Suppr超能文献

在全肺切片上对肺气肿严重程度进行排名。上叶、下叶及全肺排名的一致性。

Ranking the severity of emphysema on whole lung slices. Concordance of upper lobe, lower lobe, and entire lung ranks.

作者信息

Wright J L, Barry W, Paré P D, Hogg J C

出版信息

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986 May;133(5):930-1.

PMID:3706903
Abstract

This study describes a modification of a standard method for grading emphysema that was originally described by Thurlbeck for postmortem lungs. The study was based on pneumonectomy specimens that were fixed in inflation and sliced sagittally. The midsagittal slice was impregnated with barium sulphate and examined under water by 2 observers on 2 separate occasions. It was then re-examined on 2 additional occasions with either the upper or the lower lobe covered and the grade assigned using the uncovered lobe. In each case, the grade was assigned by comparing the specimen with the panel of pictures of paper sections of lung provided by Thurlbeck and coworkers. The data showed good agreement between grades assigned on separate observations of the same lobe. They also showed that the order of cases from no emphysema to severe emphysema was changed little when the grade was assigned by observing either the upper or the lower lobe. We conclude that this modification of the previous technique described by Thurlbeck and coworkers provides a simple reliable method of ranking surgical lung specimens as to the severity of emphysema present.

摘要

本研究描述了一种对肺气肿分级标准方法的改良,该标准方法最初由瑟尔贝克针对尸检肺提出。该研究基于在充气状态下固定并沿矢状面切片的肺切除标本。将矢状面中部切片用硫酸钡浸渍,并由两名观察者在两个不同时间在水下进行检查。然后,在另外两个时间再次检查,每次覆盖上叶或下叶,使用未覆盖的叶进行分级。在每种情况下,通过将标本与瑟尔贝克及其同事提供的肺组织切片图片进行比较来分级。数据表明,对同一叶进行单独观察时所给出的分级之间具有良好的一致性。数据还表明,当通过观察上叶或下叶来分级时,从无肺气肿到严重肺气肿的病例顺序变化不大。我们得出结论,瑟尔贝克及其同事之前描述的技术的这种改良提供了一种简单可靠的方法,可根据存在的肺气肿严重程度对手术肺标本进行排序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验