• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带 Impella 5.5 的延长支持:移植、ECMO 和并发症。

Extended Support With the Impella 5.5: Transplant, ECMO, and Complications.

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2023 Jul 1;69(7):642-648. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001931. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000001931
PMID:37039780
Abstract

We report midterm results of Impella 5.5 use with focus placed on bridge-outcomes, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) transition, complications, and risk factors for mortality. A retrospective review of patients implanted with the Impella 5.5 at our medical center was conducted. Forty patients were included with varying bridge strategies. Sixteen (40%) patients were supported for <14 days, 13 (32.5%) for 14-30 days, and 11 (27.5%) for >30 days. Thirty day mortality was 22.5% (9/40). Twenty-five (62.5%) were successfully bridged to transplant or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), while four (10.0%) recovered without the need for any further cardiac support. Five of 11 (60%) patients initially supported with VA-ECMO were either transitioned to durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD; n = 3, 27.3%), transplanted (n = 1, 9.1%), or recovered (n = 1, 9.1%). Of nine patients with >moderate right ventricle (RV) dysfunction, five (55.6%) were successfully bridged to transplant or LVAD. Five (12.5%) patients required interval cannulation to VA-ECMO, often in the setting of RV dysfunction, and all (100%) were successfully transplanted. Lower pulmonary artery (PA) systolic pressure ( P = 0.029), among other factors, was associated with mortality. In summary, the Impella 5.5 may be able to effectively stabilize patients in refractory left ventricular predominant cardiogenic shock for extended durations, allowing time for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and transplant evaluations.

摘要

我们报告了 Impella 5.5 的中期使用结果,重点关注桥接结局、静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)转换、并发症以及死亡的危险因素。对我们医疗中心植入 Impella 5.5 的患者进行了回顾性研究。共纳入 40 例患者,采用不同的桥接策略。16 例(40%)患者的支持时间<14 天,13 例(32.5%)为 14-30 天,11 例(27.5%)>30 天。30 天死亡率为 22.5%(9/40)。25 例(62.5%)成功桥接到移植或持久左心室辅助装置(LVAD),而 4 例(10.0%)无需任何进一步的心脏支持即可恢复。最初接受 VA-ECMO 支持的 11 例患者中有 5 例(60%)转为持久左心室辅助装置(dLVAD;n=3,27.3%)、移植(n=1,9.1%)或恢复(n=1,9.1%)。在 9 例存在中度以上右心室(RV)功能障碍的患者中,5 例(55.6%)成功桥接到移植或 LVAD。5 例(12.5%)患者需要间隔插管至 VA-ECMO,通常在 RV 功能障碍的情况下,所有患者(100%)均成功移植。较低的肺动脉(PA)收缩压(P=0.029)等因素与死亡率相关。总之,Impella 5.5 可有效稳定长时间处于难治性左心室为主型心源性休克的患者,为机械循环支持(MCS)和移植评估提供时间。

相似文献

1
Extended Support With the Impella 5.5: Transplant, ECMO, and Complications.带 Impella 5.5 的延长支持:移植、ECMO 和并发症。
ASAIO J. 2023 Jul 1;69(7):642-648. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001931. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
Meta-Analysis Comparing Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With or Without Impella in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.Meta 分析比较心肺转流术联合或不联合 Impella 在心源休克患者中的应用。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Oct 15;181:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.06.059. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
3
ECMO and Impella Support Strategies as a Bridge to Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和 Impella 支持策略作为心肌梗死后室间隔破裂手术修复的桥接。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 28;58(5):611. doi: 10.3390/medicina58050611.
4
Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.体外生命支持治疗心肌梗死后合并心源性休克时的左心室卸载:外科排气与 Impella 装置。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan 6;34(1):137-144. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab230. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
5
Use of Impella heart pump for management of women with peripartum cardiogenic shock.使用 Impella 心脏泵治疗围产期心源性休克的女性。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Oct;42(10):974-981. doi: 10.1002/clc.23249. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Bridging INTERMACS 1 patients from VA-ECMO to LVAD via Impella 5.0: De-escalate and ambulate.经 Impella 5.0 将 INTERMACS 1 患者从 VA-ECMO 桥接到 LVAD:降级并活动。
J Crit Care. 2020 Jun;57:259-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
7
Impella to unload the left ventricle during peripheral extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.在体外膜肺氧合期间使用 Impella 左心室辅助装置。
ASAIO J. 2013 Sep-Oct;59(5):533-6. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e31829f0e52.
8
Left Ventricular Unloading With Impella Versus IABP in Patients With VA-ECMO: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)患者中使用Impella与主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)进行左心室卸载:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 1;208:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.023. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
9
The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.腋动脉置入Impella 5.0装置在急性心源性休克患者中的作用。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 14;15(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01251-7.
10
Simultaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Percutaneous Left Ventricular Decompression Therapy with Impella Is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.在难治性心源性休克中,同时进行静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合和 Impella 经皮左心室减压治疗与改善结局相关。
ASAIO J. 2019 Jan;65(1):21-28. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000767.

引用本文的文献

1
Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.心源性休克患者使用Impella 5.5进行长期支持:一项单中心回顾性分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 8;14(16):5631. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165631.
2
Impella 5.5 use in women: A multicenter study.女性使用Impella 5.5:一项多中心研究。
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 10;9:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100341. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Recognizing Post-Cardiac Injury Syndrome After Impella 5.5 Insertion in Cardiogenic Shock: A Case-Based Discussion.
认识心源性休克患者植入Impella 5.5后发生的心肌损伤后综合征:基于病例的讨论
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 16;13(7):1737. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071737.
4
Outcomes of prolonged support on surgically implanted microaxial left ventricular assist devices for refractory cardiogenic shock.外科植入式微轴左心室辅助装置对难治性心源性休克长期支持的效果
JTCVS Open. 2025 May 2;25:173-189. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.023. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Multicentre comparison of various microaxial pump devices as a bridge to durable assist device implantation.作为耐用辅助装置植入桥梁的各种微轴流泵装置的多中心比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2552-2564. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15282. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
6
Impella Versus VA-ECMO for Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Preliminary Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Italian Context.意大利背景下因心源性休克患者使用Impella与VA-ECMO的初步成本效益分析
Cardiol Ther. 2025 Jun;14(2):183-198. doi: 10.1007/s40119-025-00404-w. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
7
Contemporary optimal therapeutic strategy with escalation/de-escalation of temporary mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock and advanced heart failure in Japan.日本心源性休克和晚期心力衰竭患者临时机械循环支持的升级/降级当代最佳治疗策略
J Artif Organs. 2025 Jun;28(2):103-109. doi: 10.1007/s10047-024-01471-x. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
8
Impella versus VA-ECMO for the treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock: the Impella Network Project - observational study protocol for cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses.Impella 与 VA-ECMO 治疗心源性休克患者:Impella 网络项目——成本效益和预算影响分析的观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 26;14(6):e078358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078358.
9
Optimizing Perioperative Care for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in High-Risk Patients Supported by Impella 5.5.优化高危患者在Impella 5.5支持下进行室性心动过速消融术的围手术期护理。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 20;16(4):e58642. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58642. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Surgically implanted endovascular, microaxial left ventricular assist device: A single institution study.外科植入式血管内微轴左心室辅助装置:一项单中心研究。
JTCVS Tech. 2023 Oct 20;23:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.10.012. eCollection 2024 Feb.