Suppr超能文献

赞成与反对观点辩论:外周神经阻滞应常规应用于四肢创伤,包括有发生急性骨筋膜室综合征风险的患者。

Pro-Con Debate: Peripheral Nerve Blockade Should Be Provided Routinely in Extremity Trauma, Including in Patients At Risk for Acute Compartment Syndrome.

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2023 May 1;136(5):855-860. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006394. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

Abstract

In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss the controversial debate of whether to provide peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) to patients at risk of acute extremity compartment syndrome (ACS). Traditionally, most practitioners adopt the conservative approach and withhold regional anesthetics for fear of masking an ACS (Con). Recent case reports and new scientific theory, however, demonstrate that modified PNB can be safe and advantageous in these patients (Pro). This article elucidates the arguments based on a better understanding of relevant pathophysiology, neural pathways, personnel and institutional limitations, and PNB adaptations in these patients.

摘要

在这篇正反方评论文章中,我们讨论了一个有争议的话题,即是否为有发生急性肢体间隔综合征(ACS)风险的患者提供外周神经阻滞(PNB)。传统上,大多数医生采取保守的方法,避免使用区域麻醉,以防掩盖 ACS(反对)。然而,最近的病例报告和新的科学理论表明,改良的 PNB 在这些患者中是安全且有利的(赞成)。本文通过更好地理解相关病理生理学、神经通路、人员和机构限制以及这些患者的 PNB 适应,阐述了这些论点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验