Suppr超能文献

血管加压素对心脏骤停的治疗效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Therapeutic effects of vasopressin on cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.

Medical Department, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):e065061. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065061.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the therapeutic effect of vasopressin as an alternative treatment for cardiac arrest.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for randomised controlled trials. The intervention included administration of vasopressin alone or vasopressin combined with epinephrine or vasopressin, steroids and epinephrine (VSE) versus epinephrine combined with placebo as control group. The primary outcome was the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The secondary outcomes included mid-term survival and mid-term good neurological outcome. We conducted subgroup analyses of the primary outcome based on different settings, different study drug strategies and different types of initial rhythm.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (n=6718) were included, of which eight trials (n=5638) reported the data on patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and four trials (n=1080) on patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). There were no significant differences between intravenous vasopressin and placebo in the outcomes of ROSC (relative risk (RR): 1.11; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.26), mid-term survival (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.66) and mid-term good neurological outcome (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.87). However, in the subgroup analysis, intravenous vasopressin as part of VSE can significantly improve the rate of ROSC (RR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.47) but not the rate of mid-term survival (RR: 2.15; 95% CI: 0.75 to 6.16) and mid-term good neurological outcome (RR: 1.80; 95% CI: 0.81 to 4.01) for patients with IHCA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study failed to demonstrate increased benefit from vasopressin with or without epinephrine compared with the standard of care. However, vasopressin as a part of VSE is associated with the improvement of ROSC in patients with IHCA, and the benefit on mid-term survival or mid-term good neurological outcome is uncertain. Larger trials should be conducted in the future to address the effect of vasopressin only, vasopressin plus epinephrine or VSE on cardiac arrest.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021293347.

摘要

目的

展示加压素作为心脏骤停替代治疗的疗效。

设计

系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 中的随机对照试验。干预措施包括单独使用加压素或加压素联合肾上腺素或加压素、类固醇和肾上腺素(VSE)与肾上腺素联合安慰剂作为对照组。主要结局是自主循环恢复(ROSC)。次要结局包括中期生存率和中期良好神经结局。我们根据不同的设置、不同的研究药物策略和不同的初始节律对主要结局进行了亚组分析。

结果

纳入了 12 项研究(n=6718),其中 8 项试验(n=5638)报告了院外心脏骤停患者的数据,4 项试验(n=1080)报告了院内心脏骤停(IHCA)患者的数据。静脉内加压素与安慰剂在 ROSC(相对风险(RR):1.11;95%CI:0.99 至 1.26)、中期生存率(RR:1.23;95%CI:0.90 至 1.66)和中期良好神经结局(RR:1.20;95%CI:0.77 至 1.87)方面无显著差异。然而,在亚组分析中,加压素作为 VSE 的一部分可以显著提高 ROSC 率(RR:1.32;95%CI:1.18 至 1.47),但不能提高 IHCA 患者的中期生存率(RR:2.15;95%CI:0.75 至 6.16)和中期良好神经结局(RR:1.80;95%CI:0.81 至 4.01)。

结论

我们的研究未能证明与标准治疗相比,加压素联合或不联合肾上腺素能带来更大的益处。然而,加压素作为 VSE 的一部分与 IHCA 患者 ROSC 的改善相关,其对中期生存率或中期良好神经结局的益处尚不确定。未来应进行更大规模的试验,以确定加压素、加压素加肾上腺素或 VSE 对心脏骤停的影响。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021293347。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2682/10111914/7054673cb011/bmjopen-2022-065061f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验