Suppr超能文献

一项针对肾细胞癌的粒子治疗的日本注册研究和系统评价。

A Japanese registry study and systematic review of particle therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Faculty of Medicine, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2023 Jun 16;64(Supplement_1):i41-i48. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrad010.

Abstract

The feasibility and efficacy of particle beam therapy (PBT) using protons or carbon ions were compared with those of photon-based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) via a systematic review and nationwide registry for PBT (Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology [JASTRO] particle therapy committee). Between July 2016 and May 2019, 20 patients with non-metastatic RCC who were treated at six Japanese institutes (using protons at three, using carbon ions at the other three) were registered in the nationwide database and followed up prospectively. The 20 patients comprised 15 men and had a median age of 67 (range: 57-88) years. The total radiation dose was 66-79.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). Over a median follow up of 31 months, the 3-year rates of overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were 100% and 94.4%, respectively. No grade ≥ 3 toxicities were observed. Based on a random effects model, a meta-analysis including the present results revealed 3-year OS rates after SBRT and PBT of 75.3% (95% CI: 57.3-86.6) and 94.3% (95% CI: 86.8-97.6), respectively (P = 0.005), but the difference in LC rates between the two methods was not observed (P = 0.63). PBT is expected to have similar if not better treatment results compared with SBRT for primary renal cancer. In particular, PBT was shown to be effective even for large RCC and could provide a therapeutic option when SBRT is not indicated.

摘要

采用质子或碳离子的粒子束治疗(PBT)与基于光子的立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)治疗原发性肾细胞癌(RCC)的可行性和疗效通过系统评价和全国性 PBT 登记处(日本放射肿瘤学会[JASTRO]粒子治疗委员会)进行了比较。2016 年 7 月至 2019 年 5 月,6 家日本机构(3 家使用质子,3 家使用碳离子)治疗的 20 例非转移性 RCC 患者在全国性数据库中注册并进行了前瞻性随访。20 例患者包括 15 名男性,中位年龄为 67 岁(范围:57-88 岁)。总辐射剂量为 66-79.6 Gy(相对生物效应[RBE])。中位随访 31 个月后,总生存率(OS)和局部控制率(LC)分别为 100%和 94.4%。未观察到任何 3 级及以上毒性。基于随机效应模型,包括本研究结果在内的荟萃分析显示,SBRT 和 PBT 后 3 年 OS 率分别为 75.3%(95%CI:57.3-86.6)和 94.3%(95%CI:86.8-97.6)(P=0.005),但两种方法的 LC 率差异无统计学意义(P=0.63)。与 SBRT 相比,PBT 治疗原发性肾癌的疗效相似,如果不是更好的话。特别是,PBT 对大型 RCC 也显示出有效性,并且在不适合 SBRT 的情况下提供了一种治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ea/10278877/2943a44dcfe8/rrad010f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验