Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Data Science Center, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jun;102(6):708-715. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14569. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Placental abruption is a serious complication, especially when accompanied by intrauterine fetal death. The optimal delivery route for placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death for reducing maternal complications is still unclear. In this study we aimed to compare the maternal outcomes between cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery in women with placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death.
Using the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology nationwide perinatal registry database, we identified pregnant women with placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death between 2013 and 2019. The following women were excluded: those with multiple pregnancies, placenta previa, placenta accreta spectrum, amniotic fluid embolism, or whose delivery route was missing data. The association between delivery routes (cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery) and the maternal outcome was examined using a linear regression model with inverse probability weighting. The primary outcome was the amount of bleeding during delivery. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation.
The number of women with placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death was 1218/1601932 (0.076%). Of 1134 women analyzed, 608 (53.6%) underwent cesarean delivery. Bleeding during delivery (median [interquartile range]) was 1650.00 (950.00-2450.00) (mL) and 1171.00 (500.00-2196.50) (mL) in cesarean and vaginal delivery, respectively. Bleeding during delivery (mL) was significantly greater in cesarean delivery than in vaginal delivery (regression coefficient, 1086.39; 95% confidence interval, 130.96-2041.81; p = 0.026). Maternal death and uterine rupture occurred in four (0.4%) and five (0.4%) women, respectively. The four maternal deaths were noted in the vaginal delivery group.
Bleeding during delivery was significantly greater in cesarean delivery than that in vaginal delivery in women with placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death. However, severe complications, including maternal death and uterine rupture, occurred in vaginal delivery-related cases. The management of women with placental abruption with intrauterine fetal death should be cautious regardless of the delivery route.
胎盘早剥是一种严重的并发症,尤其是当伴有宫内胎儿死亡时。对于减少产妇并发症的胎盘早剥合并宫内胎儿死亡产妇,最佳的分娩方式仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较胎盘早剥合并宫内胎儿死亡产妇行剖宫产与阴道分娩的母婴结局。
我们使用日本妇产科协会全国围产儿登记数据库,于 2013 年至 2019 年间确定了胎盘早剥合并宫内胎儿死亡的孕妇。排除多胎妊娠、前置胎盘、胎盘植入谱、羊水栓塞以及分娩方式缺失数据的孕妇。采用逆概率加权线性回归模型比较分娩方式(剖宫产和阴道分娩)与母婴结局的关系。主要结局为分娩时出血量。使用多重插补法处理缺失数据。
1218/1601932(0.076%)例胎盘早剥合并宫内胎儿死亡孕妇,其中 1134 例进行了分析,608 例(53.6%)行剖宫产。剖宫产分娩时出血量(中位数[四分位距])为 1650.00(950.00-2450.00)mL,阴道分娩时为 1171.00(500.00-2196.50)mL。剖宫产分娩时出血量显著大于阴道分娩(回归系数,1086.39;95%置信区间,130.96-2041.81;p=0.026)。4 例(0.4%)产妇死亡,5 例(0.4%)子宫破裂。4 例产妇死亡均发生在阴道分娩组。
胎盘早剥合并宫内胎儿死亡产妇行剖宫产时出血量显著大于阴道分娩。然而,阴道分娩相关病例发生严重并发症,包括产妇死亡和子宫破裂。对于胎盘早剥合并宫内胎儿死亡产妇,无论分娩方式如何,都应谨慎处理。