Suppr超能文献

临床常规中结构化报告的实施:七年机构经验回顾

Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience.

作者信息

Jorg Tobias, Halfmann Moritz C, Arnhold Gordon, Pinto Dos Santos Daniel, Kloeckner Roman, Düber Christoph, Mildenberger Peter, Jungmann Florian, Müller Lukas

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Insights Imaging. 2023 Apr 11;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01408-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the implementation process of structured reporting (SR) in a tertiary care institution over a period of 7 years.

METHODS

We analysed the content of our image database from January 2016 to December 2022 and compared the numbers of structured reports and free-text reports. For the ten most common SR templates, usage proportions were calculated on a quarterly basis. Annual modality-specific SR usage was calculated for ultrasound, CT, and MRI. During the implementation process, we surveyed radiologists and clinical referring physicians concerning their views on reporting in radiology.

RESULTS

As of December 2022, our reporting platform contained more than 22,000 structured reports. Use of the ten most common SR templates increased markedly since their implementation, leading to a mean SR usage of 77% in Q4 2022. The highest percentages of SR usage were shown for trauma CT, focussed assessment with ultrasound for trauma (FAST), and prostate MRI: 97%, 95%, and 92%, respectively, in 2022. Overall modality-specific SR usage was 17% for ultrasound, 13% for CT, and 6% for MRI in 2022. Both radiologists and referring physicians were more satisfied with structured reports and rated SR better than free-text reporting (FTR) on various attributes.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing SR usage during the period under review and the positive attitude towards SR among both radiologists and clinical referrers show that SR can be successfully implemented. We therefore encourage others to take this step in order to benefit from the advantages of SR.

KEY POINTS

  1. Structured reporting usage increased markedly since its implementation at our institution in 2016. 2. Mean usage for the ten most popular structured reporting templates was 77% in 2022. 3. Both radiologists and referring physicians preferred structured reports over free-text reports. 4. Our data shows that structured reporting can be successfully implemented. 5. We strongly encourage others to implement structured reporting at their institutions.
摘要

背景

评估一家三级医疗机构在7年时间里结构化报告(SR)的实施过程。

方法

我们分析了2016年1月至2022年12月期间影像数据库的内容,比较了结构化报告和自由文本报告的数量。对于十种最常用的SR模板,按季度计算使用比例。计算了超声、CT和MRI的年度特定模态SR使用率。在实施过程中,我们就放射科报告情况对放射科医生和临床转诊医生进行了调查。

结果

截至2022年12月,我们的报告平台包含超过22000份结构化报告。自十种最常用的SR模板实施以来,其使用量显著增加,导致2022年第四季度SR的平均使用率达到77%。2022年,创伤CT、创伤超声重点评估(FAST)和前列腺MRI的SR使用率最高,分别为97%、95%和92%。2022年,超声的总体特定模态SR使用率为17%,CT为13%,MRI为6%。放射科医生和转诊医生对结构化报告都更满意,并且在各种属性方面对SR的评价高于自由文本报告(FTR)。

结论

在审查期间SR使用率不断上升,且放射科医生和临床转诊医生对SR都持积极态度,这表明SR可以成功实施。因此,我们鼓励其他机构采取这一步骤,以便从SR的优势中受益。

关键点

  1. 自2016年在我们机构实施以来,结构化报告的使用量显著增加。2. 2022年十种最受欢迎的结构化报告模板的平均使用率为77%。3. 放射科医生和转诊医生都更喜欢结构化报告而非自由文本报告。4. 我们的数据表明结构化报告可以成功实施。5. 我们强烈鼓励其他机构在其机构实施结构化报告。
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51fa/10086081/45511ee2f5b3/13244_2023_1408_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验