Suppr超能文献

关于睡眠的功能失调信念与态度量表:欧洲葡萄牙语版DBAS - 30的维度及新简短版本(DBAS - SF - 16)的编制

The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep scale: Dimensions of the European Portuguese DBAS-30 and development of a new short version (DBAS-SF-16).

作者信息

Clemente Vanda, Marques Daniel Ruivo, Miller-Mendes Mariana, Morin Charles M, Serra Joana, Allen Gomes Ana

机构信息

Sleep Medicine Centre, Hospital and University Centre of Coimbra (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal; University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Coimbra, Portugal; Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CINEICC), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; University of Aveiro, Department of Education and Psychology, Aveiro, Portugal.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2023 Jun;106:59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.03.021. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS) is the most widely validated instrument for assessing sleep-related cognitions. This study aimed to examine the reliability of the DBAS-30 European Portuguese version, explore its dimensionality, and develop a new short version suitable for differentiating the presence/absence of insomnia.

METHODS

From 824 participants aged 18-85 years, the Insomnia Group (IG, n = 355, 261 females and 94 males) and Normal Sleepers Group (NSG, n = 292, 237 females, 54 males and 1 with no response) were constituted. Thirty-one patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome were also recruited. For the DBAS 16-items version, the ability to differentiate dysfunctional beliefs between people with and without insomnia was used as the main criterion for item retention.

RESULTS

DBAS-30 PT demonstrated good internal consistency and significantly discriminated IG from NSG. Based on a robust EFA (RDWLS), a three-dimensional structure was determined for IG (Ageing and Hopelessness, Sleep Expectations, and Consequences and Helplessness). DBAS-SF-16 presented as an internally-consistent measure with a reliable two-factor structure (Consequences and Helplessness, Medication and Hopelessness) and showed construct and known groups validity. ROC analysis demonstrated DBAS-SF-16's relevant clinical accuracy, and 4.3 provides the best cut-off score in detecting the level of dysfunctional beliefs associated with clinical insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

A new and meaningful dimensionality of the DBAS-30 was found. DBAS-SF-16 showed to be a reliable, valid, and robust tool for evaluating dysfunctional beliefs about insomnia in clinical and non-clinical populations.

摘要

目的

睡眠功能障碍信念与态度量表(DBAS)是评估与睡眠相关认知最广泛验证的工具。本研究旨在检验DBAS - 30欧洲葡萄牙语版本的信度,探索其维度,并开发一个适用于区分失眠存在与否的新简短版本。

方法

从824名年龄在18 - 85岁的参与者中,组成了失眠组(IG,n = 355,女性261名,男性94名)和正常睡眠者组(NSG,n = 292,女性237名,男性54名,1名无回应者)。还招募了31名阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者。对于DBAS 16项版本,区分有无失眠者功能障碍信念的能力被用作项目保留的主要标准。

结果

DBAS - 30 PT表现出良好的内部一致性,并显著区分了IG组和NSG组。基于稳健的探索性因素分析(RDWLS),确定了IG组的三维结构(衰老与绝望、睡眠期望以及后果与无助)。DBAS - SF - 16呈现为一种内部一致的测量方法,具有可靠的双因素结构(后果与无助、药物治疗与绝望),并显示出结构效度和已知群体效度。ROC分析证明了DBAS - SF - 16的相关临床准确性,4.3是检测与临床失眠相关功能障碍信念水平的最佳临界值。

结论

发现了DBAS - 30新的且有意义的维度。DBAS - SF - 16被证明是一种可靠、有效且稳健的工具,用于评估临床和非临床人群中关于失眠的功能障碍信念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验