Stringfellow Erin J, Lim Tse Yang, DiGennaro Catherine, Hasgul Zeynep, Jalali Mohammad S
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Mar 3;2(4):pgad064. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad064. eCollection 2023 Apr.
In 2020, the ongoing US opioid overdose crisis collided with the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. Opioid overdose deaths (OODs) rose an unprecedented 38%, due to a combination of COVID-19 disrupting services essential to people who use drugs, continued increases in fentanyls in the illicit drug supply, and other factors. How much did these factors contribute to increased OODs? We used a validated simulation model of the opioid overdose crisis, SOURCE, to estimate excess OODs in 2020 and the distribution of that excess attributable to various factors. Factors affecting OODs that could have been disrupted by COVID-19, and for which data were available, included opioid prescribing, naloxone distribution, and receipt of medications for opioid use disorder. We also accounted for fentanyls' presence in the heroin supply. We estimated a total of 18,276 potential excess OODs, including 1,792 lives saved due to increases in buprenorphine receipt and naloxone distribution and decreases in opioid prescribing. Critically, growth in fentanyls drove 43% (7,879) of the excess OODs. A further 8% is attributable to first-ever declines in methadone maintenance treatment and extended-released injectable naltrexone treatment, most likely due to COVID-19-related disruptions. In all, 49% of potential excess OODs remain unexplained, at least some of which are likely due to additional COVID-19-related disruptions. While the confluence of various COVID-19-related factors could have been responsible for more than half of excess OODs, fentanyls continued to play a singular role in excess OODs, highlighting the urgency of mitigating their effects on overdoses.
2020年,美国持续的阿片类药物过量危机与新出现的新冠疫情相撞。阿片类药物过量死亡人数(OODs)空前上涨了38%,这是由新冠疫情扰乱对吸毒者至关重要的服务、非法药物供应中芬太尼持续增加以及其他因素共同导致的。这些因素对OODs增加的贡献有多大?我们使用了经过验证的阿片类药物过量危机模拟模型SOURCE,来估计2020年的过量OODs以及该过量部分归因于各种因素的分布情况。可能因新冠疫情而受到干扰且有数据可用的影响OODs的因素包括阿片类药物处方、纳洛酮分发以及阿片类药物使用障碍药物的接受情况。我们还考虑了海洛因供应中芬太尼的存在。我们估计总共存在18276例潜在的过量OODs,其中包括由于丁丙诺啡接受量和纳洛酮分发增加以及阿片类药物处方减少而挽救的1792条生命。至关重要的是,芬太尼的增长导致了43%(7879例)的过量OODs。另有8%可归因于美沙酮维持治疗和长效注射用纳曲酮治疗首次出现下降,最有可能是由于与新冠疫情相关的干扰。总体而言,49%的潜在过量OODs仍无法解释,其中至少一些可能是由于与新冠疫情相关的其他干扰。虽然各种与新冠疫情相关的因素共同作用可能导致了超过一半的过量OODs,但芬太尼在过量OODs中继续发挥着独特作用,凸显了减轻其对过量用药影响的紧迫性。