Department of Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, Centre for Implantology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, NRW, Germany.
AALZ Aachen Dental Laser Center, Aachen, NRW, Germany.
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Feb 20;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00469-z.
To evaluate the effectiveness of an erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser with side-firing tip in decontamination of titanium (Ti) disc.
In the first test series, 29 Ti-discs were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and treated as follows: positive control (no treatment); Perioflow; Laser A (0.75 W, 100 Hz), Laser B (1.5 W, 30 Hz); Laser C (no radiation, 60% water); and Laser D (no radiation, 50% water). For bacterial quantification, colony forming units (CFU, vital cells only) and quantitative PCR (qPCR, vital and devital cells) were performed. In a second test series, 92 Ti-discs were used, contaminated with in vivo-grown biofilm and treated as follows: positive control (no treatment); Perioflow; Laser E (1.5 W, 30 Hz), and Laser F (no radiation, 50% water). Considering the different and unknown culture conditions, quantification of bacteria was performed by broad-spectrum bacterial qPCR only. Based on the assumption that all cells of an organism contain an equivalent complement of genetic information, genome equivalent (GE) determination ensured the detection of the different intact and semi-intact genomes, regardless of type of bacterial species and vitality, circumvent the inherent bias of cultures.
The GE values were significantly reduced by all interventions in both test series, compared to the positive control group (p < 0.001). In the first test series with S. aureus as model organism, Perioflow yielded a lower GE than the Laser groups A-D (all p < 0.025). The number of CFUs was significantly reduced in the intervention groups compared to the positive control (p < 0.001), except for Laser A (p = 0.157) and Laser D (p = 0.393). In the second test series, none of the pairwise comparisons of the intervention conditions showed a significant difference (Perioflow vs. Laser E: p = 0.732; Perioflow vs. Laser F: p = 0.590; Laser E vs. Laser F: p = 0.379).
The Er,Cr:YSGG laser with side-firing tip and Perioflow were equally capable of effectively decontaminating a Ti-disc surface. It is assumed that the bacterial reduction was largely due to the mechanical effect of the air and water stream.
评估侧向发射尖端铒铬:钇钪石榴石(Er,Cr:YSGG)激光在钛(Ti)盘去污中的效果。
在第一个测试系列中,将 29 个 Ti 盘污染有金黄色葡萄球菌,并进行如下处理:阳性对照(不处理);牙周冲洗;激光 A(0.75 W,100 Hz),激光 B(1.5 W,30 Hz);激光 C(无辐射,60%水);和激光 D(无辐射,50%水)。为了进行细菌定量,进行了集落形成单位(CFU,仅活细胞)和定量 PCR(qPCR,活细胞和死细胞)。在第二个测试系列中,使用了 92 个 Ti 盘,用体内生长的生物膜污染,并进行如下处理:阳性对照(不处理);牙周冲洗;激光 E(1.5 W,30 Hz)和激光 F(无辐射,50%水)。考虑到不同和未知的培养条件,仅通过广谱细菌 qPCR 进行细菌定量。基于这样的假设,即生物体的所有细胞都包含等量的遗传信息,基因组当量(GE)测定确保了不同完整和半完整基因组的检测,无论细菌种类和活力如何,避免了培养物固有的偏差。
与阳性对照组相比,两个测试系列中的所有干预措施均显著降低了 GE 值(p < 0.001)。在使用金黄色葡萄球菌作为模型生物的第一个测试系列中,牙周冲洗的 GE 值低于激光组 A-D(均 p < 0.025)。与阳性对照组相比,干预组的 CFU 数量显著减少(p < 0.001),但激光 A 除外(p = 0.157)和激光 D 除外(p = 0.393)。在第二个测试系列中,干预条件的两两比较均无显著差异(牙周冲洗与激光 E:p = 0.732;牙周冲洗与激光 F:p = 0.590;激光 E 与激光 F:p = 0.379)。
侧向发射尖端铒铬:钇钪石榴石激光与牙周冲洗同样能够有效地对 Ti 盘表面进行去污。据推测,细菌减少主要归因于空气和水射流的机械作用。