• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃间质瘤内镜切除穿孔的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。

Risk factors of perforation in gastric stromal tumors during endoscopic resection: a retrospective case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jul;26(4):590-603. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01391-4. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-023-01391-4
PMID:37061602
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perforation is a common complication during endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) associated with secondary infections, sepsis, hospitalization time and cost. However, the risk factors of perforation remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for perforation during ER of gGISTs.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included consecutive patients with gGISTs who underwent ER between June 2009 and November 2021 at the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for perforation. Sensitivity analyses with propensity scoring (PS) were performed to evaluate the stability of the independent effects.

RESULTS

In total, 422 patients with gGISTs were included. The following factors were associated with perforation during ER: in the non-intraluminal growth patterns (all confounders adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 5.39, 95% CI 2.99-9.72, P < 0.001), in the gastric fundus (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.40-3.60, P = 0.007), sized ≥ 2 cm (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.04-2.77, P = 0.035), in the lesser curvature (aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-0.27, P < 0.001), and in the gastric cardia (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.50, P = 0.003). The PS analysis confirmed the stable independent effects of these identified risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

ERs of gGISTs in non-intraluminal growth patterns, in the gastric fundus, and with larger tumor size were independent risk factors for perforation. While tumors in the lesser curvature or gastric cardia were independent protective factor for perforation.

摘要

背景和目的

穿孔是内镜下胃胃肠间质瘤(gGIST)切除术(ER)的常见并发症,可导致继发感染、脓毒症、住院时间和费用增加。然而,穿孔的危险因素仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨 gGIST 内镜下切除穿孔的危险因素。

方法

本回顾性病例对照研究纳入了 2009 年 6 月至 2021 年 11 月在南京鼓楼医院接受 ER 治疗的连续 gGIST 患者。采用单因素和多因素分析探讨穿孔的危险因素。采用倾向评分(PS)进行敏感性分析,以评估独立效应的稳定性。

结果

共纳入 422 例 gGIST 患者。以下因素与 ER 期间穿孔相关:非腔内生长模式(所有混杂因素调整后优势比[aOR]:5.39,95%CI 2.99-9.72,P<0.001),胃底(aOR 2.25,95%CI 1.40-3.60,P=0.007),直径≥2cm(aOR 1.70,95%CI 1.04-2.77,P=0.035),胃小弯(aOR 0.12,95%CI 0.05-0.27,P<0.001),胃贲门(aOR 0.13,95%CI 0.04-0.50,P=0.003)。PS 分析证实了这些确定的危险因素具有稳定的独立效应。

结论

非腔内生长模式、胃底和较大肿瘤直径的 gGIST ER 是穿孔的独立危险因素。而胃小弯或胃贲门的肿瘤是穿孔的独立保护因素。

相似文献

1
Risk factors of perforation in gastric stromal tumors during endoscopic resection: a retrospective case-control study.胃间质瘤内镜切除穿孔的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jul;26(4):590-603. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01391-4. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
Risk factors for postoperative complications in endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center analysis.内镜切除胃胃肠间质瘤术后并发症的危险因素:多中心分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6844-6851. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10177-9. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Comparison of Modified Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Treating Intraluminal Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (≤20 mm).对比改良帽辅助内镜下黏膜切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗腔内胃胃肠间质瘤(≤20mm)。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 1;14(6):e00589. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000589.
4
Risk factors for conversion from endoscopic resection to laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.内镜切除转腹腔镜切除治疗胃胃肠间质瘤的危险因素。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Apr;51(4):3000605231167796. doi: 10.1177/03000605231167796.
5
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria: a 7-year experience from a large tertiary center in China.中国一家大型三级中心 7 年的经验:内镜切除治疗源于固有肌层的胃胃肠间质瘤的临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1544-1553. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08443-9. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
6
Effect of endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach under double-channel gastroscopy: A retrospective observational study.双腔胃镜下内镜切除术治疗胃胃肠间质瘤的效果:一项回顾性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 5;101(31):e29941. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029941.
7
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for small (≤ 4.0 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer.内镜切除起源于固有肌层的直径≤4.0cm 胃固有层小胃肠间质瘤的长期疗效。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul 21;24(27):3030-3037. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i27.3030.
8
An evaluation of the use of double-curved endoscopes for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.双弯内镜在胃胃肠间质瘤中的应用评价。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2023 Jun;32(3):112-118. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2023.2186182. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic treatment for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single-center study of 240 cases in China.中国单中心 240 例内镜治疗胃胃肠间质瘤的临床结果研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug;57(8):996-1004. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2045351. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
10
Endoscopic Enucleation Is Effective and Relatively Safe in Small Gastric Subepithelial Tumors Originating from Muscularis Propria.内镜下剥离术治疗源于固有肌层的小胃黏膜下肿瘤安全有效。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Feb;64(2):524-531. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5348-1. Epub 2018 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an intraoperative perforation prediction scoring system for endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.胃胃肠道间质瘤内镜切除术中穿孔预测评分系统的开发与验证
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12101-9.
2
Endoscopic resection for gastric subepithelial tumours: a retrospective cohort study.胃上皮下肿瘤的内镜切除术:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2514788. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2514788. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
3
A new endoscopic treatment for gastric fundal subepithelial lesions using loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Stomach.胃胃肠间质瘤内镜治疗的临床疗效及安全性。
Gut Liver. 2023 Mar 15;17(2):217-225. doi: 10.5009/gnl210454. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
2
Correlation between endoscopic resection outcomes and endosonographic findings in gastric tumors with muscularis propria origin.胃固有肌层来源肿瘤的内镜切除结果与超声内镜检查结果的相关性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e29947. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029947.
3
Effects of Endoscopic Submucosal Excavation With Non-Submucosal Injection on Stromal Tumors in Stomach.
一种使用圈套辅助反转和双重缝合技术治疗胃底上皮下病变的新型内镜治疗方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 22;15(1):9955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94749-w.
4
Efficacy analysis of modified double band ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection and endoscopic mucosal dissection in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (≤ 1.5 cm).改良双环套扎辅助内镜黏膜下剥离术与内镜黏膜下切除术治疗胃胃肠道间质瘤(≤1.5厘米)的疗效分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2471-2480. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11598-4. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
非黏膜下注射内镜下黏膜下挖除术治疗胃间质瘤的疗效
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 4;12:792445. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.792445. eCollection 2022.
4
Real-time automated diagnosis of colorectal cancer invasion depth using a deep learning model with multimodal data (with video).使用多模态数据(含视频)的深度学习模型实时自动诊断结直肠癌浸润深度。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1186-1194.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.11.049. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
5
Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.相对较小的胃胃肠道间质瘤(<5厘米)的内镜、腹腔镜和开放手术切除的比较:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 29;11:672364. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.672364. eCollection 2021.
6
Predictors of the difficulty for endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor and follow-up data.内镜切除胃胃肠间质瘤的难度预测因素及随访资料。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan;37(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15650. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
7
Laparoscopic versus EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: an international multicenter propensity score-matched comparison (with video).腹腔镜与超声内镜引导下胃肠吻合术治疗胃出口梗阻:一项国际多中心倾向评分匹配比较(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Sep;94(3):526-536.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Comparison of endoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A preliminary meta-analysis.内镜与腹腔镜胃胃肠间质瘤切除术的比较:初步荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;35(11):1858-1868. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15106. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large gastric stromal tumors.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃巨大间质瘤的疗效及安全性。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;44(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Dec 15.
10
Laparoscopic resection is better than endoscopic dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor between 2 and 5 cm in size: a case-matched study in a gastrointestinal center.腹腔镜切除优于内镜剥离用于 2-5cm 大小的胃胃肠间质瘤:胃肠中心的病例匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5098-5106. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07251-6. Epub 2019 Dec 2.