Li Jinpeng, Jia Yuntao, Shao Changdong, Li Yuanming, Song Jinlong
Intervention Ward 1, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Qixia Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Qixia, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2023 Apr 5;19:329-339. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S400079. eCollection 2023.
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and regorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 38 patients with unresectable HCC who were treated with PD-1 inhibitor in combination with regorafenib as a second⁃line therapy as well as the data of 32 patients treated with regorafenib only therapy as a control. The clinical data, previous treatment strategies, follow-up imaging results, and adverse events during follow-ups were recorded. The mRECIST Criteria were used to evaluate the treatment outcome of intrahepatic lesions, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival time.
Up to the last follow-up, the rego-PD-1 group had higher objective response rate (39.5% vs 15.6%, P = 0.028), longer progression-free survival (median 5.9 vs 4.6 months; P = 0.044), and better overall survival (OS) (median 14.5 vs 9.5 months; P = 0.041) than the regorafenib only group. Among the 38 patients in rego-PD-1 group, 1 patient (2.7%) achieved complete response, 14 patients (36.8%) achieved partial response, 14 patients (36.8%) achieved stable disease, and 9 patients (23.7%) achieved progressive disease. Among the 32 patients in regorafenib alone, 5 (15.6%) achieved partial response, 12 (37.5%) achieved stable disease, and 15 (46.9%) achieved progressive disease. Regorafenib alone, Child-Pugh B, and tumors >3 were independent prognostic factors for poor OS. The difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups was not statistically significant (36.8% vs 28.1%; P = 0.439). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events included hypertension and diarrhea.
PD-1 inhibitor combined with regorafenib is a promising regimen in treating patients with unresectable HCC owing to its safety and effectiveness as well as low incidence of serious adverse events with its use.
本研究旨在评估程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂与瑞戈非尼联合作为晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)二线治疗的安全性和疗效。
我们回顾性分析了38例接受PD-1抑制剂联合瑞戈非尼作为二线治疗的不可切除HCC患者的数据,以及32例仅接受瑞戈非尼治疗作为对照的患者的数据。记录临床资料、既往治疗策略、随访影像学结果以及随访期间的不良事件。采用改良RECIST标准评估肝内病灶的治疗效果,采用Kaplan-Meier法评估生存时间。
截至最后一次随访,瑞戈非尼联合PD-1组的客观缓解率更高(39.5%对15.6%,P = 0.028),无进展生存期更长(中位5.9个月对4.6个月;P = 0.044),总生存期(OS)更好(中位14.5个月对9.5个月;P = 0.041)。瑞戈非尼联合PD-1组的38例患者中,1例(2.7%)达到完全缓解,14例(36.8%)达到部分缓解,14例(36.8%)病情稳定,9例(23.7%)病情进展。在仅接受瑞戈非尼治疗的32例患者中,5例(15.6%)达到部分缓解,12例(37.5%)病情稳定,15例(46.9%)病情进展。仅使用瑞戈非尼、Child-Pugh B级以及肿瘤>3个是OS不良的独立预后因素。两组3/4级不良事件的发生率差异无统计学意义(36.8%对28.1%;P = 0.439)。≥3级治疗相关不良事件包括高血压和腹泻。
PD-1抑制剂联合瑞戈非尼因其安全性、有效性以及使用时严重不良事件发生率低,是治疗不可切除HCC患者的一种有前景的方案。