Suppr超能文献

漏气试验在检测直肠切除术后吻合口漏中的有效性:一项回顾性病例对照研究。

Efficacy of air leak test in detection of anastomotic leaks after rectal excision: a retrospective case-controlled study.

作者信息

Song Seung Ho, Park Jun Seok, Choi Gyu-Seog, Park Soo Yeon, Kim Hye Jin, Lee Sung-Min, Na Dong-Hee, Jeong Min Hye

机构信息

Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.

Kyungpook National University Bio-Medical Research Institute, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Apr;104(4):214-221. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.104.4.214. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although its efficacy is uncertain, an intraoperative air leak test (ALT) is commonly used to detect mechanical defects following bowel anastomosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ALT to detect anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal excision.

METHODS

We reviewed our database for patients with rectal cancers who had undergone curative surgery between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were grouped according to whether or not an ALT was performed. Propensity score analyses were performed to compare outcomes for groups in a 1:1 case-matched cohort.

RESULTS

In total, 1,191 patients underwent rectal excision; 438 (219 in each group) formed the case-matched cohort for analysis. The protective stoma rate was 16.0% and 14.6% in the ALT and the no-ALT groups, respectively (P = 0.791). In the ALT group, 2 patients (0.9%) showed a positive result and were treated with rectal tube drainage, resulting in no leakage. There was no significant difference in postoperative AL rate between the groups (ALT group: 4.6% no-ALT group: 4.1%, P > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

ALT played a minimal role in detecting AL following rectal excision. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and clarify whether AL can be prevented with ALT or alternative methods.

摘要

目的

尽管术中漏气试验(ALT)的疗效尚不确定,但它常用于检测肠吻合术后的机械性缺陷。本研究旨在评估ALT检测直肠切除术后吻合口漏(AL)的疗效。

方法

我们回顾了2012年1月至2018年1月间接受根治性手术的直肠癌患者数据库。根据是否进行ALT对患者进行分组。采用倾向评分分析比较1:1病例匹配队列中各组的结果。

结果

共有1191例患者接受了直肠切除术;438例(每组219例)组成病例匹配队列进行分析。ALT组和非ALT组的保护性造口率分别为16.0%和14.6%(P = 0.791)。在ALT组中,2例患者(0.9%)结果为阳性,接受直肠管引流治疗,未发生渗漏。两组术后AL发生率无显著差异(ALT组:4.6%;非ALT组:4.1%,P>0.999)。

结论

ALT在检测直肠切除术后的AL方面作用极小。有必要进行进一步研究以验证我们的结果,并阐明ALT或其他方法是否可预防AL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb23/10083345/1a26c977ba55/astr-104-214-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验