rating scales (NRS) for pain and parenteral opioid consumption.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included. There were no differences in preoperative characteristics between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The median LOS was shorter in the ITM group than in the TEA group (median, 7.5 vs. 10 days, P = 0.049). The opioids consumption at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the TEA group at all time points. The NRS score for pain was lower in the TEA group than in the ITM group at all time points (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ITM analgesia undergoing gastrectomy presented shorter LOS than those with TEA. ITM had an inferior pain control that did not have a clinical impact on recovery in the cohort studied. Given the limitations of this retrospective study, further trials are warranted.

摘要

背景

与胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)相比,单次鞘内阿片类药物(ITO)可缩短住院时间。本研究旨在比较 TEA 和 TIO 在癌症患者行胃癌手术后的住院时间、疼痛控制和肠外阿片类药物消耗方面的差异。

方法

纳入 2007 年至 2018 年在魁北克大学拉瓦尔大学医疗中心接受胃癌切除术的患者。将患者分为 TEA 和鞘内吗啡(ITM)组。主要结局是住院时间(LOS)。次要结局为疼痛的数字评分量表(NRS)和肠外阿片类药物消耗。

结果

共纳入 79 例患者。两组患者术前特征无差异(均 P>0.05)。ITM 组 LOS 中位数明显短于 TEA 组(中位数,7.5 天比 10 天,P=0.049)。在术后 12、24 和 48 小时,TEA 组的阿片类药物消耗在所有时间点均显著低于 ITM 组。在所有时间点,TEA 组的 NRS 评分均低于 ITM 组(均 P<0.05)。

结论

接受 ITM 镇痛的胃癌切除术患者的 LOS 短于 TEA 组。ITM 镇痛的疼痛控制效果较差,但在研究队列中对恢复没有临床影响。鉴于本回顾性研究的局限性,还需要进一步的试验。

相似文献

1
Effect of single-shot intrathecal morphine versus continuous epidural analgesia on length of stay after gastrectomy for cancer: a retrospective cohort study.单次鞘内注射吗啡与连续硬膜外镇痛对胃癌术后住院时间的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jul;26(4):648-652. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01386-1. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
Efficacy of intrathecal morphine combined with intravenous analgesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia after gastrectomy.胃切除术后鞘内注射吗啡联合静脉镇痛与胸段硬膜外镇痛的疗效比较
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Jul;55(4):1106-14. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.4.1106.
3
A prospective cohort study of intrathecal versus epidural analgesia for patients undergoing hepatic resection.一项针对肝切除患者鞘内镇痛与硬膜外镇痛的前瞻性队列研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Aug;16(8):768-75. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12222. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
4
Effect of intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia on postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery for gynecologic malignancy: an open-label randomised trial.鞘内吗啡和硬膜外镇痛对妇科恶性肿瘤腹部手术后恢复的影响:一项开放标签随机试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 4;9(3):e024484. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024484.
5
Pain management in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion: combined intrathecal morphine and continuous epidural versus PCA.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者后路脊柱融合术后的疼痛管理:鞘内注射吗啡联合持续硬膜外镇痛与患者自控镇痛的比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Dec;32(8):799-804. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182694f00.
6
Intrathecal morphine in combination with bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective cohort study.鞘内注射吗啡联合布比卡因用于后路腰椎融合术的超前镇痛:回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 18;17(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03124-2.
7
Intrathecal Morphine and Oral Analgesics Provide Safe and Effective Pain Control After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.鞘内注射吗啡和口服镇痛药可安全有效地控制青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路脊柱融合术后的疼痛。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 15;43(2):E98-E104. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002245.
8
A change in practice from epidural to intrathecal morphine analgesia for hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery.肝胰胆手术中镇痛方式从硬膜外吗啡镇痛改为鞘内吗啡镇痛的变化。
World J Surg. 2009 Sep;33(9):1802-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0131-2.
9
A retrospective comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural hydromorphone for analgesia following posterior spinal fusion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.鞘内注射吗啡与硬膜外注射氢吗啡酮用于青少年特发性脊柱侧弯后路脊柱融合术后镇痛的回顾性比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jan;27(1):91-97. doi: 10.1111/pan.13037. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
10
Intrathecal Morphine and Effect on Opioid Consumption and Functional Recovery after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.鞘内吗啡和胰腺十二指肠切除术后阿片类药物消耗和功能恢复的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Sep 1;235(3):392-400. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000261. Epub 2022 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Insights and progress on postoperative analgesia of radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comprehensive review.胃癌根治性胃切除术后镇痛的见解与进展:一项综述
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 30;6:1601220. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1601220. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of nalbuphine on analgesia and pain factors after gastric cancer resection.纳布啡对胃癌切除术后镇痛及疼痛相关因素的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):99327. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.99327.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioids in Cancer Development, Progression and Metastasis: Focus on Colorectal Cancer.阿片类药物在癌症发展、进展和转移中的作用:以结直肠癌为例。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020 Jan 22;21(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0699-1.
2
Opioids and breast cancer recurrence.阿片类药物与乳腺癌复发
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2019 Jun;13(2):88-93. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000426.
3
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: Does It Enhance Recovery?胸段硬膜外镇痛:它能促进恢复吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Dec;61(12):1403-1409. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001226.
4
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidural Analgesia Versus Different Analgesic Regimes Following Oesophagogastric Resection.经食管胃切除术后硬膜外镇痛与不同镇痛方案的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2018 Jan;42(1):204-210. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4141-1.
5
Comparison of the effects of patient-controlled epidural and intravenous analgesia on postoperative bowel function after laparoscopic gastrectomy: a prospective randomized study.经腹腔镜胃切除术患者自控硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛对术后肠功能影响的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4688-4696. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5537-6. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
6
Randomized clinical trial of perioperative nerve block and continuous local anaesthetic infiltration via wound catheter versus epidural analgesia in open liver resection (LIVER 2 trial).随机对照临床试验:围手术期神经阻滞和经伤口导管持续局部麻醉浸润与硬膜外镇痛在开腹肝切除术中的比较(LIVER 2 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2015 Dec;102(13):1619-28. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9949. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
7
Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.加速康复外科中开腹手术后的镇痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Dec;149(12):1224-30. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.210.
8
Efficacy of intrathecal morphine combined with intravenous analgesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia after gastrectomy.胃切除术后鞘内注射吗啡联合静脉镇痛与胸段硬膜外镇痛的疗效比较
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Jul;55(4):1106-14. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.4.1106.
9
Reduction in length of stay for patients undergoing oesophageal and gastric resections with implementation of enhanced recovery packages.通过实施强化康复方案,缩短接受食管和胃切除术患者的住院时间。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Jul;95(5):323-8. doi: 10.1308/003588413X13629960046039.
10
Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.择期结肠手术围手术期护理指南:术后加速康复(ERAS(®))学会推荐意见
World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):259-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0.