Suppr超能文献

复发性同节段椎间盘突出症的再次椎间盘切除术:过去5年的文献综述

Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years.

作者信息

Musa Gerald, Barrientos Rossi E C, Makirov Serik K, Chmutin Gennady E, Antonov Gennady I, Kim Alexander V, Otarov Olzhas

机构信息

Department of Neurological Diseases and Neurosurgery, Peoples Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia.

Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Spinal Surgery, Scientific and Technical Center, Family Clinic, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Mar 24;14:100. doi: 10.25259/SNI_168_2023. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recurrent disc herniations remain a challenge in spinal surgery. Although some authors recommend a repeat discectomy, others offer more invasive secondary fusions. Here, we reviewed the literature (2017-2022) regarding the safety/efficacy of treating recurrent disc herniations with repeated discectomy alone.

METHODS

Our literature search of recurrent lumbar disc herniations included; Medline, PubMed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane database. We focused on the types of discectomy performed, perioperative morbidity, costs, length of surgery, pain scores, and incidence of secondary dural tears.

RESULTS

We identified 769 cases that included 126 microdiscectomies, and 643 endoscopic discectomies. Rates of disc recurrence ranged from 1% to 25% with accompanying secondary durotomy varying from 2% to 15%. In addition, operative times were relatively short, ranging from 29.2 min to 125 min, with a relatively small average estimated blood loss (i.e., minimal to maximally 150 mls).

CONCLUSION

Repeated discectomy was the most commonly performed treatment for same-level recurrent disc herniations. Despite minimal intraoperative blood loss and short operating times, there was a significant risk of durotomy. Notably, patients must be informed that more extensive bone removal for treating recurrent disc increases the risk for instability warranting subsequent fusion.

摘要

背景

复发性椎间盘突出症仍是脊柱外科手术中的一项挑战。尽管一些作者推荐再次进行椎间盘切除术,但其他作者则采用更具侵入性的二次融合术。在此,我们回顾了2017年至2022年关于单纯通过再次椎间盘切除术治疗复发性椎间盘突出症的安全性/有效性的文献。

方法

我们对复发性腰椎间盘突出症的文献检索包括;医学文献数据库、PubMed、谷歌学术和考克兰数据库。我们重点关注所进行的椎间盘切除术的类型、围手术期发病率、成本、手术时长、疼痛评分以及继发性硬脊膜撕裂的发生率。

结果

我们确定了769例病例,其中包括126例显微椎间盘切除术和643例内镜下椎间盘切除术。椎间盘复发率在1%至25%之间,伴随的继发性硬脊膜切开术发生率在2%至15%之间。此外,手术时间相对较短,从29.2分钟到125分钟不等,平均估计失血量相对较少(即最少至最多150毫升)。

结论

再次椎间盘切除术是治疗同节段复发性椎间盘突出症最常用的方法。尽管术中失血量极少且手术时间短,但存在硬脊膜切开术的重大风险。值得注意的是,必须告知患者,为治疗复发性椎间盘而进行更广泛的骨质切除会增加不稳定的风险,从而需要后续进行融合术。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验