Suppr超能文献

[新型冠状病毒肺炎mRNA疫苗的反应原性研究]

[Reactogenicity Study of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19].

作者信息

Inglés Torruella Joan, Gil Soto Rosa Maria, Sabaté Aguila Esther, García Grau Mercé, Pons Boronat Nina, Rubio Civit Adelaida, Bandera Baez Miriam, Moreno Martin Gustavo

机构信息

Salut Sant Joan Reus - Baix Camp. Hospital Universitari Sant Joan. Reus. Tarragona, Spain.

Facultad de Medicina. Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Reus. Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Prev Riesgos Labor. 2023 Apr 15;26(2):106-126. doi: 10.12961/aprl.2022.26.02.02.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the reactogenicity between the types of mRNA Commirnaty® (Pfizer) and Spikevax® (Moderna) vaccines against COVID-19 in a healthcare population.

METHODS

Cross sectional study of short-term adverse effects and their consequences (sick leave, limitations of daily life, etc.) after the administration of the first and second doses of both vaccines in professionals and students of a health institution. A questionnaire on symptoms and their consequences was administered seven days after each vaccination dose. The prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated. Differences between vaccines were quantified using the odds ratio (OR) and its 95%CI.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed by 1924 and 1170 healthcare providers (response rates 62.2% and 39.1%) after the first and second doses, respectively, of the Commirnaty® vaccine, and 410 (56.0%) and 107 (15.0%) of Spikevax®. After the first dose of Comirnaty®, 67.4% presented some adverse effect, and 76.1% for Spikevax® (OR 1.5 95%CI 1.2-1.9). In general, women and young people showed greater reactogenicity and differences between vaccinSpain. Consequences of adverse effects were more frequent for Spikevax®. The reactogenicity was higher after the second than the first dose, for both vaccines (Comirnaty®: 67.4% vs. 75.6%; Spikevax®: 76.1% vs. 87.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The greater reactogenicity and its consequences, for the first and second dose of the Spikevax® vaccine compared to Comirnaty®, and of the second dose compared to the first dose of both vaccines, provides useful knowledge for planning vaccination against COVID-19 campaigns in healthcare settings.

摘要

目的

比较医疗人群中辉瑞公司的Comirnaty®和莫德纳公司的Spikevax®两种mRNA新冠疫苗的反应原性。

方法

对一家卫生机构的专业人员和学生接种两剂这两种疫苗后的短期不良反应及其后果(病假、日常生活受限等)进行横断面研究。在每次接种疫苗剂量七天后发放关于症状及其后果的问卷。计算患病率和95%置信区间(95%CI)。使用优势比(OR)及其95%CI对疫苗之间的差异进行量化。

结果

分别有1924名和1170名医疗服务提供者(回复率分别为62.2%和39.1%)在接种Comirnaty®疫苗的第一剂和第二剂后完成问卷,接种Spikevax®疫苗的分别有410名(56.0%)和107名(15.0%)。接种Comirnaty®疫苗第一剂后,67.4%的人出现了一些不良反应,接种Spikevax®疫苗的为76.1%(OR 1.5,95%CI 1.2 - 1.9)。总体而言,女性和年轻人表现出更大的反应原性,且西班牙不同疫苗之间存在差异。Spikevax®疫苗不良反应的后果更常见。两种疫苗接种第二剂后的反应原性均高于第一剂(Comirnaty®:67.4%对75.6%;Spikevax®:76.1%对87.9%)。

结论

与Comirnaty®相比,Spikevax®疫苗第一剂和第二剂的反应原性更强及其后果更明显,且两种疫苗第二剂的反应原性均强于第一剂,这为在医疗机构规划新冠疫苗接种活动提供了有用的知识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验