Suppr超能文献

使用五法式桡动脉远端血管入路的颈动脉支架置入术。

Carotid Artery Stenting Using Five-French Distal Radial Vascular Access.

作者信息

Di Gioia Giuseppe, Salemme Luigi, Ferrone Marco, Cioppa Angelo, Popusoi Grigore, Pucciarelli Armando, Verdoliva Sebastiano, Franzese Michele, Marga Simion, Barbato Emanuele, Tesorio Tullio

机构信息

Catheterization Laboratory, Montevergine Clinic, 83013 Mercogliano, Italy.

Department of Radiology, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, MD-2000 Chișinău, Moldova.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;13(7):1266. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071266.

Abstract

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is usually performed through a femoral vascular access using 6-9 Fr guiding catheters. We investigated whether a systematic distal radial approach using 5 Fr guiding sheaths was a safe and effective alternative to transfemoral approach for CAS. From July 2020 to October 2022, two operators at our center systematically performed CAS using a 5 Fr distal radial approach in consecutive patients. The main endpoints of the study were procedural success via distal radial and via proximal or distal radial access. The learning curve was evaluated by comparing the first half of patients versus the second half of patients enrolled. Procedural data and 30-day clinical outcomes were collected. Fifty-one patients were prospectively enrolled. CAS was effectively performed via distal radial access in 45 patients (88%). Overall radial artery success was 92%. Distal radial CAS was successfully performed in 20 out of the first 25 patients enrolled (80%), and in 25 of the last 26 patients enrolled (96%; = 0.07). Significantly less contrast was administered in the last 26 patients compared to the first 25 enrolled (110 (70, 140) mL vs. 120 (107, 150) mL; = 0.045). Radial artery occlusion was reported in 1 patient (2%). Only 1 minor stroke (2%) was reported in-hospital and at 30-day follow-up. In conclusion, distal radial CAS using 5 Fr catheters was a safe procedure with a high success rate. The procedure had a relatively short learning curve in operators familiar with transfemoral CAS.

摘要

颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)通常通过股血管入路使用6-9F引导导管进行。我们研究了使用5F引导鞘的系统性桡动脉远端入路是否是CAS经股动脉入路的一种安全有效的替代方法。从2020年7月至2022年10月,我们中心的两名操作者对连续患者系统性地采用5F桡动脉远端入路进行CAS。该研究的主要终点是通过桡动脉远端以及通过近端或远端桡动脉入路的手术成功率。通过比较纳入患者的前半部分与后半部分来评估学习曲线。收集手术数据和30天临床结果。前瞻性纳入了51例患者。45例患者(88%)通过桡动脉远端入路成功进行了CAS。总体桡动脉成功率为92%。在前25例纳入患者中有20例(80%)成功进行了桡动脉远端CAS,在最后26例纳入患者中有25例(96%;P = 0.07)。与前25例纳入患者相比,最后26例患者使用的造影剂明显更少(110(70,140)mL对120(107,150)mL;P = 0.045)。报告1例患者(2%)出现桡动脉闭塞。在住院期间和30天随访时仅报告1例轻度卒中(2%)。总之,使用5F导管的桡动脉远端CAS是一种成功率高的安全手术。对于熟悉经股动脉CAS的操作者来说,该手术的学习曲线相对较短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/059c/10093593/264bdf7c1726/diagnostics-13-01266-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验