• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆亚型检测中的患者特异性认知概况:一项提议。

Patient-specific cognitive profiles in the detection of dementia subtypes: A proposal.

作者信息

Mueller Jonathan, Cammermeyer Grethe

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Saint Francis Memorial Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA.

WhidbeyHealth Medical Center, Coupeville, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Oct;19(10):4743-4752. doi: 10.1002/alz.13049. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1002/alz.13049
PMID:37037456
Abstract

Many physicians rely on sum score cognitive screening tests to evaluate patients for cognitive decline. Because the vast majority of cognitively impaired patients never receive more extensive testing, the results of these screening tests impact patients and their family members profoundly. No previous study has examined whether the metrics used by the popular Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Saint Louis University Mental Status tests reliably identify single-domain deficits or allow clinicians to adequately track disease progression. We compare side by side the metrics used by these three tests to highlight the differences in the ways they measure domain impairments. We then contrast the sum score approach to cognitive screening with brief domain-specific tests that use extended metrics in each domain examined. Last, we suggest that moderate-to-severe domain-specific deficits on these tests should lead physicians to anticipate specific functional problems and alert family members.

摘要

许多医生依靠综合评分认知筛查测试来评估患者的认知衰退情况。由于绝大多数认知受损患者从未接受过更全面的测试,这些筛查测试的结果对患者及其家属有着深远影响。此前尚无研究探讨常用的简易精神状态检查表、蒙特利尔认知评估量表和圣路易斯大学精神状态测试所使用的指标能否可靠地识别单领域缺陷,或能否让临床医生充分追踪疾病进展。我们将这三项测试所使用的指标进行并列比较,以突出它们在测量领域损伤方式上的差异。然后,我们将认知筛查的综合评分方法与在每个检查领域使用扩展指标的简短特定领域测试进行对比。最后,我们建议这些测试中出现的中度至重度特定领域缺陷应促使医生预见到特定的功能问题,并提醒家属。

相似文献

1
Patient-specific cognitive profiles in the detection of dementia subtypes: A proposal.痴呆亚型检测中的患者特异性认知概况:一项提议。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Oct;19(10):4743-4752. doi: 10.1002/alz.13049. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
I Have to Pay to Use the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: What Should I Do?我必须付费才能使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表:我该怎么办?
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;62(2):253-255. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
3
Responsiveness to Change of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination, and SCOPA-Cog in Non-Demented Patients with Parkinson's Disease.蒙特利尔认知评估量表、简易精神状态检查和 SCOPA-Cog 在非痴呆帕金森病患者中的变化反应性。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(4-6):187-197. doi: 10.1159/000496454. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Cognitive profiles and optimal cut-offs for routine cognitive tests in elderly individuals with Parkinson's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and normal cognition.认知特征及常规认知测试在老年帕金森病、帕金森病痴呆、阿尔茨海默病及认知正常个体中的最佳截断值。
Psychogeriatrics. 2020 Jan;20(1):20-27. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12451. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
5
6
Low Accuracy of Brief Cognitive Tests in Tracking Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in an Asian Elderly Cohort.简短认知测试在追踪亚洲老年队列纵向认知衰退中的准确性较低。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(1):409-416. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170831.
7
Sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III to everyday activity impairments in dementia: an exploratory study.简易精神状态检查、蒙特利尔认知评估和 Addenbrooke 认知评估量表 III 对痴呆患者日常活动障碍的敏感性:一项探索性研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;32(10):1085-1093. doi: 10.1002/gps.4570. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
A comparison between the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in assessing cognitive function in patients with diabetes-related dementia.简易精神状态检查表与蒙特利尔认知评估量表在评估糖尿病相关性痴呆患者认知功能方面的比较。
Psychogeriatrics. 2018 Jan;18(1):72-73. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12277. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
A comparison of test-retest reliability of four cognitive screening tools in people with dementia.痴呆患者四种认知筛查工具重测信度的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jul;44(15):4090-4095. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1891466. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Measurement of Functional Cognition and Complex Everyday Activities in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia: Validity of the Large Allen's Cognitive Level Screen.轻度认知障碍和轻度痴呆老年人的功能性认知与复杂日常活动测量:大型艾伦认知水平筛查的效度
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 May;25(5):471-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.021. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of digital screening tools in detecting cognitive impairment among community-dwelling elderly in Northern China: A large cohort study.数字筛查工具在中国北方社区老年人中检测认知障碍的有效性:一项大型队列研究。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Mar;12(3):100080. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100080. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
2
The Influence of Structural Brain Changes on Cognition in the Context of Healthy Aging: Exploring Mediation Effects Through gBAT-The Graphical Brain Association Tool.结构脑变化对健康老龄化背景下认知的影响:通过 gBAT-图形脑关联工具探索中介效应。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Oct;45(14):e70038. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70038.