Hammant Alexander, Chithiramohan Tamara, Haunton Victoria, Beishon Lucy
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Cogent Psychol. 2023 Apr 1;10(1):2196005. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2023.2196005. eCollection 2023.
Cognitive deficits are prevalent after transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and result in loss of function, poorer quality of life and increased risks of dependency and mortality. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on cognitive assessment in TIA patients to determine the prevalence of cognitive deficits, and the optimal tests for cognitive assessment. Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and CINAHL databases were searched for relevant articles. Articles were screened by title and abstract. Full-text analysis and quality assessment was performed using the National Institute of Health Tool. Data were extracted on study characteristics, prevalence of TIA deficits, and key study findings. Due to significant heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible. Twenty-five full-text articles met the review inclusion criteria. There was significant heterogeneity in terms of cognitive tests used, definitions of cognitive impairment and TIA, time points post-event, and analysis methods. The majority of studies used the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ( = 23). Prevalence of cognitive impairment ranged from 2% to 100%, depending on the time-point and cognitive domain studied. The MoCA was more sensitive than the MMSE for identifying cognitive deficits. Deficits were common in executive function, attention, and language. No studies assessed diagnostic test accuracy against a reference standard diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Recommendations on cognitive testing after TIA are hampered by significant heterogeneity between studies, as well as a lack of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Future research should focus on harmonising tools, definitions, and time-points, and validating tools specifically for the TIA population.
短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后认知功能障碍很常见,会导致功能丧失、生活质量下降以及依赖和死亡风险增加。本系统评价旨在综合TIA患者认知评估的现有证据,以确定认知功能障碍的患病率以及认知评估的最佳测试方法。检索了Medline、Embase、PsychINFO和CINAHL数据库中的相关文章。通过标题和摘要筛选文章。使用美国国立卫生研究院工具进行全文分析和质量评估。提取了关于研究特征、TIA缺陷患病率和主要研究结果的数据。由于存在显著异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。25篇全文文章符合综述纳入标准。在使用的认知测试、认知障碍和TIA的定义、事件后的时间点以及分析方法方面存在显著异质性。大多数研究使用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)或蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)(n = 23)。认知障碍的患病率在2%至100%之间,具体取决于研究的时间点和认知领域。MoCA在识别认知缺陷方面比MMSE更敏感。执行功能、注意力和语言方面的缺陷很常见。没有研究根据认知障碍的参考标准诊断评估诊断测试的准确性。研究之间的显著异质性以及缺乏诊断测试准确性研究阻碍了对TIA后认知测试的建议。未来的研究应侧重于统一工具、定义和时间点,并专门针对TIA人群验证工具。