Van Scoy Lauren Jodi, Scott Allison M, Green Michael J, Witt Pamela D, Wasserman Emily, Chinchilli Vernon M, Levi Benjamin H
Departments of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Department of Humanities, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, USA.
Commun Methods Meas. 2022;16(3):215-235. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2022.2099819. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
Communication Quality Analysis (CQA) is a rigorous transcript-based coding method for assessing clinical communication quality. We compared the resource-intensive transcript-based version with a streamlined real-time version of the method with respect to feasibility, validity, reliability, and association with traditional measures of communication quality. Simulated conversations between 108 trainees and 12 standardized patients were assessed by 7 coders using the two versions of CQA (transcript and real-time). Participants also completed two traditional communication quality assessment measures. Real-time CQA was feasible and yielded fair to excellent reliability, with some caveats that can be addressed in future work. CQA ratings were moderately correlated with traditional measures of communication quality, suggesting that CQA captures different aspects of communication quality than do traditional measures. Finally, CQA did not exhibit the ceiling effects observed in the traditional measures of communication quality. We conclude that real-time CQA is a user-friendly method for assessing communication quality that has the potential for broad application in training, research, and intervention contexts and may offer improvements to traditional, self-rated communication measures.
沟通质量分析(CQA)是一种基于严格转录本的编码方法,用于评估临床沟通质量。我们就可行性、有效性、可靠性以及与传统沟通质量衡量指标的关联,对资源密集型的基于转录本的版本与该方法的简化实时版本进行了比较。7名编码员使用CQA的两个版本(转录本和实时版本)对108名学员与12名标准化病人之间的模拟对话进行了评估。参与者还完成了两项传统的沟通质量评估指标。实时CQA是可行的,可靠性从中等到优秀,不过有些注意事项可在未来工作中解决。CQA评分与传统沟通质量衡量指标呈中度相关,这表明CQA捕捉到的沟通质量方面与传统指标不同。最后,CQA没有表现出在传统沟通质量衡量指标中观察到的上限效应。我们得出结论,实时CQA是一种评估沟通质量的用户友好型方法,有潜力在培训、研究和干预环境中广泛应用,并且可能改进传统的自评沟通指标。