Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology, School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Guangdong Province Graduate Joint Training Base (Foshan), Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;23(7):3490. doi: 10.3390/s23073490.
A multi-sensor medical-image fusion technique, which integrates useful information from different single-modal images of the same tissue and provides a fused image that is more comprehensive and objective than a single-source image, is becoming an increasingly important technique in clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. The salient information in medical images often visually describes the tissue. To effectively embed salient information in the fused image, a multi-sensor medical image fusion method is proposed based on an embedding bilateral filter in least squares and salient detection via a deformed smoothness constraint. First, source images are decomposed into base and detail layers using a bilateral filter in least squares. Then, the detail layers are treated as superpositions of salient regions and background information; a fusion rule for this layer based on the deformed smoothness constraint and guided filtering was designed to successfully conserve the salient structure and detail information of the source images. A base-layer fusion rule based on modified Laplace energy and local energy is proposed to preserve the energy information of these source images. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperformed nine state-of-the-art methods in both subjective and objective quality assessments on the Harvard Medical School dataset.
一种多传感器医学图像融合技术,它整合了同一组织的不同单模态图像中的有用信息,并提供了比单源图像更全面、更客观的融合图像,在临床诊断和治疗计划中变得越来越重要。医学图像中的显著信息通常直观地描述了组织。为了有效地在融合图像中嵌入显著信息,提出了一种基于嵌入双边滤波器的最小二乘和基于变形平滑约束的显著检测的多传感器医学图像融合方法。首先,使用双边滤波器的最小二乘法将源图像分解为基础层和细节层。然后,将细节层视为显著区域和背景信息的叠加;设计了一种基于变形平滑约束和引导滤波的该层融合规则,以成功保留源图像的显著结构和细节信息。提出了一种基于改进的拉普拉斯能量和局部能量的基础层融合规则,以保留这些源图像的能量信息。实验结果表明,在哈佛医学院数据集上,该方法在主观和客观质量评估方面均优于九种最先进的方法。