Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 May 15;49(10):726-732. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004675. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
A retrospective case-control study.
To differentiate neurodegenerative diseases from compressive cervical myelopathy (CCM) using motor-evoked potentials (MEPs).
When considering surgery for CCM, it may be necessary to differentiate the condition from a neurodegenerative disease.
A total of 30 healthy volunteers, 52 typical CCM patients with single-level compression of the spinal cord at C4-5 or C5-6, 7 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and 12 patients with demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, including 11 patients with multiple sclerosis and 1 patient with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, formed our study population. MEPs were recorded from the bilateral abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electrical stimulation of the ulnar and tibial nerves. Central motor conduction time, peripheral conduction time, amplitude of MEPs, and frequency of F waves were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the cutoff value for distinguishing between CCM and ALS.
Significant differences were observed in the amplitude of MEPs and frequency of F waves evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation between patients with CCM and ALS. The MEP amplitude of AH was more accurate in differentiating between the two diseases compared with ADM (cutoff value, 11.2 mV, sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 85.7%). All 7 patients with ALS showed reduced frequency of F waves from ADM or AH, but none of the healthy volunteers or patients with other diseases demonstrated this finding. Moreover, there were no significant differences between CCM and demyelinating disease of the central nervous system in any of the assessments.
The amplitude of MEPs and frequency of F waves evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation could be helpful in differentiating ALS from CCM.
回顾性病例对照研究。
使用运动诱发电位(MEP)区分神经退行性疾病与压迫性颈髓病(CCM)。
在考虑对 CCM 进行手术时,可能需要将其与神经退行性疾病区分开来。
共纳入 30 名健康志愿者、52 名单节段脊髓压迫在 C4-5 或 C5-6 的典型 CCM 患者、7 名肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者和 12 名中枢神经系统脱髓鞘疾病患者,包括 11 名多发性硬化症患者和 1 名视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍患者。使用经颅磁刺激和尺神经、胫神经电刺激记录双侧趾短展肌(ADM)和拇展肌(AH)的 MEP。评估中枢运动传导时间、周围传导时间、MEP 幅度和 F 波频率。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析确定区分 CCM 和 ALS 的截断值。
CCM 患者与 ALS 患者在外周神经刺激诱发的 MEP 幅度和 F 波频率方面存在显著差异。与 ADM 相比,AH 的 MEP 幅度在区分这两种疾病方面更为准确(截断值为 11.2mV,灵敏度为 87.5%,特异性为 85.7%)。所有 7 名 ALS 患者的 ADM 或 AH 均出现 F 波频率降低,但健康志愿者或其他疾病患者均无此发现。此外,在任何评估中,CCM 与中枢神经系统脱髓鞘疾病之间均无显著差异。
外周神经刺激诱发的 MEP 幅度和 F 波频率有助于区分 ALS 与 CCM。