Department of Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya 462-8508, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2023 Jun 16;64(Supplement_1):i69-i83. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad004.
Japanese national oncological experts convened to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle beam therapy (PT) for pulmonary, liver and lymph node oligometastases (P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM, respectively) and to conduct a statistically comparative analysis of the local control (LC) rate and overall survival (OS) rate of PT versus those of X-ray stereotactic body radiotherapy (X-SBRT) and X-ray intensity-modulated radiotherapy (X-IMRT). They conducted [1] an analysis of the efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy with PT for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM using a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional cohort study data set; [2] a systematic review of X-ray high-precision radiotherapy (i.e. X-SBRT/X-IMRT) and PT for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM; and [3] a statistical comparison between LC and OS of the cohort data set in PT and that of the extracted historical data set in X-SBRT/X-IMRT from the preceding systematic review. Safety was evaluated as the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, while statistical comparisons of LC and OS were conducted by estimating the incidence rate ratios (IRR) for local progression and mortality, respectively. This study demonstrated that PT provided durable LC (3-year LC rate: 72.8-83.2%) with acceptable OS (3-year OS rate: 38.5-68.1%) and risk of severe toxicity incidence of 0.8-3.5% in radical metastasis-directed therapy for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM. Compared to LC with X-SBRT or X-IMRT, LC with PT was potentially superior for P-OM; superior for L-OM; and equivalent for LN-OM. In particular, this study demonstrated that PT may be a new treatment option for L-OM tumors measuring > 5 cm.
日本国家肿瘤专家齐聚一堂,评估粒子束治疗(PT)治疗肺部、肝脏和淋巴结寡转移(分别为 P-OM、L-OM 和 LN-OM)的疗效和安全性,并对 PT 的局部控制(LC)率和总生存(OS)率与 X 射线立体定向体放射治疗(X-SBRT)和 X 射线强度调制放射治疗(X-IMRT)进行统计学比较分析。他们进行了 [1] 一项使用日本全国多机构队列研究数据集的针对 P-OM、L-OM 和 LN-OM 的转移导向治疗的疗效和安全性分析;[2] 一项关于 X 射线高精度放疗(即 X-SBRT/X-IMRT)和 P-OM、L-OM 和 LN-OM 的 PT 的系统评价;以及 [3] 对队列数据集中的 LC 和 OS 与从前面的系统评价中提取的 X-SBRT/X-IMRT 的历史数据集的统计比较。安全性评估为≥3 级不良事件的发生率,而 LC 和 OS 的统计比较分别通过估计局部进展和死亡率的发病率比(IRR)进行。本研究表明,PT 在根治性转移导向治疗中为 P-OM、L-OM 和 LN-OM 提供了持久的 LC(3 年 LC 率:72.8-83.2%)和可接受的 OS(3 年 OS 率:38.5-68.1%)以及 0.8-3.5%的严重毒性发生率。与 X-SBRT 或 X-IMRT 相比,PT 在治疗 P-OM 时可能具有潜在的优势,在治疗 L-OM 时具有优势,在治疗 LN-OM 时具有等效性。特别是,本研究表明,PT 可能是一种治疗直径大于 5cm 的 L-OM 肿瘤的新治疗选择。