Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Aug;129(6):646-657. doi: 10.1037/abn0000530. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
The past decades of research on predictors of depression have frequently emphasized interactive diathesis-stress questions: What kinds of vulnerabilities under stressful circumstances increase risk of developing depression? This study addresses 3 theoretically important gaps in our knowledge regarding diathesis-stress models of depression: the role of temperament (neuroticism), interactive versus additive effects of neuroticism-stress relationships, and effects of stressor characteristics (acute vs. chronic, major vs. minor events, interpersonal vs. noninterpersonal content). We addressed these gaps in the prediction of major depressive episodes (MDEs) in a sample of high schoolers ( = 559) oversampled for high neuroticism and assessed for presence of MDEs annually for 5 years. Survival analyses provided relatively consistent support for the main effects of the broad vulnerability factor of the general neuroticism factor, acute stressors, and chronic stressors in the prediction of MDEs. In contrast, the majority of our analyses failed to support interactive neuroticism-stress accounts of MDE risk. Integrating our results with the extant literature reinforces the notion that both the general neuroticism factor and stress prospectively predict depressive disorders and highlight that their main effects are significantly larger than their interaction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
过去几十年的抑郁症预测因素研究经常强调素质-应激相互作用问题:在应激环境下,哪些脆弱性会增加患抑郁症的风险?本研究针对我们关于抑郁症素质-应激模型的知识中的 3 个重要空白:气质(神经质)的作用、神经质-应激关系的交互作用与相加作用,以及应激源特征(急性与慢性、重大与轻微事件、人际与非人际内容)的作用。我们在一个高中生样本(n=559)中考察了这些空白,该样本对神经质进行了过采样,并在 5 年内每年评估一次是否存在重度抑郁发作(MDE)。生存分析为广泛的一般神经质因素这一脆弱性因素、急性应激源和慢性应激源对 MDE 的预测提供了相对一致的支持。相比之下,我们的大多数分析都未能支持 MDE 风险的神经质交互作用解释。将我们的结果与现有文献相结合,强化了这样一种观念,即一般神经质因素和应激都能前瞻性地预测抑郁障碍,并强调它们的主要作用明显大于它们的相互作用。