Hung Kuo-Chuan, Chuang Min-Hsiang, Chen Jen-Yin, Hsu Chih-Wei, Chiu Chong-Chi, Chang Ying-Jen, Lee Chia-Wei, Chen I-Wen, Sun Cheuk-Kwan
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.
Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 24;10:1094757. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1094757. eCollection 2023.
This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the pooled evidence regarding the effects of intravenous vitamin C (IVVC) on mortality rate in critically ill patients.
Databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October, 2022 to identify RCTs. The primary outcome was the risk of overall mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed based on IVVC dosage (i.e., cut-off value: 100 mg/kg/day or 10000 mg/day). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to examine the robustness of evidence.
A total of 12 trials including 1,712 patients were analyzed. Although meta-analysis demonstrated a lower risk of mortality in patients with IVVC treatment compared to those without [risk ratio (RR): 0.76, 95% CI: 0.6 to 0.97, = 0.02, = 36%, 1,711 patients), TSA suggested the need for more studies for verification. Moreover, subgroup analyses revealed a reduced mortality risk associated with a low IVVC dosage (RR = 0.72, = 0.03, 546 patients), while no beneficial effect was noted with high IVVC dosage (RR = 0.74, = 0.13, = 60%, 1,165 patients). The durations of vasopressor [mean difference (MD): -37.75 h, 404 patients) and mechanical ventilation (MD: -47.29 h, 388 patients) use were shorter in the IVVC group than those in the controls, while there was no significant difference in other prognostic outcomes (e.g., length of stay in intensive care unit/hospital) between the two groups.
Although intravenous vitamin C as a monotherapy reduced pooled mortality, durations of vasopressor use and mechanical ventilation, further research is required to support our findings and to identify the optimal dosage of vitamin C in the critical care setting.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022371090.
本荟萃分析旨在研究静脉注射维生素C(IVVC)对危重症患者死亡率影响的综合证据。
检索了包括Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆在内的数据库,检索时间从建库至2022年10月,以识别随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局是全因死亡风险。基于IVVC剂量(即临界值:100mg/kg/天或10000mg/天)进行亚组分析。采用试验序贯分析(TSA)来检验证据的稳健性。
共分析了12项试验,包括1712例患者。尽管荟萃分析表明接受IVVC治疗的患者死亡率风险低于未接受治疗的患者[风险比(RR):0.76,95%置信区间:0.6至0.97,P = 0.02,I² = 36%,1711例患者],但TSA提示需要更多研究进行验证。此外,亚组分析显示低剂量IVVC与降低的死亡风险相关(RR = 0.72,P = 0.03,546例患者),而高剂量IVVC未观察到有益效果(RR = 0.74,P = 0.13,I² = 60%,1165例患者)。IVVC组血管活性药物使用时间[平均差(MD):-37.75小时,404例患者]和机械通气时间(MD:-47.29小时,388例患者)短于对照组,而两组间其他预后结局(如重症监护病房/医院住院时间)无显著差异。
尽管静脉注射维生素C单药治疗可降低总体死亡率、血管活性药物使用时间和机械通气时间,但仍需要进一步研究来支持我们的发现,并确定危重症患者中维生素C的最佳剂量。