Cirugía Gastrointestinal y Endoscopia, Grupo de Gastrohepatología, Universidad de Antioquia, Instituto de Cancerología, Clínica Las Américas, AUNA, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Cirugía General, Instituto de Cancerología, Clínica Las Américas, AUNA, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed). 2022 Jul-Sep;87(3):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
The value of leakage testing during colorectal resections to identify anastomotic leaks or bleeding has not been established. Our aim was to compare the impact of intraoperative colonoscopy (IOC) versus insufflation with a syringe, as leakage testing in lower anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer, with respect to the incidence of postoperative leakage (PL).
A retrospective study utilizing a prospective database of 426 patients with rectal cancer that underwent elective LAR, within the time frame of January 2015 and December 2019, was conducted. The anastomotic leak test was chosen by the surgeon. The incidence of postoperative leakage was compared between patients that underwent IOC and those that had the syringe leak test, utilizing the logistic regression analysis. Propensity score matching was included.
There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics or morbidity and mortality rates between the two groups. Four patients were excluded, leaving a patient total of 422. Seventy patients with IOC were compared with 352 that had the syringe leak test. The incidence of postoperative leakage was 5.7% in the IOC group and 12.2% in the control group (p = 0.001). After propensity score matching (n = 221), balancing the characteristics between the groups, the incidence of postoperative leakage was 5.7% in the IOC group and 13.9% in the syringe leak test group (p = 0.001).
IOC was shown to be a safe method for evaluating the integrity of colorectal anastomosis and was associated with a higher percentage of protective stoma use, appearing to reduce the risk for PL.
在结直肠切除术中,渗漏检测的价值(以识别吻合口漏或出血)尚未确定。我们的目的是比较术中结肠镜检查(IOC)与注射器注气在低位前切除术(LAR)治疗直肠癌中的渗漏检测效果,以评估术后渗漏(PL)的发生率。
对 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受择期 LAR 的 426 例直肠癌患者进行回顾性研究,该研究使用前瞻性数据库。吻合口渗漏试验由外科医生选择。使用逻辑回归分析比较接受 IOC 和注射器渗漏试验的患者之间术后渗漏的发生率。包括倾向评分匹配。
两组患者的临床特征、发病率和死亡率无显著差异。排除 4 例患者,共纳入 422 例患者。将 70 例接受 IOC 的患者与 352 例接受注射器渗漏试验的患者进行比较。IOC 组术后渗漏发生率为 5.7%,对照组为 12.2%(p=0.001)。在进行倾向评分匹配(n=221)后,平衡组间特征,IOC 组术后渗漏发生率为 5.7%,注射器渗漏试验组为 13.9%(p=0.001)。
IOC 是一种安全的评估结直肠吻合完整性的方法,与更高比例的保护性造口使用相关,似乎降低了 PL 的风险。