Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Oct 1;481(10):1907-1916. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002649. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
Advanced practice professionals, including physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs), play an important role in providing high-quality orthopaedic care. This role has been highlighted by projections of nationwide shortages in orthopaedic surgeons, with rural areas expected to be most affected. Given that approximately half of rural counties have no practicing orthopaedic surgeons and that advanced practice professionals have been shown to be more likely to practice in rural areas compared to physicians in other medical disciplines, orthopaedic advanced practice professionals may be poised to address orthopaedic care shortages in rural areas, but the degree to which this is true has not been well characterized.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What percentage of rural counties have no orthopaedic caregivers, including surgeons and advanced practice professionals? (2) Is the density of advanced practice professionals greater than that of orthopaedic surgeons in rural counties? (3) Do orthopaedic advanced practice professionals only practice in counties that also have practicing orthopaedic surgeons? (4) Are NPs in states with full practice authority more likely to practice in rural counties compared with NPs in restricted practice authority states?
We identified orthopaedic surgeons and advanced practice professionals using the 2019 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data, as this large dataset has been shown to be the most complete source of claims data nationwide. Each professional's ZIP Code was matched to counties per the US Postal Service ZIP Code Crosswalk Files. The total number and density of physician and advanced practice professionals per 100,000 residents were calculated per county nationwide. Counties were categorized as urban (large central metropolitan, large fringe metropolitan, medium metropolitan, and small metropolitan) or rural (micropolitan and noncore) using the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. Comparisons between rural and urban county caregivers were conducted with the chi-square test and odds ratios. Population densities were compared with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A bivariate density map was made to visualize the nationwide distribution of orthopaedic caregivers and determine the percentage of rural counties with no orthopaedic caregivers as well as whether orthopaedic advanced practice professionals practiced in counties not containing any surgeons. Additionally, to compare states with NP's full versus restricted practice authority, each NP was grouped based on their state to determine whether NPs in states with full practice authority were more likely to practice in rural counties. We identified a group of 31,091 orthopaedic caregivers, which was comprised of 23,728 physicians, 964 NPs, and 6399 PAs (7363 advanced practice professionals). A total of 88% (20,879 of 23,728) of physicians and 87% (6427 of 7363) of advanced practice professionals were in urban counties, which is comparable to nationwide population distributions.
A total of 39% (1237 of 3139) of counties had no orthopaedic professionals (defined as orthopaedic surgeons or advanced practice professionals) in 2019. Among these counties, 82% (1015 of 1237) were rural and 18% (222 of 1237) were urban. The density of advanced practice professionals providing orthopaedic services compared with the density of orthopaedic surgeons was higher in rural counties (18 ± 70 versus 8 ± 40 per 100,000 residents; p = 0.001). Additionally, 3% (57 of 1974) of rural and 1% (13 of 1165) of urban counties had at least one orthopaedic advanced practice professional, but no orthopaedic surgeons concurrently practicing in the county. There was no difference between the percentage of rural counties with an NP in states with full versus restricted practice authority for NPs (19% [157 of 823] versus 26% [36 of 141], OR 1.45 [95% CI 0.99 to 2.2]; p = 0.08).
As advanced practice professionals tended to only practice in counties which contain orthopaedic surgeons, our analysis suggests that plans to increase the number of advanced practice professionals alone in rural counties may not be sufficient to fully address the demand for orthopaedic care in rural areas that currently do not have orthopaedic surgeons in practice. Rather, interventions are needed to encourage more orthopaedic surgeons to practice in rural counties in collaborative partnerships with advanced practice professionals. In turn, rural orthopaedic advanced practice professionals may serve to further extend the accessibility of these surgeons, but it remains to be determined what the total number and ratio of advanced practice professionals and surgeons is needed to serve rural counties adequately.
To increase rural orthopaedic outreach, state legislatures may consider providing financial incentives to hospitals who adopt traveling clinic models, incorporating advanced practice professionals in these models as physician-extenders to further increase the coverage of orthopaedic care. Furthermore, the creation of more widespread financial incentives and programs aimed at expanding the experience of trainees in serving rural populations are longer-term investments to foster interest and retention of orthopaedic caregivers in rural settings.
包括医师助理 (PA) 和执业护士 (NP) 在内的高级实践专业人员在提供高质量的骨科护理方面发挥着重要作用。这一角色在全国范围内骨科外科医生短缺的情况下得到了凸显,预计农村地区受影响最大。鉴于大约一半的农村县没有执业骨科外科医生,而与其他医学专业的医生相比,高级实践专业人员更有可能在农村地区执业,因此骨科高级实践专业人员可能有能力解决农村地区的骨科护理短缺问题,但这在多大程度上是真实的还没有得到很好的描述。
问题/目的:(1) 有多少农村县没有骨科护理人员,包括外科医生和高级实践专业人员?(2) 农村县的高级实践专业人员密度是否大于骨科外科医生?(3) 骨科高级实践专业人员是否只在有执业骨科外科医生的县执业?(4) 与在限制执业权州的 NPs 相比,在具有完全执业权州的 NPs 是否更有可能在农村县执业?
我们使用 2019 年 Medicare 提供者使用和支付数据来确定骨科外科医生和高级实践专业人员,因为该大型数据集已被证明是全国范围内索赔数据最完整的来源。每位专业人员的邮政编码与美国邮政服务邮政编码交叉文件中的县相对应。按县计算每 10 万居民的医生和高级实践专业人员总数和密度。使用国家卫生统计中心城市-农村分类方案,根据大都市、大边缘大都市、中大都市和小大都市以及大都市和非核心大都市的人口密度将县分为城市或农村。使用卡方检验和优势比比较农村和城市县护理人员之间的差异。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较人口密度。制作了一个双变量密度图,以可视化全国范围内骨科护理人员的分布情况,并确定没有骨科护理人员的农村县的百分比,以及骨科高级实践专业人员是否在没有外科医生的县执业。此外,为了比较具有 NP 完全执业权和限制执业权的州,根据其所在州将每位 NP 分组,以确定具有完全执业权的州的 NP 是否更有可能在农村县执业。我们确定了 31091 名骨科护理人员,其中包括 23728 名医生、964 名 NPs 和 6399 名 PA(7363 名高级实践专业人员)。23728 名医生中有 88%(20879 名)和 7363 名高级实践专业人员中有 87%(6427 名)在城市县,这与全国人口分布相当。
2019 年,39%(1237/3139)的县没有骨科专业人员(定义为骨科外科医生或高级实践专业人员)。在这些县中,82%(1015/1237)是农村县,18%(222/1237)是城市县。与骨科外科医生相比,提供骨科服务的高级实践专业人员的密度在农村县更高(每 10 万居民 18 ± 70 与 8 ± 40;p = 0.001)。此外,3%(57/1974)的农村县和 1%(13/1165)的城市县至少有一名骨科高级实践专业人员,但同时没有骨科外科医生在该县执业。在具有 NP 完全执业权和限制执业权的州,NP 所在的农村县比例没有差异(19%[157/823]与 26%[36/141],OR 1.45[95%CI 0.99 至 2.2];p = 0.08)。
由于高级实践专业人员往往只在有骨科外科医生的县执业,我们的分析表明,仅增加农村县高级实践专业人员的数量可能不足以完全解决目前没有骨科外科医生执业的农村地区对骨科护理的需求。相反,需要采取干预措施,鼓励更多的骨科外科医生与高级实践专业人员合作,在农村县执业。反过来,农村骨科高级实践专业人员可能会进一步扩大这些外科医生的可及性,但仍有待确定需要多少高级实践专业人员和外科医生的总数和比例才能充分满足农村县的需求。
为了增加农村地区的骨科服务范围,州立法机构可以考虑为采用巡回诊所模式的医院提供财政激励,将高级实践专业人员纳入这些模式,作为医生的延伸,以进一步扩大骨科护理的覆盖范围。此外,创造更广泛的财政激励和旨在扩大受训人员服务农村人口经验的计划是对长期投资,以培养对农村环境的骨科护理人员的兴趣和保留。