• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比剂对基于人工智能的 CT 低衰减体积百分比测量的影响。

Influence of contrast agent on artificial intelligence-based CT low attenuation volume percentage measurement.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, AKH Celle, Celle, Germany.

Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2023 Jun;64(6):2111-2117. doi: 10.1177/02841851231165486. Epub 2023 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1177/02841851231165486
PMID:37046385
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low attenuation volume percentage (LAV%) has been identified as a quantitative imaging biomarker for emphysema with good correlation with spirometry. The influence of intravenous contrast agent on LAV% and its correlation with spirometry is not well known.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of intravenous contrast agent on artificial intelligence (AI)-based LAV% in correlation with spirometric Tiffeneau-Pinelli Index (TI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, two groups of 47 patients (mean age 68.04 ± 12.64 and 67.89 ± 11.54 years) with either non-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) or contrast-enhanced CT were compared. Using an AI-based software, LAV% was quantified using a threshold <-950 HU. TI was calculated from spirometry and pathologic airway obstruction was considered with a TI <70. The effect of contrast agent on LAV% and the relationship between TI and LAV% was analyzed. Correlation coefficients between TI and LAV% were compared for both groups.

RESULTS

Patients with non-enhanced CT had a mean LAV% of 9.07 ± 7.53. Of them, 22 patients had a TI <70% and 25 patients a TI ≥70%. Patients with contrast-enhanced CT had a mean LAV% of 6.54 ± 4.62. Of them, 20 patients had a TI <70% and 27 patients had a TI ≥70%. Contrast agent did not show a major effect on LAV% ( = 0.099) and the relationship between TI and LAV% ( = 0.88). In both groups, a significant correlation between TI and LAV% was found (ρ = -0.317 for non-enhanced CT; ρ = -0.514 for contrast-enhanced CT). Difference between correlation coefficients was insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that contrast agent does not influence LAV% nor its correlation with TI.

摘要

背景

低衰减容积百分比(LAV%)已被确定为一种与肺量计具有良好相关性的定量成像生物标志物。静脉内造影剂对 LAV%的影响及其与肺量计的相关性尚不清楚。

目的

评估静脉内造影剂对基于人工智能(AI)的 LAV%的影响,并与肺量计 Tiffeneau-Pinelli 指数(TI)相关联。

材料与方法

在一项回顾性研究中,比较了两组 47 例患者(平均年龄 68.04 ± 12.64 岁和 67.89 ± 11.54 岁),分别为非增强胸部 CT(CT)或增强 CT。使用基于 AI 的软件,使用阈值 <-950 HU 对 LAV%进行量化。从肺量计计算 TI,并且考虑到气道阻塞病理,TI <70 被认为存在气道阻塞。分析造影剂对 LAV%的影响,以及 TI 和 LAV%之间的关系。比较两组 TI 和 LAV%之间的相关系数。

结果

非增强 CT 的患者 LAV%平均值为 9.07 ± 7.53。其中,22 例患者 TI <70%,25 例患者 TI ≥70%。增强 CT 的患者 LAV%平均值为 6.54 ± 4.62。其中,20 例患者 TI <70%,27 例患者 TI ≥70%。造影剂对 LAV%没有明显影响(=0.099),并且对 TI 和 LAV%之间的关系也没有明显影响(=0.88)。在两组中,均发现 TI 和 LAV%之间存在显著相关性(非增强 CT 为 ρ=-0.317;增强 CT 为 ρ=-0.514)。相关系数之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,造影剂不会影响 LAV%及其与 TI 的相关性。

相似文献

1
Influence of contrast agent on artificial intelligence-based CT low attenuation volume percentage measurement.对比剂对基于人工智能的 CT 低衰减体积百分比测量的影响。
Acta Radiol. 2023 Jun;64(6):2111-2117. doi: 10.1177/02841851231165486. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
2
Artificial Intelligence-Based Emphysema Quantification in Routine Chest Computed Tomography: Correlation With Spirometry and Visual Emphysema Grading.基于人工智能的常规胸部计算机断层扫描肺气肿定量:与肺量计和视觉肺气肿分级的相关性。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2024;48(3):388-393. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001572. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
3
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence-Based Fully Automatic Chest CT Emphysema Quantification to Pulmonary Function Testing.基于人工智能的全自动 CT 肺气肿定量与肺功能测试的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1065-1071. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21572. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
4
Is Type and Grade of Emphysema Important for Bone Mineral Density and Aortic Calcifications?肺气肿的类型和分级对骨密度及主动脉钙化是否重要?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 5;13(13):3947. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133947.
5
Artificial Intelligence-based Fully Automated Per Lobe Segmentation and Emphysema-quantification Based on Chest Computed Tomography Compared With Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Severity of Smokers.基于人工智能的全叶段自动化分割和基于胸部 CT 的肺气肿定量与全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议吸烟人群严重程度的比较。
J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May;35 Suppl 1:S28-S34. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000500.
6
Effect of threshold on the correlation between airflow obstruction and low attenuation volume in smokers assessed by inspiratory and expiratory MDCT.阈值对吸烟者吸气和呼气MDCT评估的气流阻塞与低衰减体积之间相关性的影响。
Acta Radiol. 2015 Apr;56(4):438-46. doi: 10.1177/0284185114528489. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
7
Quantitative CT Evidence of Airway Inflammation in WTC Workers and Volunteers with Low FVC Spirometric Pattern.CT 定量评估低 FVC 肺活量表型的世贸中心工作人员和志愿者气道炎症的证据。
Lung. 2020 Jun;198(3):555-563. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00350-5. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Emphysema quantification on low-dose CT using percentage of low-attenuation volume and size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions: effects of adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing.使用低衰减体积百分比和低衰减肺区域大小分布在低剂量CT上进行肺气肿定量分析:采用三维处理的自适应迭代剂量降低的效果
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2268-2276. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.011.
9
Quantitative Emphysema Measurement On Ultra-High-Resolution CT Scans.超高分辨率 CT 扫描的定量肺气肿测量。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Oct 8;14:2283-2290. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S223605. eCollection 2019.
10
Predictive Modelling of Lung Function using Emphysematous Density Distribution.使用肺气肿密度分布预测肺功能。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 24;9(1):19763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56351-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative assessment of lung opacities from CT of pulmonary artery imaging data in COVID-19 patients: artificial intelligence versus radiologist.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者肺动脉成像数据CT中肺部混浊的定量评估:人工智能与放射科医生的比较
BJR Open. 2025 Apr 29;7(1):tzaf008. doi: 10.1093/bjro/tzaf008. eCollection 2025 Jan.