Chevalier Amelie, Vermue Hannes, Pringels Lauren, Herregodts Stijn, Duquesne Kate, Victor Jan, Loccufier Mia
Department of Electromechanical, Metals and Systems Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Electromechanics, CoSysLab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Bone Joint Res. 2023 Apr 17;12(4):285-293. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.124.BJR-2022-0298.R2.
The goal was to evaluate tibiofemoral knee joint kinematics during stair descent, by simulating the full stair descent motion in vitro. The knee joint kinematics were evaluated for two types of knee implants: bi-cruciate retaining and bi-cruciate stabilized. It was hypothesized that the bi-cruciate retaining implant better approximates native kinematics. The in vitro study included 20 specimens which were tested during a full stair descent with physiological muscle forces in a dynamic knee rig. Laxity envelopes were measured by applying external loading conditions in varus/valgus and internal/external direction. The laxity results show that both implants are capable of mimicking the native internal/external-laxity during the controlled lowering phase. The kinematic results show that the bi-cruciate retaining implant tends to approximate the native condition better compared to bi-cruciate stabilized implant. This is valid for the internal/external rotation and the anteroposterior translation during all phases of the stair descent, and for the compression-distraction of the knee joint during swing and controlled lowering phase. The results show a better approximation of the native kinematics by the bi-cruciate retaining knee implant compared to the bi-cruciate stabilized knee implant for internal/external rotation and anteroposterior translation. Whether this will result in better patient outcomes remains to be investigated.
目的是通过在体外模拟完整的下楼梯运动,评估下楼梯过程中胫股膝关节的运动学。对两种类型的膝关节植入物进行了膝关节运动学评估:双交叉保留型和双交叉稳定型。假设双交叉保留型植入物能更好地模拟自然运动学。体外研究包括20个标本,在动态膝关节试验台上,在生理肌肉力量作用下进行完整的下楼梯测试。通过在内外翻和内外方向施加外部负荷条件来测量松弛包络线。松弛结果表明,在控制下降阶段,两种植入物都能够模拟自然的内外松弛。运动学结果表明,与双交叉稳定型植入物相比,双交叉保留型植入物更倾向于更好地模拟自然状态。这对于下楼梯各阶段的内外旋转和前后平移,以及摆动和控制下降阶段的膝关节压缩-牵张都是有效的。结果表明,与双交叉稳定型膝关节植入物相比,双交叉保留型膝关节植入物在内外旋转和前后平移方面能更好地模拟自然运动学。这是否会带来更好的患者预后仍有待研究。