Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术患者使用的患者报告结局指标。

Patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Wang Yiou, Yin Meihua, Zhu Shibai, Chen Xi, Zhou Hongru, Qian Wenwei

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.

Institute of Basic Medical Sciences Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Bone Joint Res. 2021 Mar;10(3):203-217. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.103.BJR-2020-0268.R1.

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are being used increasingly in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a systematic review aimed at identifying psychometrically sound PROMs by appraising their measurement properties. Studies concerning the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of PROMs used in a TKA population were systematically retrieved via PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus. Ratings for methodological quality and measurement properties were conducted according to updated COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. Of the 155 articles on 34 instruments included, nine PROMs met the minimum requirements for psychometric validation and can be recommended to use as measures of TKA outcome: Oxford Knee Score (OKS); OKS-Activity and Participation Questionnaire (OKS-APQ); 12-item short form Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS-12); KOOS Physical function Short form (KOOS-PS); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index-Total Knee Replacement function short form (WOMAC-TKR); Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS); Forgotten Joint Score (FJS); Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP); and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score. The pain and function subscales in WOMAC, as well as the pain, function, and quality of life subscales in KOOS, were validated psychometrically as standalone subscales instead of as whole instruments. However, none of the included PROMs have been validated for all measurement properties. Thus, further studies are still warranted to evaluate those PROMs. Use of the other 25 scales and subscales should be tempered until further studies validate their measurement properties. Cite this article:  2021;10(3):203-217.

摘要

患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的应用越来越广泛。我们进行了一项系统评价,旨在通过评估其测量特性来确定心理测量学上合理的PROMs。通过PubMed、科学网、Embase和Scopus系统检索了有关TKA人群中使用的PROMs测量特性的开发和/或评估的研究。根据更新后的基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)方法,对方法学质量和测量特性进行评级。在纳入的34种工具的155篇文章中,9种PROMs符合心理测量学验证的最低要求,可推荐用作TKA结局的测量指标:牛津膝关节评分(OKS);OKS活动与参与问卷(OKS-APQ);12项简明膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局量表(KOOS-12);KOOS身体功能简表(KOOS-PS);西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数-全膝关节置换功能简表(WOMAC-TKR);下肢功能量表(LEFS);遗忘关节评分(FJS);患者膝关节植入物性能(PKIP);以及加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分。WOMAC中的疼痛和功能子量表,以及KOOS中的疼痛、功能和生活质量子量表,在心理测量学上被验证为独立的子量表,而不是作为完整的工具。然而,纳入的PROMs均未针对所有测量特性进行验证。因此,仍有必要进行进一步研究以评估这些PROMs。在进一步研究验证其测量特性之前,应谨慎使用其他25种量表和子量表。引用本文:2021;10(3):203-217。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b20/7998066/2399e5eae3cd/BJR-10-203-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验