• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的血运重建导致中期下肢保肢率降低。

Revascularisation of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Patients with no Pedal Arteries Leads to Lower Midterm Limb Salvage.

机构信息

Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy.

Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;65(6):878-886. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.03.043. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.03.043
PMID:37028588
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) involving the infragenicular arteries is treated by distal angioplasty or pedal bypass; however, this is not always possible, due to chronically occluded pedal arteries (no patent pedal artery, N-PPA). This pattern represents a hurdle to successful revascularisation, which must be limited to the proximal arteries. The aim of the study was to analyse the outcome of patients with CLTI and N-PPA after a proximal revascularisation.

METHODS

All patients with CLTI submitted to revascularisation in a single centre (2019 - 2020) were analysed. All angiograms were reviewed to identify N-PPA, defined as total obstruction of all pedal arteries. Revascularisation was performed with proximal surgical, endovascular, and hybrid procedures. Early and midterm survival, wound healing, limb salvage, and patency rates were compared between N-PPA and patients with one or more patent pedal artery (PPA).

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighteen procedures were performed. One hundred and forty of 218 (64.2%) patients were male, mean age 73.2 ± 10.6 years. The procedure was surgical in 64/218 (29.4%) cases, endovascular in 138/218 (63.3%), and hybrid in 16/218 (7.3%). N-PPA was present in 60/218 (27.5%) cases. Eleven of 60 (18.3%) cases were treated surgically, 43/60 (71.7%) by endovascular and 6/60 (10%) by hybrid procedures. Technical success was similar in the two groups (N-PPA 85% vs. PPA 82.3%, p = .42). At a mean follow up of 24.5 ± 10.2 months, survival (N-PPA 93.7 ± 3.5% vs. PPA 95.3 ± 2.1%, p = .22) and primary patency (N-PPA 53.1 ± 8.1% vs. PPA 55.2 ± 5%, p = .56) were similar. Limb salvage was significantly lower in N-PPA patients (N-PPA 71.4 ± 6.6% vs. PPA 81.5 ± 3.4%, p = .042); N-PPA was an independent predictor of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR] 2.02, 1.07 - 3.82, p = .038) together with age > 73 years (HR 2.32, 1.17 - 4.57, p = .012) and haemodialysis (2.84, 1.48 - 5.43, p = .002).

CONCLUSION

N-PPA is not uncommon in patients with CLTI. This condition does not hamper technical success, primary patency, and midterm survival; however, midterm limb salvage is significantly lower than in patients with PPA. This should be considered in the decision making process.

摘要

目的

涉及膝下动脉的慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)通过远端血管成形术或足背旁路治疗;然而,由于慢性闭塞的足背动脉(无通畅的足背动脉,N-PPA),这并不总是可行的。这种模式代表了成功再血管化的障碍,必须将其限制在近端动脉。本研究的目的是分析 CLTI 合并 N-PPA 患者在近端再血管化后的结果。

方法

分析了 2019 年至 2020 年在单一中心接受再血管化治疗的所有 CLTI 患者。所有血管造影均进行复查以识别 N-PPA,定义为所有足背动脉完全阻塞。再血管化采用近端手术、血管内和杂交手术进行。比较 N-PPA 患者与存在 1 条或多条通畅足背动脉(PPA)患者的早期和中期生存率、伤口愈合、肢体存活率和通畅率。

结果

共进行了 218 例手术。218 例患者中 140 例(64.2%)为男性,平均年龄 73.2±10.6 岁。64/218(29.4%)例为手术治疗,138/218(63.3%)例为血管内治疗,16/218(7.3%)例为杂交治疗。60/218(27.5%)例存在 N-PPA。11/60(18.3%)例接受手术治疗,43/60(71.7%)例接受血管内治疗,6/60(10%)例接受杂交治疗。两组的技术成功率相似(N-PPA 85% vs. PPA 82.3%,p=0.42)。平均随访 24.5±10.2 个月时,生存率(N-PPA 93.7±3.5% vs. PPA 95.3±2.1%,p=0.22)和原发性通畅率(N-PPA 53.1±8.1% vs. PPA 55.2±5%,p=0.56)相似。N-PPA 患者的肢体存活率明显较低(N-PPA 71.4±6.6% vs. PPA 81.5±3.4%,p=0.042);N-PPA 是主要截肢的独立预测因素(风险比[HR]2.02,1.07-3.82,p=0.038),与年龄>73 岁(HR 2.32,1.17-4.57,p=0.012)和血液透析(2.84,1.48-5.43,p=0.002)相关。

结论

N-PPA 在 CLTI 患者中并不少见。这种情况不会妨碍技术成功率、原发性通畅率和中期生存率;然而,中期肢体存活率明显低于 PPA 患者。在决策过程中应考虑到这一点。

相似文献

1
Revascularisation of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in Patients with no Pedal Arteries Leads to Lower Midterm Limb Salvage.慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的血运重建导致中期下肢保肢率降低。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;65(6):878-886. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.03.043. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
Vein bypass first vs. best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia due to infra-popliteal disease: the BASIL-2 RCT.静脉旁路术优先与最佳血管内治疗优先血运重建策略治疗下肢严重缺血性疾病:BASIL-2 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(65):1-72. doi: 10.3310/YTFV4524.
3
Midterm Outcomes of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Combined with Inflow and Outflow Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血常见股动脉内膜切除术联合流入道和流出道血管内治疗的中期结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Jun;59(6):947-955. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
4
Bypass Surgery Provides Better Outcomes Compared with Endovascular Therapy in the Composite Endpoint Comprising Relief from Rest Pain, Wound Healing, Limb Salvage, and Survival after Infra-inguinal Revascularisation in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.在慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者中,旁路手术在包括缓解静息痛、伤口愈合、肢体挽救和生存的复合终点方面优于血管内治疗。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;63(4):588-593. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.043. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Editor's Choice - Impact of Endovascular Pedal Artery Revascularisation on Wound Healing in Patients With Critical Limb Ischaemia.编辑精选 - 腔内足动脉血运重建对严重肢体缺血患者伤口愈合的影响。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Dec;58(6):854-863. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.034. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
6
The natural history of chronic limb-threatening ischemia after technical failure of endovascular intervention.腔内介入治疗技术失败后慢性肢体严重缺血的自然病程。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Sep;78(3):737-744. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.04.034. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Impact of angiosome- and nonangiosome-targeted peroneal bypass on limb salvage and healing in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.血管体靶向和非血管体靶向腓动脉旁路移植术对慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者肢体挽救及愈合的影响
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1479-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.074. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
8
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.
9
Outcomes of a bypass-first strategy in chronic limb-threatening ischemia based on the Global Vascular Guidelines.基于全球血管指南的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者采用先旁路手术策略的治疗结果
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.06.103. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Pedal medial arterial calcification influences the outcomes of isolated infra-malleolar interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.足部内侧动脉钙化影响慢性肢体威胁性缺血的单纯踝下介入治疗的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Sep;80(3):800-810.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.042. Epub 2024 Apr 20.