Osemeke Onyekachukwu H, de Freitas Costa Eduardo, Weide Vinicius, Jayaraman Swaminathan, Silva Gustavo S, Linhares Daniel C L
Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, 2422 Lloyd, 1809 S Riverside Dr, Ames, IA, 50011-3619, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Bioinformatics, and Animal Models, Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Porcine Health Manag. 2023 Apr 13;9(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00309-x.
Family oral fluids (FOF) sampling has been described as a sampling technique where a rope is exposed to sows and respective suckling litters and thereafter wrung to obtain fluids. PCR-based testing of FOF reveals presence of PRRS virus RNA only at the litter level, as opposed to conventional individual-animal-based sampling methods that demonstrate PRRSV RNA at the piglet level. The relationship between the PRRSV prevalence at the individual piglet level and at the litter level in a farrowing room has not been previously characterized. Using Monte Carlo simulations and data from a previous study, the relationship between the proportion of PRRSV-positive (viremic) pigs in the farrowing room, the proportion of litters in the farrowing room with at least one viremic pig, and the likely proportion of litters to be positive by a FOF RT-rtPCR test in a farrowing room was characterized, taking into account the spatial distribution (homogeneity) of viremic pigs within farrowing rooms.
There was a linear relationship between piglet-level- and litter-level prevalence, where the latter was always larger than the former. When the piglet-level prevalence was 1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 50%, the true-litter level prevalence was 5.36%, 8.93%, 14.29%, 23.21%, and 53.57%, respectively. The corresponding apparent-litter prevalence by FOF was 2.06%, 6.48%, 11.25%, 21.60%, and 51.56%, respectively.
This study provides matching prevalence estimates to help guide sample size calculations. It also provides a framework to estimate the likely proportion of viremic pigs, given the PRRSV RT-rtPCR positivity rate of FOF samples submitted from a farrowing room.
家庭口腔液体(FOF)采样是一种采样技术,将绳索暴露于母猪及其相应的哺乳仔猪,然后拧绞绳索以获取液体。基于PCR的FOF检测仅在窝水平上揭示猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)RNA的存在,这与传统的基于个体动物的采样方法不同,后者在仔猪水平上检测到PRRSV RNA。此前尚未对产房中个体仔猪水平和窝水平的PRRSV流行率之间的关系进行过描述。利用蒙特卡洛模拟和先前一项研究的数据,考虑到产房中病毒血症猪的空间分布(均匀性),对产房中PRRSV阳性(病毒血症)猪的比例、产房中至少有一头病毒血症猪的窝的比例以及产房中通过FOF RT-rtPCR检测呈阳性的窝的可能比例之间的关系进行了描述。
仔猪水平和窝水平的流行率之间存在线性关系,后者总是大于前者。当仔猪水平的流行率为1%、5%、10%、20%和50%时,真实窝水平的流行率分别为5.36%、8.93%、14.29%、23.21%和53.57%。通过FOF得到的相应表观窝流行率分别为2.06%、6.48%、11.25%、21.60%和51.56%。
本研究提供了匹配的流行率估计值,以帮助指导样本量计算。它还提供了一个框架,在已知产房提交的FOF样本的PRRSV RT-rtPCR阳性率的情况下,估计病毒血症猪的可能比例。