Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Workers Compensation Hospital Bergmannstrost, Merseburger Str. 165, 06112, Halle/Saale, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1873-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02259-z. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
Dorsal pelvic ring fractures may result from high energy trauma in younger patients or from osteoporosis as fragility fractures in elderly patients. To date, no strong consensus exists on the best surgical technique to treat posterior pelvic ring injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical performance of a new implant for angle-stable fixation of the posterior pelvic ring and patient outcome.
In a prospective pilot study, 27 patients (age: 39-87 years) with posterior pelvic ring fractures classified according to the AO classification (n = 5) or to the fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) classification (n = 22) were treated using the new implant. During a follow-up period of 1 year, surgical parameters of the implantation technique, complication rate, morbidity, mortality, preservation of patient mobility, and social independence were evaluated.
No implant misplacement or failure was observed. Two patients developed symptomatic spinal canal stenosis at L4/L5 following mobilization. MRI diagnosis proved the implant was not responsible for the symptoms. In one case, an additional plate stabilization of a pubic ramus fracture was necessary 6 months later. There was no inpatient mortality. One patient died due to her underlying oncological disease within the first 3 months. The main outcome parameters were pain, mobility, preservation of independent living and employment.
Operative instrumentation of dorsal pelvic ring fractures should be stable enough to allow for immediate weight bearing. The new locking nail implant offers percutaneous reduction and fixation options and may decrease the generally observed rate of complications.
German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00023797, date of registration: 07.12.2020.
背骨盆环骨折可由年轻患者的高能创伤引起,也可由老年患者的骨质疏松脆性骨折引起。迄今为止,对于治疗后骨盆环损伤的最佳手术技术尚无明确共识。本研究旨在评估一种新型植入物在稳定固定后骨盆环方面的手术性能和患者预后。
在一项前瞻性试点研究中,使用新型植入物治疗了 27 例根据 AO 分类(n=5)或脆性骨盆骨折(FFP)分类(n=22)分类的后骨盆环骨折患者。在 1 年的随访期间,评估了植入技术的手术参数、并发症发生率、发病率、死亡率、患者活动能力和社会独立性的保留情况。
未观察到植入物错位或失效。2 例患者在活动后出现 L4/L5 症状性椎管狭窄。MRI 诊断证明植入物与症状无关。在 1 例病例中,6 个月后需要额外的耻骨支骨折板固定。无住院死亡。1 例患者因基础肿瘤疾病在 3 个月内死亡。主要结局参数为疼痛、活动能力、独立生活和就业能力的保留。
背骨盆环骨折的手术器械应足够稳定,以允许立即负重。新型锁定钉植入物提供了经皮复位和固定的选择,并可能降低通常观察到的并发症发生率。
德国临床试验注册中心 ID:DRKS00023797,注册日期:2020 年 12 月 7 日。