Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK
Centre for Primary Health and Social Care, London Metropolitan University, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 13;13(4):e069017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069017.
The new structured medication review (SMR) service was introduced into the National Health Service in England during the COVID-19 pandemic, following a major expansion of clinical pharmacists within new formations known as primary care networks (PCNs). The aim of the SMR is to tackle problematic polypharmacy through comprehensive, personalised medication reviews involving shared decision-making. Investigation of clinical pharmacists' perceptions of training needs and skills acquisition issues for person-centred consultation practice will help better understand their readiness for these new roles.
A longitudinal interview and observational study in general practice.
A longitudinal study of 10 newly recruited clinical pharmacists interviewed three times, plus a single interview with 10 pharmacists recruited earlier and already established in general practice, across 20 newly forming PCNs in England. Observation of a compulsory 2-day history taking and consultation skills workshop.
A modified framework method supported a constructionist thematic analysis.
Remote working during the pandemic limited opportunities for patient-facing contact. Pharmacists new to their role in general practice were predominantly concerned with improving clinical knowledge and competence. Most said they already practiced person-centred care, using this terminology to describe transactional medicines-focused practice. Pharmacists rarely received direct feedback on consultation practice to calibrate perceptions of their own competence in person-centred communication, including shared decision-making skills. Training thus provided knowledge delivery with limited opportunities for actual skills acquisition. Pharmacists had difficulty translating abstract consultation principles into specific consultation practices.
SMRs were introduced when the dedicated workforce was largely new and being trained. Addressing problematic polypharmacy requires structural and organisational interventions to enhance the communication skills of clinical pharmacists (and other health professionals), and their use in practice. The development of person-centred consultation skills requires much more substantial support than has so far been provided for clinical pharmacists.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,随着新的基层医疗网络(PCN)中临床药师的大幅增加,新的结构化药物审查(SMR)服务在英格兰国民保健制度中推出。SMR 的目的是通过涉及共同决策的全面、个性化药物审查来解决多药问题。调查临床药师对以患者为中心的咨询实践的培训需求和技能获取问题的看法,将有助于更好地了解他们对这些新角色的准备情况。
在普通实践中进行的纵向访谈和观察研究。
在英格兰的 20 个新成立的 PCN 中,对 10 名新招募的临床药师进行了三次纵向访谈,并对 10 名已招募并已在普通实践中建立的早期药师进行了一次访谈。观察强制性的 2 天病史采集和咨询技巧研讨会。
修改后的框架方法支持建构主义主题分析。
大流行期间的远程工作限制了与患者面对面接触的机会。新加入普通实践的药师主要关注提高临床知识和能力。大多数人表示,他们已经在实践以患者为中心的护理,并用这个术语来描述以药物为中心的交易性实践。药师很少收到关于咨询实践的直接反馈,以校准他们在以患者为中心的沟通方面的自身能力的看法,包括共同决策技能。培训因此提供了知识传递,而实际技能获取的机会有限。药师很难将抽象的咨询原则转化为具体的咨询实践。
当专门的劳动力主要是新的和正在接受培训时,引入了 SMR。解决多药问题需要结构性和组织性干预措施,以提高临床药师(和其他卫生专业人员)的沟通技巧,并将其应用于实践中。以患者为中心的咨询技巧的发展需要比目前为临床药师提供的支持更加实质性。