Suppr超能文献

使用LAP-VEGaS指南评估YouTube上关于胸腔镜交感神经切除术的视频。

Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines.

作者信息

Adorisio Ottavio, Davoli Enrico, De Peppo Francesco

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Surgery Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Department of General Surgery, Campus Biomedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Mar 20;10:1133124. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133124. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The study aims to evaluate the quality of videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy on YouTube® using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria.

METHODS

YouTube was searched using the following keyword: "thoracoscopic sympathectomy" on August 22, 2021. The first 50 videos were analyzed and classified for baseline characteristics and conformity to the LAP-VEGaS checklist.

RESULTS

Duration ranged from 19 s to 22 min. The mean number of likes was 14.8 (range 0-80). The mean number of dislikes was 2.5 (range 0-14). The mean number of comments was 8.5 (range 0-67). Nineteen videos did not meet our criteria and were excluded. Regarding the remaining 31 videos, none contained all 16 points of the LAP-VEGaS essential checklist (mean 5.4 points, range 2-14 points), with almost all neglecting preoperative information and outcomes. The mean percentage of conformity was 37% (range 12%-93%). The most viewed videos were not associated with higher conformity to LAP-VEGaS criteria showing only 4/16 points (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of videos addressing TS on YouTube®, based on the LAP-VEGaS checklist may be considered not acceptable. Experienced surgeons and surgeons in trainees should be aware of this when using it as a learning resource in their clinical practice.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在使用腹腔镜手术视频教育指南(LAP-VEGaS)标准评估YouTube®上关于胸腔镜交感神经切除术视频的质量。

方法

于2021年8月22日在YouTube上使用以下关键词进行搜索:“胸腔镜交感神经切除术”。对前50个视频进行分析,并根据基线特征和与LAP-VEGaS检查表的符合情况进行分类。

结果

视频时长从19秒到22分钟不等。点赞数的平均值为14.8(范围为0 - 80)。点踩数的平均值为2.5(范围为0 - 14)。评论数的平均值为8.5(范围为0 - 67)。19个视频不符合我们的标准,被排除。对于其余31个视频,没有一个包含LAP-VEGaS基本检查表的所有16项内容(平均5.4项,范围为2 - 14项),几乎所有视频都忽略了术前信息和结果。符合率的平均值为37%(范围为12% - 93%)。观看次数最多的视频与LAP-VEGaS标准的符合度并不更高,仅显示4/16项(25%)。

结论

根据LAP-VEGaS检查表,YouTube®上关于胸腔镜交感神经切除术的视频质量可能被认为是不可接受的。经验丰富的外科医生和实习外科医生在临床实践中将其用作学习资源时应意识到这一点。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines.
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 20;10:1133124. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133124. eCollection 2023.
3
Educational Value of YouTube Surgical Videos of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A Qualitative Assessment.
J Endourol. 2020 Nov;34(11):1129-1133. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0102. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Can YouTube Be Considered a Reliable Learning Tool for Urology Trainees Seeking Information on Testicular Exploration?
Cureus. 2023 Oct 19;15(10):e47340. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47340. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Quality of YouTube Videos on Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Children: An Independent Assessment by Two Pediatric Surgeons.
Cureus. 2021 Aug 11;13(8):e17085. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17085. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
Cureus. 2023 Feb 7;15(2):e34718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34718. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Evaluation of YouTube Videos in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Lobectomy Education.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Nov;30(11):1223-1230. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0140. Epub 2020 May 13.
9
Evaluation of Online Videos of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using the LAP-VEGaS Guidelines.
Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):111-116. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04876-8. Epub 2020 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review.
Surg Today. 2024 Oct;54(10):1113-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1. Epub 2024 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Rib-oriented Thoracoscopic Sympathetic Surgery for Hyperhidrosis: Prospective Long-term Results and Quality of Life.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Feb 16;31(3):307-312. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000925.
2
Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos addressing robotic pyeloplasty in children.
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Jun;17(3):390.e1-390.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
Evaluation of Online Videos of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using the LAP-VEGaS Guidelines.
Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):111-116. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04876-8. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
Use of YouTube as a Resource for Surgical Education-Clarity or Confusion.
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):445-449. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
6
Reliability and Educational Value of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery Videos on YouTube.
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):2806-2813. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03907-3.
7
The Reliability of Bariatric Surgery Videos in YouTube Platform.
Obes Surg. 2018 Mar;28(3):712-716. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2911-3.
8
YouTube is the Most Frequently Used Educational Video Source for Surgical Preparation.
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):1072-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
9
YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization.
Scand J Urol. 2015 Apr;49(2):189-92. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.975837. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
10
YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 14;20(14):4066-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.4066.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验