Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Munich, Germany.
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Apr 6;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01151-2.
The COVID-19 pandemic impacts on working routines and workload of palliative care (PC) teams but information is lacking how resource use and associated hospital costs for PC changed at patient-level during the pandemic. We aim to describe differences in patient characteristics, care processes and resource use in specialist PC (PC unit and PC advisory team) in a university hospital before and during the first pandemic year.
Retrospective, cross-sectional study using routine data of all patients cared for in a PC unit and a PC advisory team during 10-12/2019 and 10-12/2020. Data included patient characteristics (age, sex, cancer/non-cancer, symptom/problem burden using Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS)), information on care episode, and labour time calculated in care minutes. Cost calculation with combined top-down bottom-up approach with hospital's cost data from 2019. Descriptive statistics and comparisons between groups using parametric and non-parametric tests.
Inclusion of 55/76 patient episodes in 2019/2020 from the PC unit and 135/120 episodes from the PC advisory team, respectively. IPOS scores were lower in 2020 (PCU: 2.0 points; PC advisory team: 3.0 points). The number of completed assessments differed considerably between years (PCU: episode beginning 30.9%/54.0% in 2019/2020; PC advisory team: 47.4%/40.0%). Care episodes were by one day shorter in 2020 in the PC advisory team. Only slight non-significant differences were observed regarding total minutes/day and patient (PCU: 150.0/141.1 min., PC advisory team: 54.2/66.9 min.). Staff minutes showed a significant decrease in minutes spent in direct contact with relatives (PCU: 13.9/7.3 min/day in 2019/2020, PC advisory team: 5.0/3.5 min/day). Costs per patient/day decreased significantly in 2020 compared to 2019 on the PCU (1075 Euro/944 Euro for 2019/2020) and increased significantly for the PC advisory team (161 Euro/200 Euro for 2019/2020). Overhead costs accounted for more than two thirds of total costs. Direct patient cost differed only slightly (PCU: 134.7 Euro/131.1 Euro in 2019/2020, PC advisory team: 54.4 Euro/57.3 Euro).
The pandemic partially impacted on daily work routines, especially on time spent with relatives and palliative care problem assessments. Care processes and quality of care might vary and have different outcomes during a crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Direct costs per patient/day were comparable, regardless of the pandemic.
COVID-19 大流行对姑息治疗(PC)团队的日常工作和工作量产生了影响,但缺乏信息表明在大流行期间 PC 患者的资源使用和相关医院费用在患者层面上发生了怎样的变化。我们旨在描述在大学医院的专科 PC(PC 病房和 PC 咨询团队)中,在大流行之前和第一年期间,患者特征、护理过程和资源使用方面的差异。
使用 PC 病房和 PC 咨询团队在 2019 年 10 月至 12 月和 2020 年 10 月至 12 月期间护理的所有患者的常规数据进行回顾性、横断面研究。数据包括患者特征(年龄、性别、癌症/非癌症、使用综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的症状/问题负担)、护理事件信息以及以护理分钟计算的劳动力时间。使用医院 2019 年的成本数据进行自上而下和自下而上相结合的成本计算。使用参数和非参数检验对组间进行描述性统计和比较。
分别纳入了 2019 年/2020 年 PC 病房的 55/76 例患者和 PC 咨询团队的 135/120 例患者。2020 年 IPOS 评分较低(PCU:2.0 分;PC 咨询团队:3.0 分)。完成评估的数量在不同年份之间差异很大(PCU:开始的评估数量为 30.9%/54.0%在 2019 年/2020 年;PC 咨询团队:47.4%/40.0%)。在 2020 年,PC 咨询团队的护理事件减少了一天。仅观察到总分钟/天和患者(PCU:150.0/141.1 分钟,PC 咨询团队:54.2/66.9 分钟)方面的轻微非显著差异。工作人员分钟数显示与亲属直接接触的时间显著减少(PCU:13.9/7.3 分钟/天在 2019 年/2020 年,PC 咨询团队:5.0/3.5 分钟/天)。与 2019 年相比,2020 年 PCU 上每位患者/天的成本显著降低(1075 欧元/944 欧元在 2019 年/2020 年,PC 咨询团队:161 欧元/200 欧元在 2019 年/2020 年)。并且 PC 咨询团队的成本显著增加(161 欧元/200 欧元在 2019 年/2020 年)。间接成本占总费用的三分之二以上。直接患者成本仅略有差异(PCU:134.7 欧元/131.1 欧元在 2019 年/2020 年,PC 咨询团队:54.4 欧元/57.3 欧元)。
大流行在一定程度上影响了日常工作流程,尤其是与亲属的时间和姑息治疗问题评估。在 COVID-19 大流行等危机期间,护理过程和护理质量可能会有所不同,结果也可能有所不同。无论是否发生大流行,每位患者/天的直接成本都具有可比性。