• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉旁路手术后的 5 年住院再入院率与非体外循环手术和性别相关。

Five-Year Hospital Readmission After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the Association With Off-Pump Surgery and Sex.

机构信息

Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York NY USA.

Department of Cardiac Surgery Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal Montreal Quebec Canada.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):e028063. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028063. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.122.028063
PMID:37026546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10227255/
Abstract

Background Limited data exist on long-term readmission and its association with patient and procedural characteristics after coronary artery bypass grafting. We aimed to investigate 5-year readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting and specifically focus on the role of sex and off-pump surgery. Methods and Results We performed a post hoc analysis of the CORONARY (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [CABG] Off or On Pump Revascularization) trial, involving 4623 patients. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission, and the secondary outcome was cardiac readmission. Cox models were used to investigate the association of outcomes with sex and off-pump surgery. Hazard function for sex was studied over time using a flexible, fully parametric model, and time-segmented analyses were performed accordingly. Rho coefficient was calculated for the correlation between readmission and long-term mortality. Median follow-up was 4.4 years (interquartile range, 2.9-5.4 years). The cumulative incidence rates of all-cause and cardiac readmission were 29.4% and 8.2% at 5 years, respectively. Off-pump surgery was not associated with either all-cause or cardiac readmission. The hazard for all-cause readmission in women over time was constantly higher than the hazard for men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.04-1.40]; =0.011). Time-segmented analyses confirmed the higher risk for all-cause (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05-1.40]; <0.001) and cardiac (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.03-1.69]; =0.033) readmission in women after the first 3 years of follow-up. All-cause readmission was strongly correlated with long-term all-cause mortality (Rho, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.66]), whereas cardiac readmission was strongly correlated with long-term cardiovascular mortality (Rho, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.13-0.86]). Conclusions Readmission rates are substantial at 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting and are higher in women but not with off-pump surgery. Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT00463294.

摘要

背景

关于冠状动脉旁路移植术后的长期再入院情况及其与患者和手术特点的关系,目前数据有限。我们旨在研究冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的再入院情况,并特别关注性别和非体外循环手术的作用。

方法和结果

我们对 CORONARY(冠状动脉旁路移植术[CABG]体外或非体外循环再灌注)试验进行了事后分析,该试验纳入了 4623 例患者。主要结局是全因再入院,次要结局是心脏再入院。使用 Cox 模型来研究结局与性别和非体外循环手术的关系。使用灵活的完全参数模型研究性别与时间的危险函数,并相应地进行时间分段分析。计算再入院和长期死亡率之间的 Rho 系数。中位随访时间为 4.4 年(四分位距,2.9-5.4 年)。5 年时全因和心脏再入院的累积发生率分别为 29.4%和 8.2%。非体外循环手术与全因或心脏再入院均无关。随着时间的推移,女性全因再入院的风险始终高于男性(危险比[HR],1.21[95%CI,1.04-1.40];=0.011)。时间分段分析证实,女性在随访的前 3 年之后,全因(HR,1.21[95%CI,1.05-1.40];<0.001)和心脏(HR,1.26[95%CI,1.03-1.69];=0.033)再入院的风险更高。全因再入院与长期全因死亡率密切相关(Rho,0.60[95%CI,0.48-0.66]),而心脏再入院与长期心血管死亡率密切相关(Rho,0.60[95%CI,0.13-0.86])。

结论

冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的再入院率仍然很高,女性的再入院率更高,但与非体外循环手术无关。

注册网址

http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/;唯一标识符:NCT00463294。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/b541b0485ff5/JAH3-12-e028063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/7d284c41144f/JAH3-12-e028063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/8b6e2ca6c998/JAH3-12-e028063-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/161cb16c8d39/JAH3-12-e028063-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/b541b0485ff5/JAH3-12-e028063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/7d284c41144f/JAH3-12-e028063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/8b6e2ca6c998/JAH3-12-e028063-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/161cb16c8d39/JAH3-12-e028063-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5d4/10227255/b541b0485ff5/JAH3-12-e028063-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Five-Year Hospital Readmission After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the Association With Off-Pump Surgery and Sex.冠状动脉旁路手术后的 5 年住院再入院率与非体外循环手术和性别相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):e028063. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028063. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
2
Is the second internal thoracic artery better than the radial artery in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? A propensity score-matched follow-up study.在非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中,第二根胸廓内动脉是否优于桡动脉?一项倾向评分匹配的随访研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
3
Five-Year Outcome After Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗老年患者的 5 年结果。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 16;139(16):1865-1871. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035857.
4
Early and long-term outcomes in the elderly: comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques in 1191 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.老年人的早期和长期预后:1191例接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者非体外循环与体外循环技术的比较
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Sep;136(3):657-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.069. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
5
On-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients needing at least two grafts: comparative outcomes at 20 years.需要至少两根移植血管的患者的体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术:20年的比较结果
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Mar 1;57(3):512-519. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz261.
6
Female sex is not a risk factor for post procedural mortality in coronary bypass surgery in the elderly: A secondary analysis of the GOPCABE trial.女性并非老年冠状动脉搭桥手术术后死亡率的危险因素:GOPCABE试验的二次分析
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0184038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184038. eCollection 2017.
7
Long-Term Outcomes After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Experienced Surgeons.经验丰富的外科医生施行非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 25;72(13):1478-1486. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.029.
8
On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients older than 60 years: five-year follow-up of MASS III trial.60岁以上患者的体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术:MASS III试验的五年随访
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Aug 5;9:127. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-136.
9
Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2359-2368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
10
Comparison between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe lesions at the circumflex artery territory: 5-year follow-up of the MASS III trial.回旋支动脉区域严重病变患者非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:MASS III试验的5年随访
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;47(3):455-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu216. Epub 2014 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Predictors of Hospital Readmission within 5 Years Following CABG: Cohort Analysis of the REPLICCAR II Database.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后5年内再次入院的术前预测因素:REPLICCAR II数据库的队列分析
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Feb;122(2):e20240420. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240420.
2
Survival and Mid-Term Outcomes of On Pump vs. Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis in A First Peruvian Registry.在泵与非在泵冠状动脉旁路移植术的生存和中期结果:秘鲁首个注册研究中的倾向评分匹配分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Nov 28;e20230242(e20230242):e20230242. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0242.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of sex on outcomes after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏手术后性别对结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Nov 15;343:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
2
Coronary artery bypass surgery in the UK, trends in activity and outcomes from a 15-year complete national series.英国的冠状动脉旁路手术:15 年完整国家系列的活动趋势和结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 24;61(2):449-456. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab391.
3
Sex differences in outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.
Rehospitalization After PCI vs CABG for Left Main Disease: Refocusing Our Lens.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗左主干病变后的再住院情况:重新审视我们的视角。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Mar 19;83(11):1082-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.01.028.
冠状动脉旁路移植术后结局的性别差异:个体患者数据的汇总分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 28;43(1):18-28. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab504.
4
Patient and hospital factors associated with 30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后 30 天再入院相关的患者和医院因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 10;16(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01556-1.
5
Predictors of unplanned 30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.冠状动脉搭桥术后30天非计划再入院的预测因素:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Oct 27;20(7):717-725. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab023.
6
Incidence, Cost, and Risk Factors for Readmission After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后再入院的发生率、成本和危险因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jun;107(6):1782-1789. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.077. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2018 Update on Research: Outcomes Analysis, Quality Improvement, and Patient Safety.美国胸外科医师学会成人心脏外科学数据库:2018 年研究更新:结果分析、质量改进和患者安全。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jul;106(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.052.
8
Five-Year Outcomes after Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术 5 年结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2359-2368. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601564. Epub 2016 Oct 23.
9
The Impact of EuroSCORE II Risk Factors on Prediction of Long-Term Mortality.欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)风险因素对长期死亡率预测的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
10
Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 19;374(20):1954-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1406944.