• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同免疫组织化学染色方法中程序性细胞死亡蛋白1配体1的一致性比较]

[Consistency comparison of programmed cell death 1-ligand 1 in different immuno-histochemical staining methods].

作者信息

Li D, DI J T, Xiong Y

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Apr 18;55(2):339-342. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.020.

DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.020
PMID:37042147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10091256/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the consistency of programmed cell death 1-ligand 1 (PD-L1, clone E1L3N, 22C3, SP263) in different immunohistochemical staining methods.

METHODS

The first step was to select the optimal process: The PD-L1(clone E1L3N) antibody recommended process, self-built process ①, self-built process ② and self-built process ③ were used to perform immunohistochemical staining in 5 cases of tonsil tissue. The quality of all slides was scored by expert pathologists (0-6 points). The process with the highest score was selected. The second step was to compare the consistency between the optimal procedure and the two standard procedures. Thirty-two cases of lung non-small cell carcinoma diagnosed by pathology in Peking University First Hospital in the past two years were randomly selected. The 32 cases were stained in parallel with the SP263 and 22C3 standard procedures, and all stained slides were scored by specialized pathologists for tumor proportion score (TPS). The scoring results were grouped according to < 1%, ≥1% to < 10%, ≥10% to < 50%, and ≥50%. The consistency of PD-L1 detection antibody clone E1L3N and 22C3, E1L3N and SP263 staining results was analyzed.

RESULTS

Tonsil stained slides scores (0-6 points) were as follows: The recommended protocol was 5, 5, 5, 5 and 5. The self-built process ① was 5, 6, 6, 5 and 6. The self-built process ② was 4, 4, 4, 4 and 4.The self-built process ③ was 3, 3, 3, 3 and 3. The self-built process ① was the best with the highest score. The TPSs of 32 non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cases were as follows: Of self-built process ①, 6 cases were lower than 1%, 5 cases were from 1% to 10%, 10 cases were from 10% to 50%, and 11 cases were higher than 50%; of 22C3 standard procedure, 5 cases were lower than 1%, 3 cases were from 1% to 10%, 13 cases were from 10% to 50%, 11 cases were higher than 50%; of SP263 standard procedure, 7 cases were lower than 1%, 4 cases were from 1% to 10%, 11 cases were from 10% to 50%, 10 cases were higher than 50%. The results of the consistency test were as follows: The value for self-built process ① and 22C3 standard procedure was 0.736 ( < 0.001), the agreement was good; the value for self-built process ① and SP263 standard procedure was 0.914 ( < 0.001), the agreement was very good.

CONCLUSION

The immunostaining using PD-L1(E1L3N) with validated self-built staining protocol ① by Ventana Benchmark GX platform can obtain high quality of slides, and the TPSs based on these slides are in good agreement with 22C3 and SP263 standard procedures.

摘要

目的

比较程序性死亡蛋白1配体1(PD-L1,克隆号E1L3N、22C3、SP263)在不同免疫组织化学染色方法中的一致性。

方法

第一步是选择最佳流程:采用PD-L1(克隆号E1L3N)抗体推荐流程、自建流程①、自建流程②和自建流程③对5例扁桃体组织进行免疫组织化学染色。由病理专家对所有切片质量进行评分(0 - 6分)。选择得分最高的流程。第二步是比较最佳流程与两种标准流程之间的一致性。随机选取北京大学第一医院过去两年经病理诊断的32例肺非小细胞癌病例。这32例病例分别采用SP263和22C3标准流程进行平行染色,所有染色切片由专业病理学家进行肿瘤比例评分(TPS)。评分结果按<1%、≥1%至<10%、≥10%至<50%、≥50%进行分组。分析PD-L1检测抗体克隆号E1L3N与22C3、E1L3N与SP263染色结果的一致性。

结果

扁桃体染色切片评分(0 - 6分)如下:推荐流程的评分为5、5、5、5和5分。自建流程①为5、6、6、5和6分。自建流程②为4、4、4、4和4分。自建流程③为3、3、3、3和3分。自建流程①得分最高,效果最佳。32例非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)病例的TPS如下:自建流程①中,6例低于1%,5例为1%至10%,10例为10%至50%,11例高于50%;22C3标准流程中,5例低于1%,3例为1%至10%,13例为10%至50%,11例高于50%;SP263标准流程中,7例低于1%,4例为1%至10%,11例为10%至50%,10例高于50%。一致性检验结果如下:自建流程①与22C3标准流程的κ值为0.736(P<0.001),一致性良好;自建流程①与SP263标准流程的κ值为0.914(P<0.001),一致性非常好。

结论

采用Ventana Benchmark GX平台经验证的自建染色流程①对PD-L1(E1L3N)进行免疫染色可获得高质量切片,基于这些切片的TPS与22C3和SP263标准流程具有良好的一致性。

相似文献

1
[Consistency comparison of programmed cell death 1-ligand 1 in different immuno-histochemical staining methods].[不同免疫组织化学染色方法中程序性细胞死亡蛋白1配体1的一致性比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Apr 18;55(2):339-342. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.02.020.
2
PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a laboratory-developed test using clone E1L3N in comparison with 22C3 and SP263 assays.PD-L1 表达在非小细胞肺癌中的应用:使用 E1L3N 克隆与 22C3 和 SP263 检测试剂盒比较评估实验室开发检测试剂盒的诊断准确性。
Hum Pathol. 2019 Aug;90:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
Quantitative and qualitative characterization of Two PD-L1 clones: SP263 and E1L3N.两种程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)克隆体:SP263和E1L3N的定量与定性表征
Diagn Pathol. 2016 May 18;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13000-016-0494-2.
4
A Prospective, Multi-institutional, Pathologist-Based Assessment of 4 Immunohistochemistry Assays for PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.一项非小细胞肺癌中 PD-L1 表达的前瞻性、多机构、基于病理学家的 4 种免疫组化检测评估。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;3(8):1051-1058. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0013.
5
Multicenter Comparison of 22C3 PharmDx (Agilent) and SP263 (Ventana) Assays to Test PD-L1 Expression for NSCLC Patients to Be Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.多中心比较 22C3 PharmDx(安捷伦)和 SP263(VENTANA)检测用于免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的 NSCLC 患者 PD-L1 表达的试剂盒。
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Nov;12(11):1654-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.07.031. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
6
PD-L1 Assays 22C3 and SP263 are Not Interchangeable in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer When Considering Clinically Relevant Cutoffs: An Interclone Evaluation by Differently Trained Pathologists.PD-L1 检测试剂 22C3 和 SP263 在考虑临床相关截断值时在非小细胞肺癌中不可互换:不同培训的病理学家进行的克隆间评估。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Oct;42(10):1384-1389. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001105.
7
Concordance of assessments of four PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).四种程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)免疫组化检测方法在食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)中的评估一致性
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 28;150(2):43. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05595-0.
8
Comparison of SP263 and 22C3 immunohistochemistry PD-L1 assays for clinical efficacy of adjuvant atezolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: results from the randomized phase III IMpower010 trial.SP263 和 22C3 免疫组化 PD-L1 检测在非小细胞肺癌辅助阿特珠单抗治疗中的临床疗效比较:来自随机 III 期 IMpower010 试验的结果。
J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Oct;11(10). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007047.
9
High concordance of programmed death-ligand 1 expression with immunohistochemistry detection between antibody clones 22C3 and E1L3N in non-small cell lung cancer biopsy samples.在非小细胞肺癌活检样本中,程序性死亡配体1表达与抗体克隆22C3和E1L3N的免疫组织化学检测结果高度一致。
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Oct;9(10):5819-5828. doi: 10.21037/tcr-20-101.
10
[Consistency of PD-L1 immunohistochemical detection platforms in biopsy samples with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study].[晚期肺腺癌活检样本中PD-L1免疫组化检测平台的一致性:一项多中心研究]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 8;47(11):840-844. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2018.11.005.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of E1L3N antibody for PD-L1 detection and prediction of pembrolizumab response in non-small-cell lung cancer.用于检测非小细胞肺癌中PD-L1及预测帕博利珠单抗反应的E1L3N抗体的验证
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Nov 1;2(1):137. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00206-4.
2
Comprehensive Comparison of 22C3 and SP263 PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Routine Clinical and Conditioned Archives.使用常规临床和预处理存档对非小细胞肺癌中22C3和SP263 PD-L1表达的综合比较
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 27;14(13):3138. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133138.
3
Clinical evaluation of a laboratory-developed test using clone E1L3N for the detection of PD-L1 expression status in non-small cell lung cancer.实验室开发的使用克隆 E1L3N 检测非小细胞肺癌 PD-L1 表达状态的检测方法的临床评估。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Mar;35(3):e23696. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23696. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
4
PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in non-small-cell lung cancer: unraveling differences in staining concordance and interpretation.PD-L1 免疫组化检测在非小细胞肺癌中的应用:解析染色一致性和解读差异。
Virchows Arch. 2021 May;478(5):827-839. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-02976-5. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
5
SITC cancer immunotherapy resource document: a compass in the land of biomarker discovery.SITC 癌症免疫治疗资源文件:生物标志物发现领域的指南针。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000705.
6
Mapping the binding sites of antibodies utilized in programmed cell death ligand-1 predictive immunohistochemical assays for use with immuno-oncology therapies.绘制用于免疫肿瘤治疗的程序性细胞死亡配体-1 预测性免疫组织化学检测中使用的抗体结合位点图谱。
Mod Pathol. 2020 Apr;33(4):518-530. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0372-z. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
7
Consistency of tumor and immune cell programmed cell death ligand-1 expression within and between tumor blocks using the VENTANA SP263 assay.使用VENTANA SP263检测法检测肿瘤块内及肿瘤块之间肿瘤和免疫细胞程序性细胞死亡配体-1表达的一致性。
Diagn Pathol. 2018 Jul 24;13(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13000-018-0725-9.
8
Use of the 22C3 anti-PD-L1 antibody to determine PD-L1 expression in multiple automated immunohistochemistry platforms.使用22C3抗程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抗体在多个自动化免疫组织化学平台上检测PD-L1表达。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0183023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183023. eCollection 2017.
9
Comparison of Different Antibody Clones for Immunohistochemistry Detection of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) on Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.非小细胞肺癌中程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)免疫组化检测不同抗体克隆的比较
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2018 Feb;26(2):83-93. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000531.
10
Quantitative Assessment of the Heterogeneity of PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌中 PD-L1 表达异质性的定量评估。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):46-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3638.