• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后路脊神经根入区切断术治疗臂丛神经损伤后持续性与阵发性疼痛的有效性和安全性如何?

Is dorsal root entry zone lesioning effective and safe for managing continuous versus paroxysmal pains post-brachial plexus avulsion?

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

2Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Mar 31;39(1):101-112. doi: 10.3171/2023.2.SPINE221252. Print 2023 Jul 1.

DOI:10.3171/2023.2.SPINE221252
PMID:37021771
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) experience chronic deafferentation pain characterized by two patterns: continuous background pain and electrical shooting paroxysmal attacks. The authors' aim was to report the effectiveness and safety of dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning in relieving the two forms of pain over short and long periods.

METHODS

All patients who underwent DREZ lesioning performed by the senior author for medically refractory BPA-related pain between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, in Johns Hopkins Hospital were followed up. The intensity levels for continuous and paroxysmal pains were evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS) preoperatively and at 4 time points postsurgery, including the day of discharge, with a mean hospital stay of 5.6 ± 1.8 days; first postoperative clinic visit (33.0 ± 15.7 days); short-term follow-up (4.0 ± 1.4 months); and long-term follow-up (3.1 ± 1.3 years). The percent of pain relief according to the NRS was categorized into excellent (≥ 75%), fair (25%-74%), and poor (< 25%).

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were included, with 4 (21.1%) lost to long-term follow-up. The mean age was 52.7 ± 13.6 years; 16 (84.2%) were men, and 10 (52.6%) had left-sided injuries. A motor vehicle accident was the most common etiology of BPA (n = 16, 84.2%). Preoperatively, all patients had motor deficits, and 8 (42.1%) experienced somatosensory deficits. The greatest pain relief was observed at the first postoperative and short-term follow-up visits, with the lowest proportions of patients having continuous pain (26.3% and 23.5%, respectively) and paroxysmal pain (5.3% and 5.9%, respectively). Also, the highest reductions in mean NRS scores were observed for first postoperative and short-term follow-up visits (continuous 1.1 ± 2.1 and 1.1 ± 2.3; paroxysms 0.4 ± 1.4 and 0.5 ± 1.7, respectively) compared to the preoperative symptomatology (continuous 6.7 ± 3.0; paroxysms 7.9 ± 4.3) (p < 0.001). Most patients had excellent relief of continuous pain (82.4% and 81.3%) and of paroxysms (90.9% and 90.0%) at the first postoperative visit and short-term follow-up visit, respectively. The pain relief benefits had diminished by 3 years after surgery but remained significantly better than in the preoperative assessment. At the last evaluation, the proportion of patients achieving excellent relief of paroxysmal pain (66.7%) was double that for continuous pain (35.7%) (p < 0.001). New sensory phenomena were observed among 10 patients (52.6%), and 1 patient developed a motor deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

DREZ lesioning is an effective and safe option for relieving BPA-associated pain, with good long-term outcomes and better benefits for paroxysmal pain than for the continuous pain component.

摘要

目的

臂丛神经撕脱伤(BPA)患者经历以两种模式为特征的慢性去传入性疼痛:持续的背景疼痛和电激阵发性发作。作者的目的是报告在短期和长期内,通过背根入髓区(DREZ)消融术缓解这两种疼痛形式的有效性和安全性。

方法

在约翰霍普金斯医院,由资深作者对 2016 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 6 月 30 日期间因医学难治性 BPA 相关疼痛而行 DREZ 消融术的所有患者进行了随访。使用数字评分量表(NRS)在术前和术后 4 个时间点(包括出院当天)评估连续和阵发性疼痛的强度水平,平均住院时间为 5.6 ± 1.8 天;术后首次就诊(33.0 ± 15.7 天);短期随访(4.0 ± 1.4 个月);长期随访(3.1 ± 1.3 年)。根据 NRS 评估的疼痛缓解百分比分为优秀(≥75%)、良好(25%-74%)和差(<25%)。

结果

共纳入 19 例患者,其中 4 例(21.1%)长期随访丢失。平均年龄为 52.7 ± 13.6 岁;16 例(84.2%)为男性,10 例(52.6%)为左侧损伤。机动车事故是 BPA 最常见的病因(n=16,84.2%)。术前所有患者均有运动障碍,8 例(42.1%)有感觉障碍。在术后第一次和短期随访时观察到最大的疼痛缓解,连续疼痛(分别为 26.3%和 23.5%)和阵发性疼痛(分别为 5.3%和 5.9%)的患者比例最低。同样,术后第一次和短期随访时 NRS 评分的平均降低幅度最大(连续为 1.1 ± 2.1 和 1.1 ± 2.3;阵发性为 0.4 ± 1.4 和 0.5 ± 1.7),与术前症状相比(连续为 6.7 ± 3.0;阵发性为 7.9 ± 4.3)(p<0.001)。大多数患者在术后第一次就诊和短期随访时,连续疼痛(82.4%和 81.3%)和阵发性疼痛(90.9%和 90.0%)均有极好的缓解。术后 3 年疼痛缓解效果有所下降,但仍明显优于术前评估。在最后一次评估时,阵发性疼痛(66.7%)获得极好缓解的患者比例是连续疼痛(35.7%)的两倍(p<0.001)。10 例患者(52.6%)出现新的感觉现象,1 例患者出现运动障碍。

结论

DREZ 消融术是缓解 BPA 相关疼痛的有效且安全的选择,具有良好的长期效果,对阵发性疼痛的缓解效果优于持续性疼痛。

相似文献

1
Is dorsal root entry zone lesioning effective and safe for managing continuous versus paroxysmal pains post-brachial plexus avulsion?后路脊神经根入区切断术治疗臂丛神经损伤后持续性与阵发性疼痛的有效性和安全性如何?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Mar 31;39(1):101-112. doi: 10.3171/2023.2.SPINE221252. Print 2023 Jul 1.
2
Correlation of preoperative MRI with the long-term outcomes of dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion pain.术前磁共振成像与臂丛神经撕脱伤疼痛的背根入髓区毁损术长期疗效的相关性
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1470-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142572. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
3
Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for brachial plexus avulsion - technical evolution and long-term follow-up.臂丛神经撕脱伤的背根入髓区毁损术——技术进展与长期随访
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 May 30;166(1):241. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06132-9.
4
Microscissor DREZotomy for post brachial plexus avulsion neuralgia: A single center experience.显微镜下微剪刀 DREZ 切开术治疗臂丛神经节后断裂性神经痛:单中心经验。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Sep;208:106840. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106840. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
Dorsal root entry zone lesioning for pain after brachial plexus avulsion: results with special emphasis on differential effects on the paroxysmal versus the continuous components. A prospective study in a 29-patient consecutive series.臂丛神经根撕脱伤后疼痛的背根入区切断术:特别强调对阵发性与持续性成分的不同影响的结果。29 例连续病例的前瞻性研究。
Pain. 2011 Aug;152(8):1923-1930. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.037. Epub 2011 May 5.
6
Differential efficacy of electric motor cortex stimulation and lesioning of the dorsal root entry zone for continuous vs paroxysmal pain after brachial plexus avulsion.臂丛神经撕脱伤后持续与阵发性疼痛的电机皮质刺激与背根入区切断术的疗效差异。
Neurosurgery. 2011 May;68(5):1252-7; discussion 1257-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820c04a9.
7
The Safety and Efficacy of Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Pain Management in Patients With Brachial Plexus Avulsion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮脊柱神经根入区切断术治疗臂丛神经撕脱伤患者疼痛的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2024 Aug 1;95(2):259-274. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002906. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
8
Phantom Remodeling Effect of Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning in Phantom Limb Pain Caused by Brachial Plexus Avulsion.臂丛神经撕脱伤所致幻肢痛中背根入髓区损伤的幻肢重塑效应
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015;93(4):240-4. doi: 10.1159/000381556. Epub 2015 May 14.
9
Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for the Treatment of Pain After Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury: 2-Dimensional Operative Video and Technical Report.经皮脊神经根入区切断术治疗臂丛神经撕脱伤后疼痛:二维手术视频及技术报告。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022 Jun 1;22(6):e252-e258. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000149. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injuries: Case Series and Literature Review.臂丛神经撕脱伤的背根入髓区损伤:病例系列与文献综述
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 17;2:749801. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.749801. eCollection 2021.