直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在肾功能谱中的比较:来自 COMBINE AF 的患者水平网络荟萃分析。

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Across the Spectrum of Kidney Function: Patient-Level Network Meta-Analyses From COMBINE AF.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC (J.H., M.R.P., R.D.L., S.D.P., C.B.G.).

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.H., K.H., M.R.P., R.D.L., S.D.P., H.H., C.B.G.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2023 Jun 6;147(23):1748-1757. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062752. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty surrounding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with kidney dysfunction.

METHODS

Using the COMBINE AF (A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in Atrial Fibrillation) database (data from RE-LY [Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy], ROCKET AF [Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation], ARISTOTLE [Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation], and ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 [Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48]), we performed an individual patient-level network meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DOACs versus warfarin across continuous creatinine clearance (CrCl). A multivariable Cox model including treatment-by-CrCl interaction with random effects was fitted to estimate hazard ratios for paired treatment strategies (standard-dose DOAC, lower-dose DOAC, and warfarin). Outcomes included stroke and systemic embolism (S/SE), major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and death.

RESULTS

Among 71 683 patients (mean age, 70.6±9.4 years; 37.3% female; median follow-up, 23.1 months), the mean CrCl was 75.5±30.5 mL/min. The incidence of S/SE, major bleeding, ICH, and death increased significantly with worsening kidney function. Across continuous CrCl values down to 25 mL/min, the hazard of major bleeding did not change for patients randomized to standard-dose DOACs compared with those randomized to warfarin (=0.61). Compared with warfarin, standard-dose DOAC use resulted in a significantly lower hazard of ICH at CrCl values <122 mL/min, with a trend for increased safety with DOAC as CrCl decreased (6.2% decrease in hazard ratio per 10-mL/min decrease in CrCl; =0.08). Compared with warfarin, standard-dose DOAC use resulted in a significantly lower hazard of S/SE with CrCl <87 mL/min, with a significant treatment-by-CrCl effect (4.8% decrease in hazard ratio per 10-mL/min decrease in CrCl; =0.01). The hazard of death was significantly lower with standard-dose DOACs for patients with CrCl <77 mL/min, with a trend toward increasing benefit with lower CrCl (2.1% decrease in hazard ratio per 10-mL/min decrease in CrCl; =0.08). Use of lower-dose rather than standard-dose DOACs was not associated with a significant difference in incident bleeding or ICH in patients with reduced kidney function but was associated with a higher incidence4 of death and S/SE.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard-dose DOACs are safer and more effective than warfarin down to a CrCl of at least 25 mL/min. Lower-dose DOACs do not significantly lower the incidence of bleeding or ICH compared with standard-dose DOACs but are associated with a higher incidence of S/SE and death. These findings support the use of standard-dose DOACs over warfarin in patients with kidney dysfunction.

摘要

背景

在肾功能不全的患者中,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的使用存在不确定性。

方法

利用 COMBINE AF(多个机构之间的合作,以更好地研究非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在心房颤动中的应用)数据库(来自 RE-LY [长期抗凝治疗的随机评估]、ROCKET AF [每日一次口服直接 Xa 因子抑制剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂预防心房颤动中的卒中和栓塞试验]、ARISTOTLE [阿哌沙班预防心房颤动中的卒中和其他血栓栓塞事件]和 ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 [在心房颤动-心肌梗死溶栓治疗中新一代 Xa 因子的有效抗凝 48])的数据,我们进行了个体患者水平的网络荟萃分析,以评估 DOACs 与华法林在连续肌酐清除率(CrCl)下的安全性和有效性。使用包含治疗与 CrCl 交互作用的多变量 Cox 模型和随机效应来估计配对治疗策略(标准剂量 DOAC、低剂量 DOAC 和华法林)的风险比。结局包括卒中和全身性栓塞(S/SE)、大出血、颅内出血(ICH)和死亡。

结果

在 71683 名患者(平均年龄 70.6±9.4 岁;37.3%为女性;中位随访 23.1 个月)中,CrCl 的平均值为 75.5±30.5mL/min。随着肾功能恶化,S/SE、大出血、ICH 和死亡的发生率显著增加。在连续 CrCl 值下降到 25 mL/min 时,与随机接受华法林相比,随机接受标准剂量 DOAC 的患者大出血的风险没有变化(=0.61)。与华法林相比,在 CrCl 值<122 mL/min 时,标准剂量 DOAC 的使用显著降低了 ICH 的风险,并且随着 DOAC 的降低,安全性呈趋势增加(CrCl 每降低 10 mL/min,风险比降低 6.2%;=0.08)。与华法林相比,在 CrCl<87 mL/min 时,标准剂量 DOAC 的使用显著降低了 S/SE 的风险,并且存在 CrCl 效应(CrCl 每降低 10 mL/min,风险比降低 4.8%;=0.01)。在 CrCl<77 mL/min 的患者中,标准剂量 DOAC 的使用与死亡风险的降低显著相关,并且随着 CrCl 的降低,获益呈趋势增加(CrCl 每降低 10 mL/min,风险比降低 2.1%;=0.08)。在肾功能降低的患者中,使用低剂量 DOAC 而不是标准剂量 DOAC 与出血或 ICH 的发生率无显著差异,但与更高的 S/SE 和死亡率相关。

结论

标准剂量 DOACs 比华法林更安全、更有效,至少在 CrCl 为 25 mL/min 时如此。低剂量 DOACs 与标准剂量 DOACs 相比,出血或 ICH 的发生率没有显著降低,但与更高的 S/SE 和死亡率相关。这些发现支持在肾功能不全的患者中使用标准剂量 DOACs 而不是华法林。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索