• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体特定证据具有调动关系能力的能力:在长期健康状况人群中发展的四步扎根理论。

Person-specific evidence has the ability to mobilize relational capacity: A four-step grounded theory developed in people with long-term health conditions.

机构信息

The Interdisciplinary Research Unit of Women's, Children's and Families' Health, Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

出版信息

Nurs Inq. 2023 Jul;30(3):e12555. doi: 10.1111/nin.12555. Epub 2023 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1111/nin.12555
PMID:37062853
Abstract

Person-specific evidence was developed as a grounded theory by analyzing 20 selected case descriptions from interventions using the guided self-determination method with people with various long-term health conditions. It explains the mechanisms of mobilizing relational capacity by including person-specific evidence in shared decision-making. Person-specific self-insight was the first step, achieved as individuals completed reflection sheets enabling them to clarify their personal values and identify actions or omissions related to self-management challenges. This step paved the way for sharing these insights and challenges in a relationship with a supportive health professional, who could then rely on person-specific evidence instead of assumptions or a narrow disease perspective for shared decision-making. Trust in the evidence encouraged the supportive health professional to transfer it to the interdisciplinary team. Person-specific evidence then enhanced the ability of team members to apply general evidence in a meaningful way. The increased openness achieved by individuals through these steps enabled them to eventually share their new self-insights in daily life with other people, decreasing loneliness they experienced in self-management. Relational capacity, the core of the theory, is mobilized in both people with long-term health conditions and healthcare professionals. Further research on person-specific evidence and relational capacity in healthcare is recommended.

摘要

个体化证据是通过对使用引导自主决策方法干预的 20 个选定案例描述进行扎根理论分析而得出的。它通过将个体化证据纳入共同决策,解释了调动关系能力的机制。个体化自我洞察是第一步,个体完成反思表,从而能够明确自己的个人价值观,并确定与自我管理挑战相关的行动或不作为。这一步为与支持性健康专业人员分享这些见解和挑战铺平了道路,后者可以依靠个体化证据而不是假设或狭隘的疾病观点来进行共同决策。对证据的信任鼓励支持性健康专业人员将其转移到跨学科团队。个体化证据随后增强了团队成员以有意义的方式应用一般证据的能力。个体通过这些步骤实现的开放性增加,使他们能够最终在日常生活中与其他人分享新的自我洞察,减少自我管理中所经历的孤独感。关系能力是理论的核心,在患有长期健康状况的人和医疗保健专业人员中都得到了调动。建议进一步研究医疗保健中的个体化证据和关系能力。

相似文献

1
Person-specific evidence has the ability to mobilize relational capacity: A four-step grounded theory developed in people with long-term health conditions.个体特定证据具有调动关系能力的能力:在长期健康状况人群中发展的四步扎根理论。
Nurs Inq. 2023 Jul;30(3):e12555. doi: 10.1111/nin.12555. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
2
The importance of personal documentation for patients living with long-term illness symptoms after pituitary surgery: A Constructivist Grounded Theory study.垂体手术后长期患病症状患者个人文档的重要性:建构主义扎根理论研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):226-236. doi: 10.1111/hex.13648. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Impact of the person-centred intervention guided self-determination across healthcare settings-An integrated review.以患者为中心的跨医疗环境的自主决策干预措施的影响:一项综合评价。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Mar;37(1):37-59. doi: 10.1111/scs.13138. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Shifting responsibilities: A qualitative study of how young people assume responsibility from their parents for self-management of their chronic kidney disease.责任转移:一项关于年轻人如何从父母那里承担起自身慢性肾脏病自我管理责任的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1919-1929. doi: 10.1111/hex.13549. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
An explanation of turnover intention among early-career nursing and allied health professionals working in rural and remote Australia - findings from a grounded theory study.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区初入职场的护理及相关健康专业人员离职意向的解释——基于扎根理论研究的结果
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Sep;18(3):4511. doi: 10.22605/RRH4511. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
7
Translating person-centered care into practice: A comparative analysis of motivational interviewing, illness-integration support, and guided self-determination.将以患者为中心的护理转化为实践:动机性访谈、疾病整合支持和引导式自我决定的比较分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Enabling the flow of compassionate care: a grounded theory study.促进关怀式护理的实施:一项扎根理论研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 3;17(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2120-8.
9
Professionals' views and experiences in supporting decision-making involvement for people living with dementia.专业人士在支持痴呆症患者参与决策方面的观点和经验。
Dementia (London). 2021 Jan;20(1):84-105. doi: 10.1177/1471301219864849. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Autonomy and social influence in predictive genetic testing decision-making: A qualitative interview study.预测性基因检测决策中的自主性和社会影响:一项定性访谈研究。
Bioethics. 2021 Feb;35(2):199-206. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12816. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Fidelity of the Guided Self-Determination program in the MyHealth study during breast cancer follow-up.在乳腺癌随访期间,“我的健康”研究中引导式自我决定项目的保真度。
Acta Oncol. 2025 Feb 17;64:284-291. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42253.
2
Prediabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the effectiveness of a guided self-determination counselling approach in primary health care, a randomized controlled trial.糖尿病前期和心血管危险因素:初级卫生保健中引导自主决策咨询方法的有效性,一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):3035. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20538-1.
3
Face and content validity of the EMPOWER-UP questionnaire: a generic measure of empowerment in relational decision-making and problem-solving.
EMPOWER-UP 问卷的表面效度和内容效度:关系决策和问题解决中赋权的通用衡量标准。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02727-5.
4
Interprofessional follow-up for people at risk of type 2 diabetes in primary healthcare - a randomized controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews.多专业团队对 2 型糖尿病高危人群在初级卫生保健中的随访-一项随机对照试验,嵌入定性访谈。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Sep;42(3):450-462. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2337071. Epub 2024 Apr 8.