Karbowiak Marcelina, Szymański Piotr, Zielińska Dorota
Department of Food Gastronomy and Food Hygiene, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159C St., (Building No. 32), 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Meat and Fat Technology, Waclaw Dabrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology-State Research Institute, Rakowiecka 36 St., 02-532 Warsaw, Poland.
Foods. 2023 Mar 28;12(7):1430. doi: 10.3390/foods12071430.
The control of spoilage microorganisms and foodborne pathogens in meat and meat products is a challenge for food producers, which potentially can be overcome through the combined use of biopreservatives, in the form of a mix of various microbial hurdles. The objective of this work is to systematically review the available knowledge to reveal whether various microbial hurdles applied in combination can pose an effective decontamination strategy for meat and meat products. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were utilized to identify and evaluate studies through February 2023. Search results yielded 45 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The most common meat biopreservatives were combinations of various starter cultures (24 studies), and the use of mixtures of non-starter protective cultures (13 studies). In addition, studies evaluating antimicrobial combinations of bacteriocins with other bacteriocins, BLIS (bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance), non-starter protective cultures, reuterin, and S-layer protein were included in the review (7 studies). In one study, a biopreservative mixture comprised antifungal protein PgAFP and protective cultures. The literature search revealed a positive effect, in most of the included studies, of the combination of various bacterial antimicrobials in inhibiting the growth of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria in meat products. The main advantages of the synergistic effect achieved were: (1) the induction of a stronger antimicrobial effect, (2) the extension of the spectrum of antibacterial action, and (3) the prevention of the regrowth of undesirable microorganisms. Although further research is required in this area, the combination of various microbial hurdles can pose a green and valuable biopreservation approach for maintaining the safety and quality of meat products.
控制肉类和肉制品中的腐败微生物及食源性病原体对食品生产商来说是一项挑战,而通过联合使用生物防腐剂(以各种微生物障碍的组合形式)有可能克服这一挑战。这项工作的目的是系统地回顾现有知识,以揭示联合应用各种微生物障碍是否能为肉类和肉制品提供一种有效的去污策略。利用PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库来识别和评估截至2023年2月的研究。搜索结果产生了45篇符合纳入标准的文章。最常见的肉类生物防腐剂是各种发酵剂培养物的组合(24项研究),以及使用非发酵剂保护性培养物的混合物(13项研究)。此外,评估细菌素与其他细菌素、类细菌素抑制物质(BLIS)、非发酵剂保护性培养物、罗伊氏菌素和S层蛋白的抗菌组合的研究也被纳入综述(7项研究)。在一项研究中,一种生物防腐剂混合物包含抗真菌蛋白PgAFP和保护性培养物。文献检索显示,在大多数纳入研究中,各种细菌抗菌剂的组合对抑制肉制品中致病和腐败细菌的生长具有积极作用。协同效应的主要优点包括:(1)诱导更强的抗菌作用;(2)扩展抗菌作用谱;(3)防止不良微生物的再生长。尽管该领域还需要进一步研究,但各种微生物障碍的组合可为维持肉制品的安全性和质量提供一种绿色且有价值的生物保存方法。