Weber J, Dobek K
Ophthalmologica. 1986;192(2):88-96. doi: 10.1159/000309619.
100 eyes with suspected or proven glaucoma were examined with the Humphrey Field Analyzer 620 with 30-1 and 30-2 threshold tests, complementary 6 degrees grids which combine to a 4.2 degrees grid. The two tests were compared with each other in the resulting 68 pathological fields. 29 of them showed obvious differences in detection of scotomas. In 11 fields, the differences were so great that isolated consideration would have led to an incorrect staging of the glaucoma. Therefore, at present both tests should be applied in glaucoma cases. The frequency of different scotoma detection per test location was more than 10 times higher in the center than in the periphery. It is suggested that a program is developed with a 3 degrees grid within 10 degrees eccentricity, a 4.2 degrees grid between 10 degrees and 20 degrees and a 6 degrees grid between 20 degrees and 30 degrees eccentricity.
对100只疑似或确诊青光眼的眼睛使用Humphrey视野分析仪620进行检查，采用30-1和30-2阈值测试，以及互补的6度网格，这些网格组合成一个4.2度的网格。在由此产生的68个病理视野中，对这两项测试进行了相互比较。其中29个视野在暗点检测方面显示出明显差异。在11个视野中，差异非常大，单独考虑会导致青光眼分期错误。因此，目前在青光眼病例中应同时应用这两项测试。每个测试位置不同暗点检测的频率在中心比在外周高10倍以上。建议开发一个程序，在偏心度10度以内采用3度网格，在10度至20度之间采用4.2度网格，在20度至30度偏心度之间采用6度网格。
