Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011.
Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Jun;106(6):4336-4352. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22809. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Subacute rumen acidosis may cause postruminal intestinal barrier dysfunction, but this does not appear to be due to increased hindgut fermentation. Alternatively, intestinal hyperpermeability may be explained by the plethora of potentially harmful substances (e.g., ethanol, endotoxin, and amines) produced in the rumen during subacute rumen acidosis, which are difficult to isolate in traditional in vivo experiments. Therefore, objectives were to evaluate whether abomasal infusion of acidotic rumen fluid collected from donor (Donor) cows elicits systemic inflammation or alters metabolism or production in healthy recipients. Ten rumen-cannulated lactating dairy cows [249 ± 63 d in milk; 753 ± 32 kg of body weight (BW)] were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 abomasal infusion treatments: (1) healthy rumen fluid (HF; 5 L/h; n = 5) or (2) acidotic rumen fluid (AF; 5 L/h; n = 5) infused. Eight rumen-cannulated cows [4 dry, 4 lactating (lactating = 391 ± 220 d in milk); 760 ± 70 kg of BW] were used as Donor cows. All 18 cows were acclimated to a high-fiber diet (46% neutral detergent fiber; 14% starch) during an 11-d prefeeding period during which rumen fluid was collected for the eventual infusion into HF cows. During period (P) 1 (5 d), baseline data were obtained and on d 5 Donor were corn-challenged (2.75% BW ground corn after 16 h of 75% feed restriction). Cows were fasted until 36 h relative to rumen acidosis induction (RAI), and data were collected through 96 h RAI. At 12 h RAI, an additional 0.50% BW of ground corn was added, and acidotic fluid collections began (7 L/Donor every 2 h; 6 M HCl was added to collected fluid until pH was between 5.0 and 5.2). On d 1 of P2 (4 d), HF/AF cows were abomasally infused with their respective treatments for 16 h, and data were collected for 96 h relative to the first infusion. Data were analyzed in SAS (SAS Institute Inc.) using PROC MIXED. Following the corn challenge in the Donor cows, rumen pH only mildly decreased at nadir (pH = 5.64 at 8 h RAI) and remained above the desired threshold for both acute (5.2) and subacute (5.6) acidosis. In contrast, fecal and blood pH markedly decreased to acidotic levels (nadir = 4.65 and 7.28 at 36 and 30 h RAI, respectively), and fecal pH remained below 5 from 22 to 36 h RAI. In Donor cows, dry matter intake remained decreased through d 4 (36% relative to baseline) and serum amyloid A and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein markedly increased by 48 h RAI in Donor cows (30- and 3-fold, respectively). In cows that received the abomasal infusions, fecal pH decreased in AF from 6 to 12 h relative to the first infusion (7.07 vs. 6.33) compared with HF; however, milk yield, dry matter intake, energy-corrected milk, rectal temperature, serum amyloid A, and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein were unaffected. Overall, the corn challenge did not cause subacute rumen acidosis but markedly decreased fecal and blood pH and stimulated a delayed inflammatory response in the Donor cows. Abomasal infusion of rumen fluid from corn-challenged Donor cows decreased fecal pH but did not cause inflammation, nor did it create an immune-activated phenotype in recipient cows.
亚急性瘤胃酸中毒可能导致瘤后肠道屏障功能障碍,但这似乎不是由于后肠发酵增加所致。相反,肠道通透性增加可能是由于亚急性瘤胃酸中毒期间在瘤胃中产生的大量潜在有害物质(例如乙醇、内毒素和胺)引起的,这些物质在传统的体内实验中很难分离。因此,本研究旨在评估从供体奶牛采集的酸中毒瘤胃液经瘤胃灌注是否会引起全身炎症或改变健康受体的代谢或生产。10 头泌乳奶牛[泌乳天数 249 ± 63 d;体重 753 ± 32 kg]随机分为 2 个瘤胃灌注处理组之一:(1)健康瘤胃液(HF;5 L/h;n = 5)或(2)酸中毒瘤胃液(AF;5 L/h;n = 5)。8 头瘤胃插管奶牛[4 头干奶牛,4 头泌乳奶牛(泌乳 = 391 ± 220 d);体重 760 ± 70 kg]用作供体奶牛。所有 18 头奶牛在高纤维饮食(中性洗涤纤维 46%;淀粉 14%)适应期内进行了 11 天预饲,在此期间收集瘤胃液,最终用于 HF 奶牛的灌注。在第 1 期(P1;5 天)获得基线数据,第 5 天供体奶牛接受玉米挑战(在 75%饲料限制后 16 小时添加 2.75% BW 粉碎玉米)。奶牛禁食至瘤胃酸中毒诱导(RAI)后 36 小时,在 RAI 期间收集数据 96 小时。在 RAI 后 12 小时,额外添加 0.50% BW 粉碎玉米,并开始收集酸中毒瘤胃液(每头供体每 2 小时收集 7 L;向收集的液体中添加 6 M HCl,直到 pH 值在 5.0 和 5.2 之间)。在第 2 期(P2)第 1 天(4 天),HF/AF 奶牛分别进行 16 小时的瘤胃灌注,在第一次灌注后 96 小时内收集数据。使用 SAS(SAS Institute Inc.)中的 PROC MIXED 分析数据。在供体奶牛接受玉米挑战后,瘤胃 pH 值仅在低谷时轻度下降(在 RAI 后 8 小时时 pH 值为 5.64),并且仍高于急性(5.2)和亚急性(5.6)酸中毒的理想阈值。相比之下,粪便和血液 pH 值显著下降至酸中毒水平(低谷分别为 36 和 30 小时 RAI 时的 4.65 和 7.28),粪便 pH 值从 22 小时到 36 小时 RAI 一直低于 5。在供体奶牛中,干物质采食量一直持续到第 4 天(与基线相比减少 36%),血清淀粉样蛋白 A 和脂多糖结合蛋白在供体奶牛中分别在 RAI 后 48 小时增加 30 倍和 3 倍。在接受瘤胃灌注的奶牛中,与 HF 相比,AF 从第 1 次灌注开始后 6 小时到 12 小时,粪便 pH 值下降(7.07 比 6.33);然而,牛奶产量、干物质采食量、校正能量奶、直肠温度、血清淀粉样蛋白 A 和脂多糖结合蛋白不受影响。总体而言,玉米挑战并未引起亚急性瘤胃酸中毒,但显著降低了粪便和血液 pH 值,并在供体奶牛中刺激了延迟的炎症反应。从玉米挑战的供体奶牛采集的瘤胃液经瘤胃灌注可降低粪便 pH 值,但不会引起炎症,也不会使受体奶牛产生免疫激活表型。