• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤(>6cm)的作用:荟萃分析和系统评价。

The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of large pheochromocytomas (>6 cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (University).

Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University Medical School, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1459-1469. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000389.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000389
PMID:37037515
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389469/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) under different routes for the treatment of large pheochromocytomas (PCCs) is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis and systematic review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) Guidelines. Three databases were systematically searched, including Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science. The time frame of the search was set from the creation of the database to October 2022. Perioperative outcomes were divided into two groups according to tumor size: SMALL group (≤6 cm in diameter), LARGE group (>6 cm in diameter).

RESULTS

Eight studies including 600 patients were included. In the LA group, complications was comparable in both groups (SMALL group and LARGE group), and the LARGE group had longer operative time [OT weighted mean difference (WMD)=32.55; 95% CI: 11.17, 53.92; P <0.01], length of stay (LOS WMD=0.82; 95% CI: 0.19, 1.44; P <0.05), more estimated blood loss (EBL WMD=85.26; 95% CI: 20.71, 149.82; P <0.05), hypertension [odds ratio (OR)=3.99; 95% CI: 1.84, 8.65; P <0.01], hypotension (OR=1.84; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.05; P <0.05), and conversion (OR=5.60; 95% CI: 1.56, 20.13; P <0.01). In the transabdominal LA group, OT, LOS, EBL, complications, hypertension, and hypotension were the same in both groups. In the retroperitoneal LA group, complications and hypotension were the same in both groups, while the LARGE group had longer OT (WMD=52.07; 95% CI: 26.95, 77.20; P <0.01), LOS (WMD=0.51; 95% CI: 0.00, 1.01; P <0.05), more EBL (WMD=92.99; 95% CI: 27.70, 158.28; P <0.01) and higher rates of hypertension (OR=6.03; 95% CI: 1.95, 18.61; P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

LA remains a safe and effective approach for large PCC. Transabdominal LA is superior to retroperitoneal LA.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤(PCC)的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。

材料与方法

本荟萃分析和系统评价根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)和 AMSTAR(系统评价方法质量评估)指南进行。系统检索了 Medline、PubMed 和 Web of Science 三个数据库,检索时间从数据库创建到 2022 年 10 月。根据肿瘤大小将围手术期结果分为两组:SMALL 组(直径≤6cm),LARGE 组(直径>6cm)。

结果

共纳入 8 项研究 600 例患者。在 LA 组中,两组的并发症相似,LARGE 组的手术时间更长[OT 加权均数差(WMD)=32.55;95%置信区间:11.17,53.92;P<0.01],住院时间更长[LOS WMD=0.82;95%置信区间:0.19,1.44;P<0.05],估计出血量更多[EBL WMD=85.26;95%置信区间:20.71,149.82;P<0.05],高血压[比值比(OR)=3.99;95%置信区间:1.84,8.65;P<0.01],低血压(OR=1.84;95%置信区间:1.11,3.05;P<0.05)和中转(OR=5.60;95%置信区间:1.56,20.13;P<0.01)的发生率更高。在经腹 LA 组中,OT、LOS、EBL、并发症、高血压和低血压在两组间相同。在经腹膜后 LA 组中,两组的并发症和低血压相同,而 LARGE 组的 OT 更长[WMD=52.07;95%置信区间:26.95,77.20;P<0.01],LOS 更长[WMD=0.51;95%置信区间:0.00,1.01;P<0.05],EBL 更多[WMD=92.99;95%置信区间:27.70,158.28;P<0.01],高血压的发生率更高[OR=6.03;95%置信区间:1.95,18.61;P<0.01]。

结论

LA 仍然是治疗大 PCC 的安全有效的方法。经腹 LA 优于经腹膜后 LA。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/57296df57003/js9-109-1459-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/889e5d555f38/js9-109-1459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/168a28a846c8/js9-109-1459-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/88d3419acda2/js9-109-1459-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/7c4f27f30354/js9-109-1459-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/abbea0d2ccec/js9-109-1459-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/9b8d3984d17e/js9-109-1459-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/8cdfb1498e39/js9-109-1459-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/604a9953605b/js9-109-1459-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/ba1914063a64/js9-109-1459-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/bdef1a145169/js9-109-1459-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/9201924d32c4/js9-109-1459-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/5ff3d02a8d9a/js9-109-1459-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/57296df57003/js9-109-1459-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/889e5d555f38/js9-109-1459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/168a28a846c8/js9-109-1459-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/88d3419acda2/js9-109-1459-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/7c4f27f30354/js9-109-1459-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/abbea0d2ccec/js9-109-1459-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/9b8d3984d17e/js9-109-1459-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/8cdfb1498e39/js9-109-1459-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/604a9953605b/js9-109-1459-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/ba1914063a64/js9-109-1459-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/bdef1a145169/js9-109-1459-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/9201924d32c4/js9-109-1459-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/5ff3d02a8d9a/js9-109-1459-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb6f/10389469/57296df57003/js9-109-1459-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of large pheochromocytomas (>6 cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗大嗜铬细胞瘤(>6cm)的作用:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2023 May 1;109(5):1459-1469. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000389.
2
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic in adrenalectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106853. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106853. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive adrenalectomy versus open adrenalectomy in patients with large adrenal tumors (≥5 cm): A meta-analysis and systematic review.微创肾上腺切除术与开放肾上腺切除术治疗大肾上腺肿瘤(≥5cm)患者的安全性和有效性:Meta 分析和系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106779. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106779. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) vs open adrenalectomy (OA) for pheochromocytoma (PHEO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术(LA)与开放肾上腺切除术(OA)治疗嗜铬细胞瘤(PHEO):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;46(6):991-998. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy using the lateral retroperitoneal approach: Is it a safe and feasible treatment option for pheochromocytomas larger than 6 cm?经侧腹膜后入路腹腔镜肾上腺切除术:对于直径大于6cm的嗜铬细胞瘤,它是一种安全可行的治疗选择吗?
Int J Urol. 2018 May;25(5):414-419. doi: 10.1111/iju.13524. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
6
Comparison of the retroperitoneal versus Transperitoneal laparoscopic Adrenalectomy perioperative outcomes and safety for Pheochromocytoma: a meta-analysis.腹膜后与经腹腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗嗜铬细胞瘤围手术期结果及安全性的比较:一项荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2020 Jan 13;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-0676-4.
7
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy, a safe procedure for pheochromocytoma. A retrospective review of clinical series.腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗嗜铬细胞瘤:一项临床系列回顾性研究。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(2):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.12.007. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
8
Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe and effective alternative to transabdominal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.后腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是治疗嗜铬细胞瘤的一种安全有效的方法,可替代经腹腔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术。
Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.004.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
10
Peri- and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in nonobese versus obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非肥胖与肥胖患者腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的围手术期及术后结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Sep;17(3):430-440. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.116407. Epub 2022 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas-Current Management.嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤——当前的治疗方法
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;17(6):1029. doi: 10.3390/cancers17061029.
2
Pheochromocytoma in MEN2.多发性内分泌腺瘤病2型中的嗜铬细胞瘤
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2025;223:211-235. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-80396-3_8.
3
Clinical efficacy and safety of organ-sparing cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留器官的膀胱切除术的临床疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PeerJ. 2024 Nov 27;12:e18427. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18427. eCollection 2024.
4
Progress in surgical approaches and outcomes of patients with pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤患者手术方法及治疗结果的进展
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jan;39(1):101954. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2024.101954. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
5
Which surgical approach is more favorable for pheochromocytoma of different sizes (< 6 cm vs. ≥ 6 cm)? A single retrospective center experience.不同大小(<6cm 与 ≥6cm)的嗜铬细胞瘤采用哪种手术入路更有利?单中心回顾性经验。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep 11;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03164-w.