Suppr超能文献

[多种胃食管反流诊断方法的价值比较]

[Comparison of the value of various methods for diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux].

作者信息

Junginger T, Trost A, Pichlmaier H

出版信息

Chir Forum Exp Klin Forsch. 1978(1978):1-5.

PMID:37053
Abstract

At the University Surgical Clinic Köln-Lindenthal 5 different methods were employed for assessment of gastro-esophageal reflux between 1975 - 1976 in 283 patients with and without reflux disturbances. Clinically, a gastro-esophageal reflux was found in 72% of the cases. The measurement of intra-esophageal pH with reflux-provocation was the most sensitive, and at the same time the most specific (83, 3%). Significant differentiation betwen patients with and without reflux who had an axial hiatus-hernia could not be made, using x-ray examination and counting of the number of times swallowed in the acid-clearing test. The most suitable procedure in proving the presence of gastro-esophageal reflux was esophagoscopy, intra-esophageal pH-measurement and acid-clearing-and-pH determination, in all of which the results correlated with each other to a high degree.

摘要

1975年至1976年间,在科隆-林登塔尔大学外科诊所,对283例有或无反流障碍的患者采用了5种不同方法评估胃食管反流。临床上,72%的病例发现有胃食管反流。通过反流激发测量食管内pH值是最敏感的,同时也是最具特异性的(83.3%)。使用X线检查和酸清除试验中吞咽次数计数,无法对有或无反流且患有轴型裂孔疝的患者进行显著区分。证明胃食管反流存在的最合适方法是食管镜检查、食管内pH值测量以及酸清除和pH值测定,所有这些方法的结果之间都高度相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验