Suppr超能文献

一项全国性研究:抗抑郁药起始治疗与癫痫发作风险

A nationwide study of initiation of antidepressant pharmacotherapy and the risk of seizures.

机构信息

Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center-Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Indiana University - Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2023 May;192:107134. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107134. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to examine whether antidepressant initiation increases the risk of hospitalizations and unplanned outpatient visits for seizures. Research has provided conflicting evidence as to whether antidepressant initiation causes seizures. Because epilepsy and depression are comorbid, this remains an important question, particularly in the care of those already at-risk for seizures.

METHODS

We used Swedish-register data, including 658,766 antidepressant initiators and 1:1 age-, region-, and sex-matched non-initiators, ages 12-65. We used filled prescriptions to identify any antidepressant and serotonergic antidepressant and inpatient hospitalizations and unplanned outpatient (to avoid coding routine epilepsy maintenance as a seizure) visits to identify seizures, respectively. We first compared seizure visit incidence between antidepressant-initiators and matched non-users in the year following initiation from 2006 to 2013. To examine seizure risk over months pre- and post-initiation, within-individual analyses compared risk during the month one year prior to initiation with all subsequent months. We examined associations for any antidepressant and serotonergic antidepressants, as well as for any initiator and initiators with a history of seizures.

RESULTS

Our matched-cohort results showed higher incidence of seizure visits among antidepressant users compared with non-users (e.g., adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR]=3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.83-3.49). In within-individual analyses, the months after initiation were associated with higher incidence of seizure visits when compared with the month one year prior to initiation (e.g., one month after initiation IRR=1.96, 95%CI=1.64-2.34), but in individuals with a seizure history we observed weaker or no associations in the months after initiation (e.g., two months after initiation IRR=1.12, 95%CI=0.87-1.45). Notably, irrespective of potential seizure history, the months preceding initiation were associated with the greatest risk (e.g., one month before initiation IRR=2.86, 95% CI=2.42-3.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there may be an elevated risk of seizures during antidepressant treatment, though the period of highest risk was before the initiation of antidepressants. Risk for seizure visits was lower among individuals with a history of prior seizures, which may be reassuring for the clinical care of these patients or indicate lack of treatment seeking following seizures. This study highlights the need to consider seizure risk across time; the failure to account for these dynamics may help account for discrepant findings in previous studies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨抗抑郁药的起始治疗是否会增加癫痫发作的住院和非计划门诊就诊风险。研究结果对抗抑郁药起始治疗是否会引发癫痫存在争议。由于癫痫和抑郁症共病,这仍然是一个重要的问题,尤其是在那些已经存在癫痫发作风险的患者的治疗中。

方法

我们使用了瑞典登记数据,包括 658766 名抗抑郁药起始治疗者和年龄、地区和性别匹配的 1:1 名非起始治疗者,年龄为 12-65 岁。我们使用处方记录来确定任何抗抑郁药和 5-羟色胺能抗抑郁药,并分别确定住院和非计划门诊(以避免将常规癫痫维持治疗编码为癫痫发作)就诊以确定癫痫发作。我们首先比较了 2006 年至 2013 年抗抑郁药起始治疗者在起始治疗后一年内与匹配的未使用者之间的癫痫发作就诊发生率。为了在起始治疗前和起始治疗后几个月内检查癫痫发作风险,个体内分析将起始前一年的一个月与所有后续月份进行了比较。我们检查了任何抗抑郁药和 5-羟色胺能抗抑郁药的关联,以及有癫痫发作史的任何起始治疗者和起始治疗者的关联。

结果

我们的匹配队列结果显示,与非使用者相比,抗抑郁药使用者癫痫发作就诊的发生率更高(例如,调整后的发病率比[IRR]=3.14,95%置信区间[CI]=2.83-3.49)。在个体内分析中,与起始前一年的一个月相比,起始后几个月的癫痫发作就诊发生率更高(例如,起始后一个月 IRR=1.96,95%CI=1.64-2.34),但在有癫痫发作史的个体中,我们观察到起始后几个月的关联较弱或不存在(例如,起始后两个月 IRR=1.12,95%CI=0.87-1.45)。值得注意的是,无论是否存在潜在的癫痫发作史,起始前几个月与最大风险相关(例如,起始前一个月 IRR=2.86,95%CI=2.42-3.38)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在抗抑郁治疗期间可能存在癫痫发作风险增加,但风险最高的时期是在开始抗抑郁治疗之前。有癫痫发作史的个体癫痫发作就诊的风险较低,这可能为这些患者的临床治疗提供安慰,或者表明癫痫发作后缺乏治疗需求。这项研究强调了需要考虑跨时间的癫痫发作风险;未能考虑这些动态可能有助于解释先前研究中存在的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5290/10265535/4748f8602f5a/nihms-1891337-f0001.jpg

相似文献

2
Antidepressants for people with epilepsy and depression.用于癫痫伴抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 3;2014(12):CD010682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010682.pub2.
4
Antidepressants for people with epilepsy and depression.抗抑郁药治疗癫痫合并抑郁患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 16;4(4):CD010682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010682.pub3.
7
Clinical and economic burden of breakthrough seizures.突破性癫痫发作的临床和经济负担。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Oct;51:40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for depression in patients with epilepsy: A meta-analysis.癫痫患者抑郁的风险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 May;106:107030. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107030. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
5
Second-generation anti-depressants and risk of new-onset seizures in the elderly.第二代抗抑郁药与老年人新发癫痫的风险。
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2018 Dec;56(12):1179-1184. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2018.1483025. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验