• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传播学学者评估的沟通有效性与患者对临床医生同理心的感知相关吗?

Does Communication Effectiveness Assessed by Communication Scholars Correlate with Patient Perception of Clinician Empathy?

作者信息

Ponce Haley, Cordero Rafael, Tran Jacinta, Wellman Natalie, Ring David

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School-The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

Moody School of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2025 Feb 21;12:23743735251323674. doi: 10.1177/23743735251323674. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1177/23743735251323674
PMID:39989889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11846112/
Abstract

In a prior study, communication scholar ratings of clinician communication effectiveness did not correlate with perceived clinician empathy, which is one aspect of patient experience. We repeated the analysis with a different rating of communication effectiveness to increase confidence that the lack of association was not due to an inadequate rating tool. Video-recorded visits (108) were rated by 3 trained observers using the Communication Quality Analysis with acceptable reliability. Patients completed measures of perceived clinician empathy, pain accommodation, health anxiety, and depression symptoms. Negative binomial regression analysis sought factors associated with perceived clinician empathy. Only accommodation of pain met the criterion for entry into a multivariable model for perceived clinician empathy (ρ = 0.17;  = .08). No factors were associated with perceived clinician empathy, including independently rated communication effectiveness. The consistent finding of no correlation between communication effectiveness and patient perception clinician empathy using a second rating tool does not diminish the importance of effective patient-clinician communication, but it does reinforce the need to identify suitable measures of modifiable factors associated with poor patient experience.

摘要

在一项先前的研究中,沟通学者对临床医生沟通效果的评分与患者所感受到的临床医生同理心(这是患者体验的一个方面)并无关联。我们用一种不同的沟通效果评分方法重复了该分析,以增强对缺乏关联并非由于评分工具不充分这一结论的信心。108次视频记录的就诊由3名经过培训的观察者使用具有可接受信度的沟通质量分析进行评分。患者完成了对临床医生同理心、疼痛适应性、健康焦虑和抑郁症状的测量。负二项回归分析寻找与患者所感受到的临床医生同理心相关的因素。只有疼痛适应性符合纳入患者所感受到的临床医生同理心多变量模型的标准(ρ = 0.17;P = 0.08)。没有任何因素与患者所感受到的临床医生同理心相关,包括独立评分的沟通效果。使用第二种评分工具得出的沟通效果与患者对临床医生同理心的感知之间始终不存在相关性这一发现,并未削弱有效的医患沟通的重要性,但确实强化了识别与不良患者体验相关的可改变因素的合适测量方法的必要性。

相似文献

1
Does Communication Effectiveness Assessed by Communication Scholars Correlate with Patient Perception of Clinician Empathy?传播学学者评估的沟通有效性与患者对临床医生同理心的感知相关吗?
J Patient Exp. 2025 Feb 21;12:23743735251323674. doi: 10.1177/23743735251323674. eCollection 2025.
2
There is Little or No Association Between Independently Assessed Communication Strategies and Patient Ratings of Clinician Empathy.独立评估的沟通策略与患者对临床医生同理心的评价之间几乎没有关联。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):984-991. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002482. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
When Musculoskeletal Clinicians Respond to Empathetic Opportunities, do Patients Perceive Greater Empathy?当肌肉骨骼临床医生回应共情机会时,患者是否会感到更大的共情?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1771-1780. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002614. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
4
Does Addressing Mental Health During a Musculoskeletal Specialty Care Visit Affect Patient-rated Clinician Empathy?在肌肉骨骼专科就诊期间解决心理健康问题是否会影响患者对临床医生同理心的评价?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):976-983. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002494. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
5
In Orthopaedic Speciality Care, Longer Explanations Are Not More Caring or More Satisfying.在骨科专业护理中,解释得更长并不意味着更关心或更满意。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2601-2607. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001860.
6
Clinician Interruptions and Patient-Rated Clinician Empathy in Specialty Visits.专科门诊中的临床医生打断行为与患者对临床医生同理心的评价
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov 1;31(21):1129-1135. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00071. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
7
Are Patient Linguistic Tones Associated with Mental Health and Perceived Clinician Empathy?患者的语言语调与心理健康及感知到的临床医生同理心有关吗?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Dec 1;103(23):2181-2189. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00124. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
8
Does notifying clinicians about poor sleep quality influence patient-perceived empathy? Results from a randomized controlled trial.告知临床医生患者睡眠质量差是否会影响患者感知到的同理心?一项随机对照试验的结果。
Sleep Med. 2025 Jul;131:106502. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.106502. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
9
Patient Perceived Involvement in Their Treatment is Influenced by Factors Other Than Independently Rated Clinician Communication Effectiveness.患者对自身治疗的感知参与度受到独立评估的临床医生沟通效果以外的因素影响。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Dec 8;8:23743735211065261. doi: 10.1177/23743735211065261. eCollection 2021.
10
The Correlation of Communication Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction.沟通有效性与患者满意度的相关性
J Patient Exp. 2021 Mar 3;8:2374373521998839. doi: 10.1177/2374373521998839. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Communication Quality Analysis: A user-friendly observational measure of patient-clinician communication.沟通质量分析:一种便于用户使用的医患沟通观察性测量方法。
Commun Methods Meas. 2022;16(3):215-235. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2022.2099819. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
There is Little or No Association Between Independently Assessed Communication Strategies and Patient Ratings of Clinician Empathy.独立评估的沟通策略与患者对临床医生同理心的评价之间几乎没有关联。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):984-991. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002482. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Factors Associated With Patient Satisfaction Measured Using an Iterative Scale.采用迭代量表测量的患者满意度相关因素。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2023;32(2):69-74. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000352. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
5
More Than Words: An Invited Commentary Regarding "Quantitative Patient-Reported Experience Measures Derived From Natural Language Processing Have a Normal Distribution and No Ceiling Effect".
Qual Manag Health Care. 2022;31(4):219-220. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000379. Epub 2022 May 27.
6
Quantitative Patient-Reported Experience Measures Derived From Natural Language Processing Have a Normal Distribution and No Ceiling Effect.源自自然语言处理的定量患者报告体验指标呈正态分布且无天花板效应。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2022;31(4):210-218. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000355. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
7
Does Adjusting for Social Desirability Reduce Ceiling Effects and Increase Variation of Patient-Reported Experience Measures?对社会期望进行调整是否会减少天花板效应并增加患者报告体验指标的变异性?
J Patient Exp. 2022 Feb 8;9:23743735221079144. doi: 10.1177/23743735221079144. eCollection 2022.
8
Predictors of Physician Compassion, Empathy, and Related Constructs: a Systematic Review.预测医师的同情心、同理心和相关概念:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Mar;37(4):900-911. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07055-2. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
The Patient's Point of View: Characterizing Patient-Level Factors Associated with Perceptions of Health Care.患者视角:描述与医疗保健认知相关的患者层面因素
Health Equity. 2021 Jun 25;5(1):457-465. doi: 10.1089/heq.2021.0062. eCollection 2021.
10
Factors Associated With Patient Satisfaction Measured Using a Guttman-Type Scale.使用古特曼式量表测量的与患者满意度相关的因素。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1211-1218. doi: 10.1177/2374373520948444. Epub 2020 Aug 13.