Center for Neuroscience & Society, The Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 18;120(16):e2222069120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2222069120. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
Why is lower socioeconomic status associated with higher rates of depression? And, is the surplus of depression at lower SES just more of the same type as depression found at higher levels, or is it distinctive? We addressed these questions by examining the relations among SES, amygdala volume, and symptoms of depression in healthy young adults. Amygdala volume, a risk factor for depression, does not synergize with SES in a diathesis-stress relation, nor does it mediate the relation of SES to depression. Rather, SES and amygdala volume are independent, additive risk factors. They are also associated with different depression symptoms and, whereas perceived stress fully mediates the relation of SES to depression, it has no relation to amygdala volume. These findings suggest heterogeneity of depression across the socioeconomic spectrum, with implications for treatment selection as well as for future genetic and brain studies.
为什么社会经济地位较低与抑郁症的发病率较高有关?而且,社会经济地位较低的人群中抑郁症状是否仅仅是与较高社会经济地位人群中发现的抑郁症状类型相同,还是具有独特性?我们通过研究健康年轻成年人的社会经济地位、杏仁核体积和抑郁症状之间的关系来回答这些问题。杏仁核体积是抑郁的一个风险因素,它不会与社会经济地位在素质-压力关系中协同作用,也不会介导社会经济地位与抑郁之间的关系。相反,社会经济地位和杏仁核体积是独立的、累加的风险因素。它们还与不同的抑郁症状相关,而感知压力完全介导了社会经济地位与抑郁之间的关系,与杏仁核体积无关。这些发现表明,在整个社会经济范围内,抑郁存在异质性,这对治疗选择以及未来的遗传和大脑研究都具有重要意义。