Wang I-Ting, Wang Chieh-Jen, Chen Chao-Hsien, Yang Sheng-Hsiung, Chen Chun-Yen, Huang Yen-Chun, Lin Chang-Yi, Wu Chien-Liang
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104217, Taiwan.
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 31;12(7):2628. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072628.
Targeted temperature management (TTM) is often considered to improve post-cardiac arrest patients' outcomes. However, the optimal timing to initiate cooling remained uncertain. This retrospective analysis enrolled all non-traumatic post-cardiac arrest adult patients with either out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) or in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) who received TTM from July 2015 to July 2021 at our hospital. The values of time delay before TTM and time to target temperature were divided into three periods according to optimal cut-off values identified using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. A total of 177 patients were enrolled. A shorter time delay before TTM (pre-induction time) was associated with a lower survival chance at 28 days (32.00% vs. 54.00%, = 0.0279). Patients with a longer cooling induction time (>440 minis) had better neurological outcomes (1.58% vs. 1.05%; = 0.001) and survival at 28 days (58.06% vs. 29.25%; = 0.006). After COX regression analysis, the influence of pre-induction time on survival became insignificant, but patients who cooled slowest still had a better chance of survival at 28 days. In conclusion, a shorter delay before TTM was not associated with better clinical outcomes. However, patients who took longer to reach the target temperature had better hospital survival and neurological outcomes than those who were cooled more rapidly. A further prospective study was warranted to evaluate the appropriate time window of TTM.
目标温度管理(TTM)通常被认为可改善心脏骤停后患者的预后。然而,启动降温的最佳时机仍不确定。这项回顾性分析纳入了2015年7月至2021年7月在我院接受TTM的所有非创伤性心脏骤停成年患者,包括院外心脏骤停(OHCA)或院内心脏骤停(IHCA)患者。根据使用受试者工作特征曲线分析确定的最佳临界值,将TTM前的时间延迟值和达到目标温度的时间分为三个时期。共纳入177例患者。TTM前较短的时间延迟(诱导前时间)与28天时较低的生存机会相关(32.00%对54.00%,P = 0.0279)。诱导降温时间较长(>440分钟)的患者具有更好的神经学预后(1.58%对1.05%;P = 0.001)和28天时的生存率(58.06%对29.25%;P = 0.006)。经过COX回归分析,诱导前时间对生存的影响变得不显著,但降温最慢的患者在28天时仍有更好的生存机会。总之,TTM前较短的延迟与更好的临床预后无关。然而,达到目标温度所需时间较长的患者比降温更快的患者具有更好的医院生存率和神经学预后。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究以评估TTM的合适时间窗。